Jump to content

GottyPlays

Member
  • Content Count

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by GottyPlays


  1. So by that logic (that BI does not listen to the community) what is the point of posting all these rant threads? Surely, just like the bug tracker, they are going to ignore them?

    Aren't they?

    And for the record: my butt is far from hurt, I'm posting at the moment loling my face off at how self-entitled most people in these threads are.

    Just take a look in the mirror next time you lol for self entitled people...


  2. A new Arma game was released, and everybody was surprised and started raging because the chance of this happening was highly unlikely. They need to inform other people so they tell everybody on the internet. They still have fond memories of "Arma 1 - Game 1.0 Texture Pack" and Arma 2 1.00 Nothing-really-works-but-look-at-that-grass.

    Arma 3 sucks because engine is the same (I'm sure they just forgot to how to use that time machine), there are no cool non-Australian trucks, ships, jets from which you can frown at the many rocks (who here doesn't love the flat green scenery that is the epitome of the environment design), more hills (hills help make the map more hilly), more forests (there can never be enough of these serene places which are good for having really lots of trees), and last but not least all the shit that was never even mentioned but assumed to happen because of the power of wanting something really much.

    Arma 3 can can only be compared to some other parallel universe Arma 3 that has all the modern weaponry (but no Arma 2 reskins cause thats bad), new engine, more trucks, trains, rivers, everything from the wishlist thread and no wind mills because they kill the birds(wrong camo) and confuse the cattle which in turn produce less milk.

    Finally, everybody can get back to their favorite pastime of playing the old Arma until they forget why they hate the new one. After that, a new title is announced and the cycle is repeated.

    Expecting a polished near bug/free experience from a game that enticed QUALITY OVER QUANTITY for months after cuts and cuts? i hope you don't seriously mean that.

    if you do, i suggest you to play trespasser. that game was probably made for people like you :)


  3. Oh god people, do you really not remember what vanilla launch ArmA 2 was like? Stop bitching, go browse Armaholic for some cool content and wait for the big modders to start working/stop bitching about stupid things.

    should the arma 2 launch be as example for future releases? or they could simply do that again..


  4. One simple example: there was railgun/coilgun tank, people bitched their tits off, there is now no railgun/coilgun tank (it has a normal smooth bore cannon now).

    Proof that they "took the future out" because of the plethora of "community" bitching about the "OMG FUTURE SUCKS"

    Well, as it seems...

    The butthurt is strong even in THIS one! ;)

    DM seriously. How can you beleave such nonsense? the community isn't the ceo at BI. it's their game. they make decisions with THEIR ip.

    how can this even make sense...i repeat, the community (and not some users on a thread) spammed the tracker and voted (as requested by bis themselves)...and yet the 10 bigger bugs/features on the tracker got ignored...

    please tell me how does this make sense?

    and who says that it should been in the game in the first place? there was a shitload of stuff that did not get in the game...

    however i don't understand why cut so much content with models and textures already made? aren't they pushing for dlc's i hope..


  5. There WAS future, but all the spoiled little brats in the community complained about it, so it was cut. There you go, your future is gone because of people like you...

    This is the stupidiest post i ever read on these forums.

    You are sayin that bis admittedly dumbed down the game because forum users weren't happy about it?

    then why the top 10 bugs in the tracker aren't fixed yet? because are there by quite some time now

    hmmm really guess why...


  6. Dude for once metalcraze has a valid point (Yeah I can´t believe it either :p )

    Why make missions that cater to the Generic FPS/quick Action crowd? The Tank showcase is designed in a way that you can´t play it realistic even if you want to. I tried staying behind providing overwatch for the other tanks but the mission doesn´t seem to proceed if you are not rushing too.

    I really don't understand how they could design such bad showcases. i tried too to stay away but the commander always rushed to that damn village. and of course they got stuck in houses/rocks.

    and the infantry running over the battlefield without even aa...that's just plain ridiculous


  7. ArmA community is playing what you label as "user made crap" for years now. It's the bread and butter of ArmA. Including DayZ.

    So yeah, some people apparently like the things you don't....

    I am sorry if i have offended you, but usually people on this forum roughly act like this:

    -hey there are no good mp missions

    -stop bashing! let modders do the work!

    -hey i tried x/y/x mission in mp, but it lags and fps went on the knees!

    -stop bashing! the modder did not use good scripting!

