NeuroFunker
-
Content Count
2231 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
-
Medals
-
Posts posted by NeuroFunker
-
-
64 Bit exe is unnecessary IMO. What would be good would be if a maxmem switch of 4096 was allowed so that those of us with 64 Bit Windows could have the maximum address space available to the application. Surely this would be quick to implement?well, what you think, it isn't yet implemented then?
-
how to explain, my system commit ram usage gose up to 8gb from 12gb, when playing arma 3, when it's usualy 3,3gb at idle, when i browsing inet? Btw it's pointless to say "more then 4gb ram won't change anything, cause arma 3 using 2 gb of ram" Not in my case, when my system uses 3gb at idle. So at least 1 gb goes in to page file, slowing down your system and the game itself.
-
Yeah it's sad to say the least. A far cry from how the forums used to be. They were never perfect by any means, but they were never this bad.---------- Post added at 22:56 ---------- Previous post was at 22:55 ----------
You don't understand the whole concept of the argument you are even arguing at this point.
do i? mmkay. Won't bother you explaining it to me.
-
yep, it's so obviosly, when you are having 120 fps in bf3, you should have the same in arma 3 as well!
-
well, its either me or you, don't undrstand what a pssimist is.
-
Lumping everyone with an issue into some generic "whiner" label and treating them as such and a general bad attitude and hostile manner towards posts that are critical of BI and towards posters critical of BI. I'm quite content with my manners, I'm not the one who's manners are in question either.i'm not labering everyone as a "whiner". People like to repeat same stuff over and over here, and make false testaments like multiplayer is dying fast, or "arma 3 enginge is ancient i have 40 fps with my uber hightd pc, cause i have 120 fps in battlefield"- a like threads. This is what made me tired, reading same stuff, but instead in one thread, in dozens of selfcopying.
.
-
You can say the same about both sides, actually. Because valid points are always countered with the same non-arguments.A good idea then, would be to counter the same threads over and over again, if you want to, with the same arguments. But the key is arguments. Like, for example (getting back to the topic), you say "Statistics say otherwise anyway.?" about the dying MP topic. What statistics ? Numbers ? The only numbers I have seen here are from someone who counters the idea of a healthy MP. So if he can come up with numbers, why can't you ? That's exactly what I mean. If you think it's not so bad with MP, show numbers. Then you have a basis for comparison... "Statistics say otherwise" doesn't say anything at all
I don't know. Maybe quote the statics or provide a link to it ?
well, if you would read few paged back, there were your statictics. http://arma3.swec.se/game/statistics
If you think the same way, that musltiplayer is dying fast, reading that minimum player graph, shows actually the minimum amunt of player has risen in past month. How is this rilevant to "multiplayer is dying fast" nonsense?
-
Well what he was getting at is that it's fine if you want to contradict or argue someone's post or position with, you know facts. Just because you're pissed off that negativity gets repeated though doesn't mean you need to lump all valid complaints and criticism into one big pot and then shit all over it simply because you're ticked off. Who cares if you want to argue the fact Multiplayer is dying or not, just try doing it with some courtesy and respect.In what way was i disrespectful? I'm not pissed and shit here, maybe you need at least learn some manners instead?
-
we need more people like you op, BIS has no clue about their game and engine, you are literary opening their eyes on their own product.
-
What can you say ?Well, i can tell you what you apparently can NOT say : "Solid arguments ".
"Go back to CoD" ? LoL, really ? I mean SERIOUSLY ?
:D:D:D:
Besides, if you click my youtube link you can see i'm not CoD.
doesn't mean your not BF eaither...
p.s. so ive clicked your youtube link, so yeah, bf all the way, enjoy your epic 120fps on epic 2km² maps, with epic 500m view distance. I'll stay with my shitty 40 fps, tiny 270km²map, crappy 3,5km view distance, and boring and "dying fast multiplayer" with 100+ people matches. I think we are done here.
-
Apologies to Neurofunker, this isn't directed specifically at you, but:It seems some people don't understand the basic idea behind those "pessimists" on the forum.
People are concerned about some aspect of the game they like. Yes, they LIKE the game. Why else would they bother. You "optimists" always think that when people complain about the game, they hate it. This is wrong.
Now, if someone says that multiplayer performance is bad, they are concerned about this particular topic. They try to point out that this is a point that needs to be addressed. That doesn't mean the criticism is hateful or meant to belittle the effort of the developers. It's for the most part a form of feedback. What is more damaging is the blind defense and downplay of actually existing problems. THIS is counter-productive. Not the constructive criticism. (And note, I'm not judging whether MP is dying or not).
Besides, this forum is NOT meant to be a duck waggling contest about who likes Arma 3 more. The stupid name calling on both sides ("whinier", "hater", "fanboy") and the fruitless bashing of every kind of criticism makes discussion here totally worthless and just drives people away.
This:
tells me enough about this particular attitude. Evey type of "pessimism" is thrown into one big pot, stirred, and labeled.
People, start a discussion if you think that someone is wrong. You know, with arguments, data, numbers, whatever you can come up with. If you can't come up with anything, don't bother posting. Don't turn every kind of criticism (or praise, for that matter) into a pissing contest. Believe it or not, we are all here for the same damn reasons, and that's because we like Arma.
that all, doesn't cover the fact, people repeat all the same things over and over, in selfcopying threads. They seem to be lazy or something, to read the forums, where it's being discussed for ages, instead making all the same therads, all the same posts. I'm not denying that arma has it's flaws, and like in everything on our damn world, there is no limit for perfection!
