Wiki

Hardly think so

I said I was kidding. I need to find something to fill my mind and ArmA 3 is not the answer, unfortunately. I leave steam too, I will stop ArmA - I got other things up in my clusterfucked mind right now. Thx for the support though ;-)

If I had a 9mm, I would lol (just kidding) Thanks

I'm stopping a bit more than that. It's a bit more complicated that just time eating problems. I can deal with that, not with my current situation.

Well, it's more girls issues... Much more complicated than anything else in this whole fucking world.

Deleted

He meant: in ArmA 2, the Khe Sahn on Utes coudn't be moved at all. He asks whether people prefer a placeholder on the map or an object that can be placed wherever the mission maker wants it.

I don't think so. Plus, this animation (MOCAP view) was in the roadmap 2017 first. It would have been a very bad move from BIS to show that in the video (and they know the community analyzes them a lot) just for an April fool.

I was just pointing out the reason why (IMHO) BIS was criticized for Apex. As everyone else here, I hope they will be a carrier indeed. But that's ain't up to BIS, it's B01 :-)

It would have been a good idea to add a mission or a situation in which this choice matters.

Yes unfortunately.

I think the last video presenting the Jets DLC and the rest is good. It shows us what we can expect with the Jets DLC, so it's fine. They can't show us the rest as it's not even WIP, but I don't mind. However, I think BIS PR was criticized (and I was one of the 1st one to do it) about APEX because they didn't deliver enough information at all about what to expect. There was a big lack of communication. The thing is, IMHO, that some people were disappointed when Apex is released because, as we didn't have any information, we couldn't figure out what to expect. Hence some people may have expected or imagined a lot of things that didn't happen to be. More information about what is coming = less imagination / expectations for the player. Of course, some guys may be disappointed because there is not what they want, but it's better to know it BEFORE instead of discovering it AFTER. That is, IMHO, one of the biggest mistake BIS ever did.

Oh damn! Some other leaked pictures of the next Call of Duty!!! Oh wait... ;-)

Good to know, good to go. :-) Get some! ;-)

Well, you're already at Mach 1. Quite fast already, isn't it?

I would better give my 2 cents on the war repporter

New mission released! The Snake Bite A CSAT team is dispatched as QRF to help an AAF convoy. http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=892891552 or https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1479331987 Enjoy!!! And don't forget to rate it! 😉

Well, it's still not

Looks like Market Garden

SITREP I'm working on a new mission, CSAT side. Mission name is "the snake bite".

The view of the Y-32 Xi'An VTOL not centered when zooming in Feedback ticket https://feedback.bistudio.com/T124066

But I think your AT guys doesn't have a PCML, he's got the other missile launcher which causes more damages. You should take that one instead.

I was talking about the other AT launcher... can't remember the name. You just need to order your AT guy to drop it and you pick it up instead.

You have an AT guys when you take command and he has a missile launcher, not a PMCL. use it instead, it will destroy the tank. However, as I always destroyed the tank without the artillery, I dunno whether it has an impact after or not. I tried once and the guerilla guy was angry, but that's all. I don't think there is any consequence as you don't fight with the FIA later, so...

You also could say that when we have a release date, if it does change, it will always to be delayed.