    -then it's an engine fault?

    -Stop arguing, i run this game fine, so it MUST be your machine

    -but my machine plays well other games

    -Stop bitching, go play cod

    actually there are no missions with more than 20 ppl in it that won't suffer from the issues i described.

    i am reeeeally sorry that i have violated your personality with my post.

    however you did not respond to my question. and totally avoided everything in-between

    oh, by the way, even blue1 abandoned his project wich he put loads of efforts (and money) into it, simply because right now people can't play properly in multiplayer.

    and what the reason for naming ARMA 2 mod's in your statement is? i supposed we were talking about arma 3...


  8. odd, for me the tank showcase worked without any big problems just had to punch the commander tank once... The friendlies left their disabled tanks and got in the apc as they are supposed too.

    Thought I did not leave my tank so I could not get shoot through bushes.

    Sorry the ai that was destroying me and the squadmates not responding happened in the new Combined arms showcase, i should have mentioned that


  9. They must be super realistic, but provide a gamey island for variety reasons.

    They must get rid of any bug and performance, but failed to deliver rushed buggy content

    Like always, BI's product is THAT large that everyone has his own priority and needs, all conflicting with each others ....

    There is no doubt the product has been released too soon.

    But unlike some other studio on a game I play a lot who rushed their product unfinished end of last year, I'm far more confident in BI having a direction they want the game to go and a long term plan.

    The only problem is if the current release is going to kill ArmA III sell to the point it'll hinder its evolution.

    Is there anyone that actualy likes the problems i described?


  10. I have a question regarding the full game download: can I stay on the Dev Branch in the Steam Options and will Steam then update itseld with the full game, or do I have to opt out and then re-opt in?

    Did anyone try the new showcases?

    Yay!

    I did, i tried only two of them because i had to give up.

    Tanks blocking themselves in houses in infinite loops, friendly ai that still gets unresponsive, enemies that still can one-shot you behind some bushes...same old story for me.

    They should get rid of the commander's shouts when driving vehicules, they still spam "left!left!left!left!left!Faster!Faster!Front!Front!Front!Left!"

    Overall they should be good if they manage to fix these old bugs. I often ask myself if they even try their missions?


  11. hi,

    i am a kid and i am standing in a big toyshop and the owner says to me: hey kid you can take what ever you want u only have to give me 30 bucks.

    i look around the shop and tell him that all toycars have the same wheels and i wont take any of them because it´s copy and paste. he tells me that there is no matter to worry about the copy and pasted wheels cause lots of nice people will throw nice new toy´s into the shop and i have to wait.

    i replay to him that i am a kid and patience is not implemented yet. so i run out of the shop and damn it was the only toy shop in universe.

    open mouthed, wide open eyed starring at the forum content today and i see all is copy and paste.....

    i guess people at BIS know exactly what is going and what is not- damn they have brains (they are the brains)

    This is incredible.

    A great number of users is disappointed in wasting 30/40/60 bucks on this damn game. Myself included.

    what the hell how can people play this whitout getting mad all the times? i tried again after a couple of weeks to cooldown myself and to see if there was improvments.

    NOTHING. even on release day.

    This game wants to be good at everything, yet exels in none.

    Single player missions? a huge mess, since the ai is too damn bugged to even finish one goddamn scenario. tried again today, the tank scenario got stuck because the commander stuck itself on a house.

    on the other one i kept getting one-shotted by ai behind some bushes. in 10 minutes i had to restart twice because my squadmates won't respond.

    Multi player? nope. there are no official servers so we have to play user made crap.

    tried benny's cti and this should be the best server to play on it has even an "headless client" (another copy of the game to buy, just to be right with the customers) that should help in limiting the tremendous amount of bad fps and should help to fix ai...well desync everywhere, huge warping of people, planes freezing in mid air for 5 minutes 20 to 10 fps WITH ONLY 30 PLAYERS IN and vehicules randomly exploding..i could go on for minutes..

    i'm here from alpha, and i played on loads of different servers, no improvements whatsoever.

    Editor? how i am supposed to use it? i don't want to learn how to script just to change my loadout.

    Graphics? Gorgeous. But they still have to fix the fps. it's incredibly good looking but this engine should push a hell more frames.

