Zergra

you should be very very afraid. Those are two nations, NUCLEARnations, who have engaged in open warfare and are willing to do so again, as their generals have expressed a will to do. I'd like to see something in South America. Probably involving Brazil as they are rising to new economic and military heights.

what about India vs Pakistan. A realistic flashpoint in modern times.

We just need sides with different strengths. That's what I'm talking about. Or would you rather have it be Call of Duty or Battlefield where the only difference between the sides is the camo they are wearing. Can't you detect the sarcasm of my post? That first one was not serious. It was the message under it I was serious.

What I meant was that BIS is making both sides uniform. There's no big difference in the asssets of OPFOR and BLUFOR. I did not ask for superpowerfull vehicles. Did you not notice the tone I as writing in. or the "on a serious not" thing. I was not serious. Now NATO and CSAT are basically the same army. Same vehicle weapons, largely the same vehicles. (Drones making me think "What?"). What i want is asymmetricall gameplay. And yes, we need transport planes. that I can fully agree on.

What about a futuristic A-10? I mean, can anyone say no to 30mm of LIBERTY and 'MURICA?m Its the future too..... so why not 40mm. On a serious note, BIS talkn of keeping the sides balanced isn really making the sides more boring. EVery side has their advantages and disadvantages. These disadvantages should not be the same.

As Altis is soon released.(The 26th) can we expect a massive drop in performance. I got a average of 30 FPS on Stratis WIth wiewdistance 2000. I mght be buying a new comp if my current one can't handle altis

pretty sure there was talk of bandits, I.E independent. Independent are probably gonna be rebels and bandits. Those are probably gonna be your ak wielding thugs. And I am glad we have a game where we have high-tech NON-WESTERN countries. Yes the helmet looks funny but that is about it.