Wiki

From what we know, it could be both possibilities, period. We have no information whatsoever to know whether it's the 1st or 2nd explanation. "You know nothing John Snow"

Ahah yeah bro. But that is a different situation IMO. Bush administration wanted to go in and invade Iraq. Trump administration just sent a message meaning "don't piss me off and don't fuck with us."

IMHO, although we don't have all the info to have a proper point of view, I think Trump wouldn't have engaged the US forces in that strike if he didn't have solid evidence.

Please, can we keep that thread civilized?

Hey guys, take a deep breath and calm down. For the moment, we have no evidence whatsoever. We can only assume what happened and make hypothesis, nothing more.

I thought is was the cake instead.

Hey mate, I think I upset you. It's just a misunderstanding. I didn't say there was a secret agenda of US. I just don't know. All I'm saying is we don't have all the informations. I agree, it's most likely Damascus who did that attack though. At the very moment, we all take for granted what the anti Assad say and not what Moscow think about that. It just feel like at a trial, the jury would only listen to the DA and not the counselor. See what I mean? Then again, sorry if I upset you, didn't mean that ;-)

Sorry, it's off topic but: Ukraine and Crimea: Crimea people voted join Russian Federation. 'It's illegal!' Oh, really? How about the right of people to decide by themselves? Democracy? You know, what western countries usually fight for? Oh yes, it doesn't work when there is no advantage for them. Ianoukovitch, elected president of Ukraine (so, it was democracy, right?) who had to leave because of a coup (which is illegal UFN). The western countries applaused a lot and they said 'this is democracy!' Seriously?

Concerning the Ukrainian situation, I would be more careful. Western countries have been very hypocrites about it.

They said the syrian AF didn't drop WMD but they hit some compounds in which, unfortunately, there were some hidden. Collateral damages.

Everyone seems to think that it was an attack ordered by Damascus. Even if it most likely is, we still have no proof ATM. The explanation given by Damascus and Moscow (although with few chance to be the right one) is not impossible either.

According to the TV news, 58 Tomahawks missiles have been fired

Hi guys. Just to announce I totally retire from ArmA 3 and ArmA 3 editing. God speed to all of you and to missions / addons / mods maker: keep making such a nice work! BIS: big thanks for your games.

Nope. I've kind of sorted some things out but it ain't over yet :(

Thx. I just tried to have things sorted out tonight - epic win! :) (for some of them at least) Edit: a lot of people are just AW with no morality. It's so good when you find that out and have your mind back in the right state! Edit 2: thanks for your help and support guys Edit 3: never trust a girl and never let her invade your brain

Thx mate

Thx mate. Good luck for your (awesome) work on CUP!

Yeah sure

They're more lethal than an explosive 12.7x99 or an armor piercing 5.56x45 ahah

Thanks for your kind words guys. I may come back to you when all my IRL things are settled - but I fear it won't be in any near future. "People think it's the flames that make hell unbearable. It's not. It is the absence of love."

Thanks. Although I doubt this future is as ideal as I expected

Thx buddy

Thx

Thx mates

Thanks mate