Jump to content

PTRJK

Member
  • Content Count

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Community Reputation

10 Good

About PTRJK

  • Rank
    Private
  1. This tank as an addition to NATO forces? Atleast, maybe in a future update? 1. http://www.defensenews.com/article/20130828/DEFREG01/308280026/UK-Polish-Group-Unveils-New-Vehicle-Demonstrator 2. http://i.imgur.com/aaEFJBn.jpg The PL-01 is a light tank currently being developed by Polish (OBRUM) and British (BAE Systems) engineers. The project is expected to be finished in the next three years.
  2. I found this image on the web and I was wondering if there will still be the SAS, KSK etcetera, or has the idea been scrapped? http://www.armatog.com/wp-content/uploads/1355413881_731_FT0_arma3natointernational.jpg (794 kB)
  3. but this is not Battlefield. If you want that, go ask EA/Dice to make is so. I feel the UGV could be an exception. I wasn't saying it should be applied to all of the vehicles.
  4. DRONE ALTERATIONS: I think it would be better if when you use the turret position of the GreyHawk (UAV), you could fire the missiles yourself while the AI does its best to keep it level and circle the target you are designating. I find the UAV keeps flying away from the target I'm trying to designate, without ever turning around or it does a bouncing nose-dive when it's about to fire. Also, I think it would be better if you could control the turret and the driver position of the Stomper (UGV) simultaneously. So it would be controlled like a tank in the Battlefield game.
  5. PTRJK

    NH-90 instead of CH-49 Mohawk?

    Sure, I said "To me..." and that's why I'm asking. To see what other people's opinion is. But as the NH-90 can carry weapons it could have a similar function/capability to OPFOR's 'P0-30 Orca' which is why I thought it would make it more fitting.
  6. Do you think the NH-90 would be a better choice than the CH-49 Mohawk for green faction? To me the CH-49 Mohawk just looks ugly and bulbous and it doesn't really fit functionally and aesthetically with the rest of the units. The NH-90 looks more futuristic along with the fact it can carry weapons (rockets, cannon & door gunner). NH-90 pics: http://batfredland.free.fr/AA2003_Nh90war.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3e/Ex_Italian_Call_2011_006.jpg http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-NPaq2F5UqtA/UB0irUaBIGI/AAAAAAAAGvI/ewrTJy66Y38/s1600/AIR_NH90.jpg Perhaps if they had different versions like in the pics I posted? One a combat or tactical variant with less troop space and the other a plain troop carrier?
  7. Do you think the NH-90 would be a better choice than the CH-49 Mohawk for green faction? To me the CH-49 Mohawk just looks ugly and bulbous and it doesn't really fit functionally and aesthetically with the rest of the units. The NH-90 looks more futuristic along with the fact it can carry weapons (rockets, cannon & door gunner). NH-90 pics: http://batfredland.free.fr/AA2003_Nh90war.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...l_2011_006.jpg http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-NPaq2F5Uqt...0/AIR_NH90.jpg Perhaps if they had different versions like in the pics I posted? One a combat or tactical variant with less troop space and the other a plain troop carrier?
×