Guest Posted March 2, 2007 I was just looking on wikipedia about ArmA. There is no mention yet about the massive amount of bugs. Also no mention that the the game was released too early. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armed_Assault I would do it myself, but I would end up sounding bitter. If anyone out there is good at writing stuff up then go for it please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gux 0 Posted March 2, 2007 Why make a thread about it here when you could just post here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Armed_Assault Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
deanosbeano 0 Posted March 2, 2007 Quote[/b] ]There is no mention yet about the massive amount of bugs. Also no mention that the the game was released too early. Because that is no longer a fact and wiki`s like to be a place where people can read facts, not about a game that was released in november last year , which did need some work and now has had that work done. so maybe its easy for you to do it and not be bitter . simply type altho released a little early ,bis have worked miracles in a short time to rid this sequal to equal all sequals of bugs to within 99 .8 % of it being bug free . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted March 2, 2007 If you can make sense of what is written on those "Talk" Pages. This is the best place to mention it as it's where the affected party is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4 IN 1 0 Posted March 2, 2007 you saids you getting errors/crash/whatever but yet there isnt any single actural "i need help!" post you made without a single thing that the devs and other ppl needs to know inorder to help you out, so how can we help fix your problem? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted March 2, 2007 If you can make sense of what is written on those "Talk" Pages, be my guest. This is the best place to mention it as it's where the affected party is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Luciano 0 Posted March 2, 2007 I would do it, but I would sound too negative, and all of you would jump me So I guess I rather skip it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gux 0 Posted March 2, 2007 If you can make sense of what is written on those "Talk" Pages, be my guest.This is the best place to mention it as it's where the affected party is. No, wikipedia would be the best place to suggest changes to a wikipedia page. If you don't know how or are willing to learn(how to read) then just give up. Don't try to make other people do work for you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Dawg KS 6 Posted March 2, 2007 Also no mention that the the game was released too early. That's just a biased opinion, and there's no proof that the game was factually released too early (nor will there be because it's a matter of opinion). If people start adding stuff like that to the ArmA page on Wikipedia they'll most likely get it deleted. You can say a that a certain number of community members expressed these beliefs and that many complained, but it needs to be neutral/unbiased. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Dawg KS 6 Posted March 2, 2007 Oops sorry, double post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
deanosbeano 0 Posted March 2, 2007 Also no mention that the the game was released too early. That's just a biased opinion, and there's no proof that the game was factually released too early (nor will there be because it's a matter of opinion). If people start adding stuff like that to the ArmA page on Wikipedia they'll most likely get it deleted. You can say a that a certain number of community members expressed these beliefs and that many complained, but it needs to be neutral/unbiased. Bohemia Interactive Studio employee and ArmA designer Markus Kurzawa "Markus says, “It is unfortunate that the German, Czech and Polish versions were released so earlyâ€. " Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
