Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

dontpKaniC

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    10

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by dontpKaniC

  2. Posted

    and if you look through the pages of this thread, you would've gotten your answer and on that, I was pointing you in the right direction. :rolleyes: Typical... but glad you finally got you're answer.

    Why point me in the right direction if you could just tell me? There are 45 pages in this thread, do you seriously expect me to read through all of that to get a simple answer?

    All I'm saying is, since you bothered to answer, you could just answer me straight away, and not send me on a "hunt" for the answers.

  9. Posted

    The thing is here, there are new features that appear to have been sensibly put in place by devs wanting to stay true to the original formula. It's quite different in ways while also staying true at it's core. The addition of more vehicles isn't a bad one but CC's design works on the basis it was informed from. Simply adding more effectively changes the type of game it is. Personally I like the two vehicle approach as much as I like the idea of more vehicles but changing it up so drastically this way means CC could become something else

    Anyway BI's work is sold as a reimagining of CC and with that comes respect of what it is people love of the original. For fans generally it's expected that core remains

    Hopefully CC will be successful enough to allow another in the series that possibly explores the aspect of more, providing it doesn't sacrifice CC's charm- I mean it's easy to imagine a Command+Conquer style game in this way but for many would result in a different game altogether

    Firstly, sorry if my first comment came out a little violent and assaulting, I didn't mean it to be that way.

    Secondly, I am a fan of a lot of deep strategy games, and I absolutely LOVE micromanagement. I like to fine-tune the smallest details and make things fit exactly my play-style. For me, more units would add to the strategic and tactical decisions I would need to make in-game.

    I still don't really agree with you, because in my opinion, adding something new to a game that makes it better and more fun, even if it doesn't completely follow the formula of the original, is still a good thing to do, because, lets face it, we want a good game and not a blind re-creation of the original.

    For me, as long as the feature makes the game more enjoyable and deep, it is worth implementing even if it differs from the original.

    Besides, I doubt that adding more units to the game is such a drastic change. It's not like the core game-play will change as a result.

  10. Posted

    ADROPACRICH2, you are talking complete nonsense!!!

    "betraying the original"?! I don't see how adding more variety to a great game and making it even better will be "betraying the original"! Remake or not, this is a new game, and it has to have new features. If you are so nostalgic that you will reject features that will make the game better, you shouldn't bother with a remake and just stick with the original game.

×