Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

kotov12345

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    365

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by kotov12345

  3. Posted

    check wiki link above

    Recently I found nice test based on 570 graphic card and guys uses latest intel and amd mobos and cpu.

    I know it is russian test - but easy to find section where games tested.

    You can see that same year intel systems around 20% faster than amd with same graphic card and ram.

    http://www.ixbt.com/cpu/amd-fx-8150.shtml

    To get fast gaming PC first you need to choose chipset and after that mobo.You can have cheapest CPU for it and according your budget graphic card.Ram is not make any difference 4gb or more.

  4. Posted · Edited by kotov12345

    Your mobo is 785g chipset,not fx and gx etc :)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_AMD_chipsets

    2009 mostly sell in 2010 not very new.I'd say.I really doubt if you can have more fps with current settings.

    Try to do what I ask you to do.

    Set in drivers AA and AF into app mode.

    Set Vd to 10km and set all setting in game to normal and do PP and shadows OFF.

    Take in editor SU34 and fly - what minimum and maximum fps you will get ?

  5. Posted

    since you seem to be living in london, how come you english is sooo poor...

    yes, it should

    call me 0044 208 180 76 01

    I tested many hardware due to part of my job.

    ---------- Post added at 03:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:52 PM ----------

    If I took the same hardware and changed only the motherboard to the best on the market, I probably would only see 1 or 2 FPS different.

    CPU/GPU/MEM/Hardrive, thats it for affecting fps.

    unified memory architecture, background programs running, state of HD, etc are all products of the big 4.

    Changing mobos does not significantly change anything.

    The 890FX chipset is Plenty fast. USB 3.0, 16x pci express, etc.

    all the bells and whistles.

    ok try take intel h67 chipset place cheapest intel CPU for it and see FPS.

    Set 10km VD all normal except shadows and pp and take SU34 flay over chernorus tell me what FPS you will get.

  6. Posted · Edited by kotov12345

    First of all on first look it seem that your mobo not really fast to have more fps.

    Second

    in drivers set all AA and AF to application mod.

    third in game try set all very high except AA and PP to OFF and play mp warfare on server with other people.

    Sometimes I have 25-30 fps with 1280x1024/AA normal all rest very high with faster chipset-mobo (x58 + i7 930) and similar graphic card (HD 4870X2).

    Forth if you play SP warfare your fps drop due to your pc works as server and client.

    you can change using increasing/decreasing amount of ais resistance town etc.

  11. Posted

    Read the "ModInfo" included in the download.

    There is not only a problem with TAB also with Key2 wich both can be used for something like a cheat. Its not possible to deactivate completly.

    why should I read it ? lol I feel very comfortable playing other maps :)

    warfare 070 with disable camps looks very similar and not mods needed.

    Missile range also can be limited.

    You can disable TAB and radar even without mods (like in VALHALA map)

    If you use mods you can change many other things.

  12. Posted

    Really good job but still many annoying things which looks very easy fix but still not fixed.

    Like engine on when turning turret for tanks and bmps,

    very low hit rate for aa personal launchers,

    bugs with Tunguska and m6 when they not use rockets good enough,

    broken game play when mission have attack choppers and tank same time - 1 pilot able to kill 6-10 tanks in one raid which equal 6-30 players(tab issues) and many others...

    Merry Christmas and Happy New Year everyone and I wish you will be able to fix them in 1.61.Hope it not take long time.

  14. Posted

    FIX below,

    new signature file available in .zip attached to this post

    WARNING: This is for ARMA 2 content only (ARMA 2: Free is w/o problem)

    Installation:

    1. download the file: arma2.dta.languagecore.pbo.bi.bisign.zip

    2. extract file: languagecore.pbo.bi.bisign

    3. with that overwrite file: \ARMA 2\Dta\languagecore.pbo.bi.bisign

    4. enjoy ARMA 2

    this is very important - it reason why some players will be kicked from some arma2 servers

    may be make it sticky ?

  15. Posted

    will be nice to have limitation similar to original crcti ideas with firing range.

    Current in game optical drawing distance for object approx 2km.will be nice to see limitation for locking and firing 2km as well.There is also I hope one day TAB to lock will be removed as well,except laser pointer.

