AlexVestin

Well, the 'texturing' part is not the problem at all. The process of getting the files ingame is the tricky area. Indeed! Thanks you! I haven't read through it all in detail, but I'm pretty sure this'll help! This is the exact kind of info that should be stickied somewhere! Thank you once again for taking the time to write that up. All replies to this thread have been much appreciated!

Vilas, could I have a go at the CV90 textures? PM me if you'd let me. Not saying I should make them for you, I'd just be glad to try =)

But with the right permission, porting is allowed, right? Thought I've seen some STALKER stuff and it was alright. Wish I knew who to ask for permissions like that. Altough, the only models CoD could have to offer would probably be that CoD4 CH-46 sea knight that's been detailed enough to stay between all MW games. It's beautiful. If I could get permission for it I'd get help to have it in arma within the week. Currently I've been working on a soldier model using crye gen1 gear. Not having that much of a progress though. I'm so slow and much time is wasted trying to make it modular or something. So I can have some really noticeable variation in the gear.

http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/402/juggernautminesweaper.jpg You and me both know it's the actual juggernaut model from CoD-MW2. The Cypher I can't put my finger on. Looks like you got randomly gathered models. I do not believe you. Makes no difference anyway if you can use motion capture. The model is too clunky too fit with the arma character skeleton.

It's probably been taken up before, but I can't find a thread about only it. If there's no need for this thread at all and there's another one somewhere, delete this one. Now it might've been a year or two since I first saw it, but it's still something that's been wanted to be put ingame. Right now It's not ingame. I do not know why, but it seems like it is completely doable. Here's a vid showing a little of it. At 3:10. BIS could probably have a few different reasons to why some features are missing from the more commercial line of the series, like server issues, scripting problems or just it not being needed. Altough I think it's something worth working on till it's there ingame, fully functional. Most games like these (wich there are a very few of), suffer from what seems to be simple restrictions like this. This is one of the more useful features that could really make it in the game. Thoughts?

My bad. So BIS have never made something like this, only BIA? No connections between them except for the game engines being alike?

I've never played VBS, so I wouldn't know how multiplayer works, but I do know people have tried something like this with Arma and ArmAII and complained about the scripts not working so great over internet. The poll is more of a "Do you feel like it's needed or not" thing. Ofcourse BIS already knows about it, but this wont hurt anything. BIS have made it work for VBS, and if there are problems with the function, it might be worth the time to fix and implement fully.

Still. Never seen anything about it being worked on.

Where is this confirmed? I can't find anything about it being confirmed or worked on.

These video tutorials have helped me a great bit in understanding the LODs different uses, and the O2 interface. There's apparently still alot you have to do, even if you got a finished model. Now I'm just stuck trying to sort out all the different named objects from the sample files. English would've made it much easier. Then I must learn how to make config files and I'm good to go. Thank you, Gnat =)

Hi, looking for a quick answer. About the above. Is there no way to play the ACE version as the USMC on chernarus? Green netting, USMC lav HQ, etc.. Much appreciated. /edit Changed the camo variable in "version.sqf" and switched out the characters in the editor. Works now like it should now on chernarus for me.

00:50, that vid. Why would they, if they are actual humans getting shot, run around on all fours, in the mountains? (Not real people getting shot with a ".50cal".)

Yes. You get no cookies.

Here's three ones. Guess what the first one's suposed to look like :D 1920x1080

I'm fully aware of it not being confirmed. But it's not out of the question yet.

Walker, "Laaagdoll Physics" is an improvement. If the engine can't handle it somehow, I'm sure BIS wont include it. They know what they're doing. Don't you think so too? =)

He's onto something.

There's too much walls with holes in them. Almost all military bases/camps in ArmA with these kinds of walls surrounding have huge gaps everywhere.

More efficient, less immersion. Though, I don't think right now we'll be able to walk around in flying aircrafts. If I'm proven wrong, BIS takes one more step in the right direction.

Can't that already be done as it is now?

Wich picture is believed by some to be photoshopped?

Oh, I see. My bad.

You're saying Limnos is somewhere around ~240km² ?

Yeah, on page (34). I doubt it'll happen, but I know nothing.

Also. Not suggesting anything. Just showing