fluttershy

I think you will rather get Crabs on the battlefield then having someone shot trough a weaponscope. Why would anyone even aim at such a low-profil target? A full penetration killshot trough a scope is more like winning the lottery - 3 times in a row. Thats the same as asking for System Malfunctions on Targeting-Systems or anything of that microscopic chance to happen, it is possible but very very unlikely to happen, therefor we shouldnt ask for things that you might not even see once happening in A3 during a game-span of more then 5 years.

OP - i know it is a stupid question but: How many USB devices are connected to your machine, are you using any kind of USB Hub? Dont get me wrong, you might not experiance the delay on any other game, but it could be the source of your problem. I think due to your System-Specs frame drops should not be the problem at hand. Another idea: add -cpuCount=4 to your startup parameters, ArmA 3 might not recognize all cores on your machine, therefor you have to gently tell it ^^. Other than that, try and monitor your system parameters while running A3 and see if there is any particular spike during the missions where you encounter the issue.

Well there has to be a "hunger meter" which is also editable via an init line, so you can create more interisting scenarios. Especially Mission-Types like MSO with a presisent database will benefit from this.

Though Careful - using a Mod-weapon other dont have will also remove your fireing sound for allys and might cause unneeded server-errors.

Great work so far Austin, dang i wish i could model well -_-. Maybee take a look at Alwarrens FHQ M4 or ask him for the fire selector animation he build in. On a side note: thats a 16 inch Barrel isnt it? - picky milsim roflcopters will tell you it shall be 14,5 inch instead of 16 but dont worry, i like em as they are ^^

Have you tried the regular 6.5 supressor?

I think he is talking about a custom supressor, with custom Model and config.

An the removal of most burlap on the front, at least i did not use that much on the front, on the upper part yes but the legs were mostly free on the front since you are prone when it matters anyway ^^. From a technical standpoint they look way better then what we had before in arma, the Suits though still look like the fancy ones you buy in shops to be "ze paintball snip0r". Real-Life Ghillies get handcrafted by the Operators.

Gosh why does BI keep creating such Ghillie units -_- i have not yet seen any Sniper build a Ghillie like that, therefor, i will need a modler it seems ^^. Still very nice find g00d

Jub, i would say thats it.

So i created my retexture for our group and now i am looking to add in a Crate that will hold all different uniforms and is placeable within the Editor for simple use. My issue is: apperently i can not find the respective commands to make them appear. I looked into several Weaponbox configs but could not find anything related to items. My current Config code looks like this: class CfgVehicles { class NATO_Box_Base; class STA_Clothes_box: NATO_Box_Base { scope = 2; vehicleClass = "Items"; //unsure if correct displayName = "ST-Alpha Clothing Crate"; model = "\A3\weapons_F\AmmoBoxes\WpnsBox_F"; icon = "iconCrateWpns"; class TransportItems { //TransportWeapons,TransportMagazines works TransportItems does not class _xx_stafg_tundra { item = "stafg_tundra"; //base class for uniform count = 20; }; }; }; So my issue is the Parameter TransportItems, i tried TransportWeapons as well as TransportMagazines which i was able to find on the BIWIKI but that did not work as planned. Is there a possible work-around or way to fix this? - I really do not want to fill the crate via Script as ease of use is the most important right now. Does anyone know how to?

problem solved. In order to make it work i have to place weapon definitions on the items. So pretty much rework my whole config, but it will be worth it i think.

Hi Apilion, no there is no fix for this and there will most likely never be one, i know which section you mean and i can imagine what you are trying to do but with the UV-Setup that was put down for the current A3 Alpha units there wont be any workarround for your issue. If you notice in the original Clothing1_co.paa there is a secondary pouche just like the one that is used, to the upper left corner of the sleeve that is used, but sadly, that areas does not have any UV attachment.

Check your Color settings and brigthness with the original textures. Apperently the reflection values of the default B_Soldier_F are a bit higher then they were in A2. I had to tone down the brightness in my textures as well. The little extra work will get you a long way though.

fred64 - you might have single handedly added something to A3 - or be in the ability to to so, that will make the game so much more worth it, even in this very early stage. I would like to thank you for putting in that much effort. To be willing to share your work and time within this community is not only an advancement for you, but for everyone that enjoys arma only since recently but also for old arma veterans.

Maybee you should take a look at our reskin again, then look at either the original file by BIS or some Photoreference from the web, i am sure the camo will not just run trough seames and pockets without changing the slightest. I know it requires a lot more work to do it properly but the quallity of your final texture will defenitly benefit.

Your Norwegian Camo seems to ignore different parts of the uniform and just keeps going "trough" them without changing. Maybee some more indepth looks would help to make it more appealing and realistic. And for eyecandy, maybee a flag that looks like this http://www.camotech.com/Images/NORWAY%20FULL%20SUBDUED.jpg for the Vest. Then add up some dirt and distress to the clothing and your sittin pretty ^^.

Hmmm i think i can try and get my hands on aridFleck for you. But i am sure seamless won't be an option i can deliver. Still interisted?

would you tell us? - or just me ^^

Amazing tool for Roomclearing, medium range gets difficult though, very nice resamblance.

Very nice work. I will give em a combat spin. Oh and keep going: We armalovers need our customized chocolate ^^

The only one i found and could offer is this http://fotobg.ru/upload/img1348220422.jpg You will have hard issues to find a seamless pattern of it. Due to possible reproduction of the actual pattern thoose are a well kept secret. Especially since the pattern is US-Military serviced you will have an even harder time to recive a proper version from the producer of the pattern. I for once worl with a smaller company that actually produces camo patterns, so that was my way to get to a seamless pattern. Also, i do not know if you have a Template or if you work on a live file but i could lend you some of mine, would add a little more contrast and possible depth.

I was simply saying that we are looking into the matter of the Hand-Anim because it is clipping trough the RIS on the left side, because of the currently used hand-anim. Since the EBR has a Handanim that only grabs the weapon by the foregrip that could potentially fix the issue. And no, i do not thing Alwarren is looking to include a rifle to the pack that has nothing todo with the m4 and is already featured in the game.

Well if you would remodel the M4 to be the new Colt Advanced Piston Carbine you have flip up sights that should not obsturct your vision even with a PEQ on top. But then again - would not be an m4 anymore. http://i577.photobucket.com/albums/ss216/art1stu/DSCF5719.jpg or maybee the PEQ-15 is to big in the model. It should be possible to use the ironsights, but obstruction would be there.

The Animations are currently work in progress. We are testing the Mk 14 EBR hand-anim and maybee have to consult about a custom hand-anim in order to remove the clipping effect.