Corsair 10 Posted March 6, 2013 (edited) Hi everyone; First i would like to say that i'm very surprised about ArmA III alpha, it runs very great (almost like ArmA II does) and there are a lot of nice features; My FPS go from 30 to 60, with an average of 40/50 fps in game; my settings are a mix between High and Very High. My rig: CPU → i5 2500k OC'ed at 4.3GHz GPU → ASUS EN580GTX DC2 Mobo → ASUS P67 Sabertooth RAM → Corsair Vengeance 2*4Go PSU → LEPA G700W Case → Corsair Obsidian 650D OS → Win 7 Home premium Second great surprise, ArmA III uses my all 4 cores, but only at 50% (almost always between 45 and 55, no drop or peak); but my GPU is more weirdly solicited. Per example in the ZIL Punisher (the weird Iranian car) as gunner i get around 30 fps with the PiP screen in front of me, GPU usage ~50%; in zoomed mode (numpad 0) my GPU is used at 99% and I get slightly better fps (+10).. I tried to modify some settings but nothing change; → AA (no change at all between off and 8x) → Anisotropic (same) → PiP setting (same fps between Low and Ultra, maybe a 1 fps difference). Also, when I get out of the vehicle and when i look at the forest my GPU has also a 99% peak. I find these weird because on some french forums people complain about low GPU but hi CPU usage (not with all cores though). I would like to know if some people are experiencing the same uneffectiveness of changing some parameters, and compare their GPU/CPU usage. Thanks a lot, have a good night Corsair Edited March 6, 2013 by Corsair Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
