Booster

Really? I thought it looked very realistic, fast and fluid just like in real life, it's not robotic-looking and slow anymore.

Maybe the recording software had an impact on the FPS, FRAPS has a significant impact on my FPS when the I use higher graphics settings.

Your ideas are desirable, but in reality they are unpractical. Even sophisticated AI are no match for human intelligence, especially in a game with an enormous scope like Arma3, so it's very important to give the AI unrealistic advantages to compensate for their weaknesses, otherwise the AI will be unable to offer human opponents a serious challenge, and people are already complaining that the AI isn't 'smart' enough.

When I seen the new muzzle flashes I got an uncontrollable erection that just won't go down! The short firefight at the end was sweet and the enemies animations were so lifelike they were hard to differentiate from real soldiers, the ragdoll animations really added to the realism. Night scenes were epic, Arma3's graphics already look so sharp it makes all the big-name FPS games look laughable. Edit: I almost forgot to mention the underwater scenes (still too excited about the muzzle flashes) the underwater environment looks spectacular, I'm certain that people who don't even normally play games like Arma will be very impressed with how immersive it looks.

That's completely absurd. But it made me lol!

hmmm, well we know it won't be another nuclear tipped scud, maybe this time it's a multiple warhead nuke with an incredibly large strike range.

Perhaps Bohemia's vision of future warfare isn't so outrageous after all, take a look at what former Operation Desert Storm hospital commander and DARPA researcher Dr Richard Satava envisions warfare will be like 20 or 30 years from now. "he's sitting in an office in Washington operating a surgical robot which is poised to operate on a solider wounded in Afghanistan 10800 kilometres away. That soldier has life-threatening injuries and to prevent blood loss or damage to his organs, he is injected with a solution that puts him into a temporary state of suspended animation. He needs an organ transplant, so Satava instructs the computer built into the surgical robot to print one using the soldier's stem cells." http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/technology/technology-news/the-outrageous-surgeon-20120601-1zlqx.html

Watch the 2nd soldier's helmet and take note of how it changes color because of the sun's glare. They are all wearing helmets.

It's just your eyes, it's a helmet. You'll never be a sniper cause your eyesight is terrible

This link will take you to a page with a link that cautions Warning! The images you are about to see may be disturbing. Click here to continue. The link on the warning page will open a photo gallery of simulated amputee casualties. Have a good hard look at the realistically simulated amputations, then have a good hard think about why it is essential to simulate similar disturbing scenarios in Arma 3. LINK REMOVED

Can't argue with that logic, but what do I get for being right?

If your already having trouble coming to terms with the new physx simulation and animation system then you will be rendered motionless in amazement with the AI improvements. A revolution is an understatement.

Not sure why all the hostility so Im not saying anymore until after E3

Game developers session 2011 in Prague, not GDC. I'm an artist, it was invite only, and the presentation focused on new animation systems.

They changed all the animations.

I don't know but he said the explosion effect underwater will be different than explosion effect on land. They showed a video of infantry throwing grenades into some caves but it didn't show the explosion because it was inside the caves but the sound was good like a deep boom echoing out from the cave entrances.

Not wind, but what he said was a explosion on land would have a different effect than a explosion in underwater environment.

I can tell you that it looks much better in arma 3 because the cars panels actually compress and crinkle when the tank track crushes them and the glass smashes in the windscreens and windows.

I thought they confirmed that they are using physx long ago so I didn't think this would be a surprise to anyone. They are using ragdoll too for injured and dead infantry and said physx takes into consideration stuff like weight and density and air resistance and gravity. they showed some infantry get shot when running and they fell down forwards in the direction they were running because of the momentum from running, its looks good I think people will like the ragdoll. you can make infantry limping if you shoot them in leg but i am going offtopic now.

They are if you dare to change the precisionFriendly/precisionEnemy/UltraAI values. Don't complain about the AI if you don't have the balls to give them some teeth.

I can't think of any reason why they will suddenly drop the physx stuff it would be a waste not to use it now because it looks good. I don't know how armor on tanks will look when damaged but car panels just crushed beneath the tanks tracks and it made like a loud crunching noise so they should keep it. When the tank drove through the houses it looked nice because there was lots of smoke and some big chunks of wall falling but the chunks do dissapear when the smoke dissapears but it still looks real nice.

You people here are so out of touch with what gamers wan't that it's almost a joke, yep all of you, even the developers. If you want to compete you need FIREFIGHTS . That's really how simple it is, most people want lengthy FIREFIGHTS and for some peculiar reason BIS never ever advertise firefights in their videos. How you going to compete if you aint even going to show some good firefights. hUl6z0G59Ew&feature=related

What were you expecting to learn here? Vanilla is the pizza base, but everyone believes that their favourite topping tastes best!