And back to thread: multiplayer dying FAST!, is that true or false at the end? From my perspective, it's not, actually it's living up more and more. Statistics from arma2.swec also show it. Whats the point in discussing here further then?
-
^ Disable SSAO and caustics, you won't notice a difference and gain a considerable fps boost, PIP maybe to standard too.Also I might suggest turning the FSAA to 2x and increasing the AA in Nvidia Control Panel to 16x or 32x CSAA.
if you replace games AA with from nvidia control panel, there no need to set 2x in game i think. Eaither in game or nvidia panel.
-
kinda weird, reading stuff like that from a moderator. Anyway, i agree, that low terrain settings, if set by hoster, can be used as wallhack, since you see behind a hill, which is actually there with high and beyond terrain details.
-
mst likekely, after adapt and win episodes will release. Just currious, what next island it could be? Something tells me it could be Iran, or some mid east area.
-
Oh really ?In the editor in the desert @ 800x600 res ?
Cool , cool.
But what about multiplayer bro ? Domination coop for instance . Anything with a little A.I present.
@ DNK
Yes, SSD should have an impact on performance in THIS game, because for some reason this piece of software is unable to actually use your RAM for what it's supposed for, and seems to draw EVERYTHING from the hard drive.
Arma 3 says : "Whoops, got to give that house some textures ... hmm now where did i put those ... ah screw it i'll just take 5 seconds to find it on the harddrive > PLOP SCREECH CRANK, there we go" . (3 second lag)
Just like it was in Arma 2 . But then again, this game essentially IS arma 2 . Except with new skins for vehicles and weapons.
This game is like a skin-mod for Arma 2 , really nothing more.
dude what can i say, maybe go back to cod or bf, wherever you come from, and enjoy your 120 fps? Or better don't you actually kind of amusing person.
-
well th op is obviosly, former cod and bf player, who used to play "i must repeat that billions of times" 1x1km sized maps, with 500m view disatnce. He can't simply figure out, maybe bad maths in school? What 270km² are. He can't figure out, all of the missions and servers, aren't bis official servers, with official missions. Are mostlikely selfbuild pcs, not the most powerful ones, with custom missions, with tons of custom scripts, and aren't mostly well or optimized at all. Yes not knowing all that, can be frustrating, but what can BI do all all this? Forbid server hosting with custom missions, so people won't get frustrated? Allow only hosting for good pc builds? Allow only BIS "mission quality pass" or something? Just yelling "my uber highend pc, has 40 fps" won't help mch. And for 100th time, i'm playing with my clan from a3rc.com comunity, where we are having 100+ players pvp games, without lags and stable performance. I guess, we are having some "special arma 3 build" with +200% performance, 100% 4 core cpu and gpu usage, and -100 pings?
---------- Post added at 20:23 ---------- Previous post was at 20:19 ----------
With 63 other players? Generally a slide show.And what about fluid 100 players games, i'm playing?
-
well, if multiplayer dying in someones opinnion, then let him think so, maybe don't play it, or wats up? Why someone needs to prove its dying anyway, what weirdness is that? Statistics say otherwise anyway.
Arma 3 - badly optimized.
Arma 3 - dumbed down
Arma 3 - lack of content
Arma 3 - my uber highend pc not gud for arma
Arma 3 - multiplayer is dying
I wonder, why so many pessimists on this forums anyway?
-
anyway, we got enough trubleshooting threads, i guess we already figured out, petition is useless here and devs kinda replied about that too.
-
this happens, if iti set lower then very high quality terrain details. Better use lower view distance and increase terrain details, then cracking up view distance, but lowering the terrain disatnce for performance. I seem not to have that prob.
-
yes yes yes, omg yess! ;) Finally you are back, was following you since arma 2, when you started to work on it! Love distant filtering and forest echo! Damn!
-
Then the thread should be called differently, and not problems and solutions, and would beong to addon discussion thread, wouldn't it?Most of the time physx has nothing to do with realism.
Why woulld BI do a M4 remake?
should, because of what, you say so?
-
gather a group of people, who interrested to work together, on a project based on arma 2 samples.
-
again you missed what i wrote , read my last line, THINK ... read AGAIN ... THINK AGAIN ... repeat as may times as needed if you don't get it yet"bohemia "introllactive" at it's finest ;) Keep rocking guys!!
---------- Post added at 01:19 ---------- Previous post was at 01:17 ----------
Wrong, this is NOT what the OP suggested. Moreso, if you really want to work on quality content (a3 level and above), one would better start from scratch.If you brought this up now, hardly anyone actually butthurt besides the OP. You can always check the lad's post history to make yourself an opinion about it.
why should i stalk after anyone, i liked the idea he suggests here, as far as i could understand, no more or less...
-
I play BF3 @ 120 fps , lightboost enabled. (NO motion blur whatsoever, CRT quality)Then i try this game ... dear god :-(
i play BF4 with low setting and its stuttering even then. When arma 3 runs stable on ultra with 3,5k view distance. But ofcourse, arma 3 is really badly optimized. Nothing like having huge maps of 1x1 km size, with 500m view distance compared to armas 3, tiny 270km² map, and "can't see firther then my own nose" 10km view distance...
*Petition for performance optimization patch!*
in ARMA 3 - TROUBLESHOOTING
Posted
then you are doing something wrong mate, we have similar rigs, im able to play arma 3 on ultra 40-50 fps. Don't blame the game (only)