    They wanted us to get in the feedback tracker, yet after 4 months of bugtesting for free this huge mess the top 10 tickets are still "Assigned" this is a kick in the balls, obviously IHMO

    Then there is the copy paste of assets, removal of the medic, still no fix for that goddamn fatigue level, the recoil is so damn high that my uncle with parkinson could shoot better han these soldiers. yet the bigger calibers like the anti material rifles don't have a kick when they shoot. Then i heard that they fixed the clunkiness of the soldiers...well they tried. still have to wait more than 45 seconds when i pick up a launcher from an ammobox just because im stuck in 4 pointless animations. I can't even switch guns while walking (i don't know why since in dayz you can)

    And i still have to find a reason to all of that underwater gameplay.

    "But! we got altis!" yeah we got this huge gigantic map...that we can't play on properly.

    I got used to people like you that try to defend this nonsense for whatever reason that i still don't understand.

    This game should not be sold right now.

    And before the old "hey if you don't like it don't buy it" argument i'd like to point out that i bought this game since i liked a lot a2 and expeted a huge progression over arma 3. and usually games nowadays don't troll customers like this.

    Then your argument it's pathetic at best, it's more like "hey i sell to you this brand new car! it's better than the old model! what? the wheels? well those will come later! why don't you just use taxi meanwhile?"

    I don't care if i get infractions for this post, since i belive that these threads are here for a purpose, and i see users that try to defend bis as huge trolls.

    if all of you are happy with the product i'm ok with it. if you try to close our mouths because you feel entitled to do so, then there are problems.

    i would gladly appreciate to know what plans BIS have to fix all of this, if they have any. Just to know when i should get back in this game again.

    I'd rather play a half finished but working game for 10 months than just sit and wait for the same time.

    It is still an option to buy the game in March 2014 with full campaign and content. The naming (alpha-beta-full) is useless for a product like this, but many people needs this as an indication of some sort.

    All of this rage on the forums could be avoided if BIS would realize that this game was not ready.

    All of this OBVIOUSLY IHMO


  12. So you measure the price of full release with the price of the beta/alpha? That's not how the "Early access" works dude! It was a deal to save some money, if you preorder arma full release. Alpha and beta was a gift for this preorder. With your argumentation somebody could say "Hey, ArmA3 costs 42 Euro, but in 2 years, it will be on a steamdeal for 10 Euro, so it's totaly unfair to charge people now with 42 Euro, if the game is only wort 10 Euro in 2 years".

    A lot of games has this kind of pricing model nowadays. Save money for preorder and get alpha/beta access.

    That was not preorder at all.

    1. If it was a pre order, we should have paid the full price back then.

    2. A preorder can be cancelled, yet i could not cancel the pre order. it's not the first time i pre order games, i already cancelled a couple of pre orders last year at gamestop

    Basically we bought the game 4 months ago. Call it alpha call it omega the game it's still the same.

    The fact that the cost go up near release, it's totally normal marketing, they simply wanted people to buy the game (almost unplayable) early at a lower price to support more the developing process.

    And before the fanboys attacks

    OBVIOUSLY IHMO


  13. So it's the futuristic approach that actually hitted hard on content-wise. People might be happy with this amount of vehicles if some of the vehicles wouldn't be just copy and paste weaponry. Vehicles look cool and fresh but some variety is needed.

    i think instead, that the futuristic approach is a tactic to minimize the effort in dev terms, like the weapons...how can we complain that the mxm (for example) is not simulated so well? its difficult to find users that have actually tried these guns (if these guns actually even exist, im still not sure but this is ot) ...now they have the excuse (i cant find other words really) to do whatever they want with the ballistics, and the result is same exact behavior for various faction weapons. if they stuck with the good old arma 2 assets, they had to spend more time to fix ballistics for every weapon.

    and the same goes for the vehicles i think, why try to replicate existing vehicles when they could "re-invent" other ones as they please?

    this IMHO is why we have content like this now.

    I'm sure the missile for the Opfor anti air vehicle is just a placeholder.. LOL

    http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/903258706275147639/A1BCA55352B5E9FEC7923C34D6DC8DDFB07F785B/

    Wow! that's why vehicles have so few ammo.


  14. Wait, i was asking this myself. didn't the devs always say that by pre ordering the game we got full access to alpha and beta right? so if this is a preorder, dow do we cancel it? i mean, it's not actually a refund, and if the game did not came out yet...how does it work?

    im sure i even read a couple of post by some users about this, anyone?

×