  16. Posted

    I think, if AA hit the air vehicle there is no chanse to fly away, that is the reason why they made countermeasure.

    it is not questions think or not think.There are a lot of examples while aircraft was hit with aa launcher and able to land in real life.

    In game once damaged aircraft should be able to land but definitely should not be able to continue attack.We got CIT ticket for it it long story and not relayed to TAB issues.

  17. Posted · Edited by kotov12345

    > So I'd rather decrease probability of GM (guided missile) to hit moving armor to 0.1-0.2 on highest speed.I assume that can be implemented much easier.

    There is no fixed probability. It is based on rocket maneuvering capability (so if vehicle is moving probability is smaller).

    In game now if you spot GM launch means you dead.I'd say moving your tank or not moving rocket will hit you and doesn't matter how far you or how fast you drive :).Is only big hill or building will save you.

    So it is either not working correctly or need to be corrected.

    > But to make it workable you need to see cursor which is off in vet mod.

    Should all cursors in vehicles be enabled for vet?

    It depends how fix will go - to be honest I play ofp/arma/arma2 11 years and know hardware - but software is dark forest for me.

  18. Posted · Edited by kotov12345

    Possible changes for TKOH/A3

    Sad that not for arma2 but anyway.

    This is so many problems.

    All my ideas for mp game/vet mod.

    1.Countermeasures - works good and don't need to remove them.But

    From my observation in real MP match need about 4 rockets to damage aircraft - but not to destroy.It depends on map.When we play AAS maps combat aircraft was not big problem to hit with aa.But warfare maps is absolutely impossible.Sometimes needed launch about 10-15 rocket to hit once.

    So I'd rather decrease probability of GM (guided missile) to hit moving armor to 0.1-0.2 on highest speed.I assume that can be implemented much easier.

    2.Gunner in aircraft.

    Will be logical to remove TAB to Lock for ground target at all.Or if you prefer use it as command remove auto guidance for missile.

    But I'd keep it for Air targets within logical angle or green round as present now.But to make it workable you need to see cursor which is off in vet mod.

    Also will be useful and realistic to have ability move mouse over radar and lock them directly on dots.

    Friend foe recognition currently available for air targets only.

    3.Locking of not lockable ground weapons.

    Metis ,reflex,invar,tow and other laser and wire missile need be working as

    manual fire - rocket heading to cursor.

    4.Javelin and other IR lock weapons have many restrictions and will be nice to see them in game.Honestly I NEVER SAW on video if someone use them on moving targets.If you look carefully army uses them against static targets only.

    6.Smaw have maximum range 600m and if you wanna keep current as in game range please make fly not as sniper rifle bullet.Is too accurate.

    7.Lock in tanks - If you wan keep as now I'd rather restrict it with optical distance.Drawing distance for armor is 2km (someone told me is half of view distance?)- so will be logical to restrict TAB/radar abilities to 2km.Also in documents regarding gulf was said that crew in m1a1s not able to recognize friend or for over 2km.

    8.There is also idea to make reloading guided rockets longer let say 10-15 sec.May be add some support text in yellow.

    It will decrease amount of dead tanks with players.

  19. Posted · Edited by kotov12345

    also strange thing.When play on server warfare map chux I tried to use INVAR rocket t90 and rocket is not working.when I try editor - rocket follow target mark as normal - but it not make any damage to m1a1.6 rockets only damage truck - but according documents in internet 1 rocket should at least disable tank.

    But when I tried 1 rocket - 1 crew was dead, 1 at least heavy injured and 3rd run away and all parts of m1a1 was fine not even yellow.

    Logically should be opposite crew should survive better than m1a1 as it main concept of m1a1.

  23. Posted · Edited by kotov12345

    ok Pilot never able to lock anything on his own.He got target from other system.If you implement such system in game (I don't mind to TAB to LOCK from laser or similar) will be real good idea.One player detect target and input coordinates into target device and other player receive them and using them lock target.We are talking about static targets.

    But current system woks not even similar.

    Similar system for tanks.Read documents regarding problems during Gulf war 1991.Most loses m1a2 and M2A2 suffered from friendly fire.They able to detect and kill targets from 4km but identify enemy only 2km.Easiest way to implement such simulation is to ad flir view to tanks and remove TAB lock at all as well.

×