Jump to content

kotov12345

Member
  • Content Count

    365
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by kotov12345


  1. But the fact of the matter is, the T-72 blows up.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUMxZ34Ptco

    The T-90 is essentially a T-72. (Forgive the oversimplification.) I'm willing to bet that the T-90 is almost and/or as likely to explode as the T-72.

    The M1 is specially designed to NOT explode violently. (Ammo hatches blow out and the magazine is separate from the crew in the event that it does cook off.)

    it is nothing relayed to problem in game on video no t90 no rpgs no m1a2.

    What you talking about m8 ?


  2. People that over-simplify things. "Two shots from a <insert weapon name here> and <insert name of tank here> is DEAD!

    yes - but I'm only talking about game and game config.

    Game have too many simplify things now - 1 shot = full desruction

    ---------- Post added at 11:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 AM ----------

    AT-4 = M136 = ILAW

    All are in game.

    Unless you're confusing it with the Soviet AT-4 Spigot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT-4_Spigot

    ok cool m8 m136 in game is not reloadable 1 shot launcher.

    You need install arma2 b4 argue.

    Just checked setting M1A2 need 20 RPG7V and 7 RPG7VL to destroy but T90 hold only 8 is this ok ? is T90 in 2.5 times weaky ?

    I'm talking about that some vehicles too weak in game some too strong and it lead too some vehicles stayed unusable and others uses in rambo fights....


  3. vehicle name,real armor ave mm,proposal damage in game (track or turret or engine),

    complete dastroy front,side,rea for RPG7/18/M136 ,jav /metis,smaw

    all cars 1,2,2,2 1 1 1

    BTR60 7 1,3,3,2 1 2

    STRIKER 7 1,3,3,2 1 2

    M2A2 M2A3 M6 10 1,3,3,2 1 2

    LAV25 10 1,3,3,2 1 2

    SHILKA 12 1,3,3,2 1 2

    BTR40 12 1,3,3,2 1 2

    M113 25 1,4,3,2 1 2

    BMP2 33 1,4,3,2 1 2

    BMP3 35 1,4,3,2 1 2

    T34 45 1,4,3,2 1 2

    AAVP77A1 45 1,4,3,2 1 2

    BTR90 120 1,5,3,2 1 3

    T55 120 1,5,3,2 1 3

    VODNIK 120 1,5,3,2 1 3

    T72 150 1,6,4,3 2 3

    T90 high 2,7,4,3 2 4

    M1A1 high 2,8,4,3 2 4

    m1a2 high 2,9,4,3 2 5

    If this table bit complicated - for example:

    T72 armor 150mm average and will be nice to see in game that basic RPG or M136 make simply damage to part which was hit (dead track or gun or engine or other) and completely destroy needed 6 such rpgs from front 4 from side or 3 from rear or 2 javelins or 3 smaw rockets.

    Armor taken from Google and checked in different web sites.High mean cant find proper digits.


  4. I got a i5-2500k which is faster then your CPU.

    you cant compare I7 930 and i5 2500k because they cant be installed in same mobo.

    930 for 55 chipset - i5 2500k for 67.

    67 chipset will be faster than 55 no doubt - but

    difference in games between 2100 2300 etc any sandy bridge will be less than 5 %

    so if you got 100 fps - if you will buy fester cpu you will get 105 FPS which will be absolutely useless because you cant see the difference visually 100 and 105 fps and will be waste of money :)

    and reading test I'm not found any difference in games between 55 and 67 chipsets.

    In other words I put my graphic (4870x2) inside your pc you will get same fps as me :) or not more than 5-10% more which is not be visible.


  5. But kotov it is still wrong what you are saying.

    lol you don't know hat are you talking about m8.

    Ghost from HOTSHOT overclock his cpu to 5 or 6ghz and not got any fps more in arma2 - I asked.

    I currently use I7 930 and 100% sure if I overlock it I'm not will get any more fps at all.

    Read more tests and reviews about effect different computer parts in 3d gaming.


  6. Overclocking CPU not give any effect in arma2

    I had Pentium D 940 and clocked it from 3.4 to 4.2ghz - not single more FPS.

    Changed Graphic card from 7900GTX to 4870X2 got 250% speed (from 10 to 25 fps)

    If you have limited cash buy ram + graphic - more cash - buy mobo - more cpu.

    for last 5 years I changed

    like 5 different cpus and 5 different graphic cards and 2 chipsets.


  7. Desert Storm illustrated neatly that the soviet era T72 could not touch a standard Abrams and in fact the majority of tanks lost by the US were from friendly fire.

    is this really looks like war forum or game forum?

    on my web page says:

    Bohemia Interactive Forums > BI MILITARY GAMES FORUMS > ARMA 2 & Operation Arrowhead > ArmA 2 & OA - SUGGESTIONS

    ARMA2 & AO SUGGESTIONS! :)

    again who cant read it :

    ARMA2 AND AO SUGGESTIONS :)

    for who not understand what I'm talking about.

    I'm talking about broken game play.

    watch:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9YXHz1G_gE

    and next video will be soon.


  8. you all right but really small problem:

    game not even close to realism and my idea only to make game better.

    It is not about politics or whose tanks better.

    It is request to give all tanks in game abit longer life.

    Even choppers in game hold 2 sabots shots

    Kju rejected ticket - so actually this is not actual anymore. c u

    PS Really fun when someone have washed brains.M1A2 can be out of battle with 1 RPG shot.Check documents.

×