Quotes from your two last posts - are you able to read what you wrote?
You pointed out the specific size of the map, the details of the terrain - all you are missing is the number of buildings and runways in your "just-a-thinkin' out loud" subtle request.
My post was pretty concise - and to what is being debated here? That you were made an example of or that you still don't understand the context of what this thread is for?
For someone who can't understand why 'time is taken' to respond to such things, perhaps start thinking about quantifying your 'oh so subtle' requests and the time effort that goes into such undertakings before posting. There's nothing wrong with your request, just a better time and place for it?
You understand, do you? I'm guessing regardless you are going to react more to my post than anything i've said thus far. THAT, is the definition of fruitless.