Jump to content

ventu121

Member
  • Content Count

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by ventu121


  1. Yeah it could be: in a closed community. ArmA and its mods are accessible to anyone who buy the game, even to bad people. I think it is better to keep it the way it is. Me too would love to play VBS or any other military trainer simulator and I agree with you that a bigger community wuold improve both ArmA 3 and military trainiers, but it is too dangerous in my idea.
    Anyway BIS should improve the ArmA engine expecially for vehicles.

    The only thing I could suggest is military team training against selected ArmA gruoups. We all know the most mil-sims groups are playing with real-world tactics and most of present tactics are on the clean and dark net; so why not having military versus ArmA teams on VBS facing each other? Not just competition but a real mission with human enemies that thinks different form an IA. 

    Like ineptaphid said that would be something for BIS and the various companies to agree on: a closed community.


  2. Em about 10-20 countries are set to acquire the F35, its a NATO platform meaning its for sale to any NATO country. 

     

    Besides Britain, because of our "special relationship" are able to build D.O.D property such as the F15C, D and SE whereas everyone else has to have it imported (even though we dont use the F15) 

     

    Italy is manufacturing F35s parts, not only for itself but also for US and all the other countries. Still Italy can build it's own F35. And the software its only property of Lockheed Martin. 


  3. B1 and B2 are good and I don't think they should be removed but I think they need some improvements like the possibility to drop all the bombs at once and something for precision striking for the dumb bombs. 

    (If all this it's already done I'm sorry for the usless post).

    if you want to resize the pack you can put them like "Standalone" mods.

×