MarjahGrunt0331

I really do appreciate your work. Your MOD along with Massi's are starting to give ArmA 3 the life ArmA 2 has. I do have a question - though probably a stupid one; How does one access the service menu?

I'm unaware of the similarities of currency between the U.S. Dollar, and Pounds, and Euros. But $$59.99($60) is 1/3 if not half of an average workers pay check here. Paying that much for a game that did not meet what i marketed/advertised months ago, as well as have nothing currently new, or different from when the game was half the price in beta is a little ridiculous. If you truly can not see the point in this it has obviously went over your head. There's nothing to justify, or argue about. It's just facts.

Hello, I consider myself a pretty loyal fan to BIS, and their ArmA series. I believe I own every military sim game they have put out thus far. I greatly appreciate the time, and effort they have put into keeping the ArmA community alive, as well as help build upon it. This is merely to express, and address my concern about ArmA 3's "Release" today. With the absence of any patch notes, and with the patch itself being 3.5GB, I fail to notice anything different from beta at all. The game still feels incomplete, there seems to be a lack in 'teased' vehicles such as the screen shots of the F-35's, as well as the wreck of the MV-22 Osprey model. In this release patch there are absolutely no new vehicles, or weapons that were not in the development branch. Now, do not get me wrong, this is by no means a complaint about the limited amount of vehicles - the fact is the game is still not complete at all and the price has changed to that of a full, finished game; $59.99. I have had the game since its alpha stage, so the price does not effect me personally. I just do not believe it is right to charge people for ArmA 3 with the price of a full game when it itself is clearly not. Please avoid letting your company earn a bad reputation for such a thing. Be reasonable, and honest. Do not let yourself be apart of a chain of bad releases this month, thank you. From love, not hate. I'll still be playing the game, and surely purchasing future content. But some things should be addressed properly.

Yes, infantry based. But there is no balance of CAS assets with AAF having the only pair of jet aircraft in game.

Aware, and understood. That still does not justify the price the game is selling for - which is the point of this thread.

Yes, though the core attraction of ArmA has been its weapons, and assets.

Dev branch is being adjusted to fit normal build currently. Later it will be updated with a development.exe for future build test. It's almost depressing, honestly. Such a wait, and not even a single new BluFor, or OpFor jet aircraft to balance out with Independent.

If you have played the dev build of ArmA 3 there isn't anything new, sadly. So some of us are actually a little disappointed haha.

Hello, I consider myself a pretty loyal fan to BIS, and their ArmA series. I believe I own every military sim game they have put out thus far. I greatly appreciate the time, and effort they have put into keeping the ArmA community alive, as well as help build upon it. This is merely to express, and address my concern about ArmA 3's "Release" today. With the absence of any patch notes, and with the patch itself being 3.5GB, I fail to notice anything different from beta at all. The game still feels incomplete, there seems to be a lack in 'teased' vehicles such as the screen shots of the F-35's, as well as the wreck of the MV-22 Osprey model. In this release patch there are absolutely no new vehicles, or weapons that were not in the development branch. Now, do not get me wrong, this is by no means a complaint about the limited amount of vehicles - the fact is the game is still not complete at all and the price has changed to that of a full, finished game; $59.99. I have had the game since its alpha stage, so the price does not effect me personally. I just do not believe it is right to charge people for ArmA 3 with the price of a full game when it itself is clearly not. Please avoid letting your company earn a bad reputation for such a thing. Be reasonable, and honest. Do not let yourself be apart of a chain of bad releases this month, thank you.