Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

recon 7185

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    31

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by recon 7185

  1. Posted

    My average fps dropped from the 260 series drivers (sorry do not remember which one) in the OA benchmark from 81 to 69 with these latest drivers. Not a big deal because gameplay does feel smooth even in cpu limited sp missions. My 3dmark vantage score is still within parameters for my hardware, so im sure its not a bad driver install. As far as the Atoc issue, i do not notice any of that

  2. Posted · Edited by recon 7185

    tested a2:co for the first time yesterday with ht on, and it just utilised 2 of the cores, instead of 4, as it does without ht.

    might have been something with my setup, but think that is wierd.

    I find it that it runs a bit smoother without ht

    Are you serious? Well if i am only using 2 cores that might be my problem. . .

    I got rid of my AMD system due to bad performance in this game, pretty much had it for a week and returned all the parts and built an i7 system. As for your graphics seems fine if thats your fps. The reason mine is at 83 is because I have all the eye candy turned on haha. Drops like that in fps happen due to AI and other things (maybe poor optimization in some levels) it sounds like. I dont tweak my .exe file like others though so that might be an issue for me. My vantage score is 39000

  5. Posted

    Ok so i took some previous advice and actually ran around in zargabad without much ai through a multiplayer map (i could not find a single player) and ranged from 47fps to 80+ in the city. So i take it I am fine? . . . andi think the AI is to blame as well as optimization for the mission i am on (running off of a OCZ vertex SSD now), and not texture loading or things like that (but did improve a little with SSD). TO SEVENZ - I have HT enabled, is it suposed to increase performance? The other two things I am not familiar with sorry, but if you could let me know I would appreciate it. TO GEORGE- if benchmarks are good with the game and 3dmark11 i think you are good. The issue may lie in driver support or the game itself

  10. Posted

    Other games run great on my comp and my vantage scores for gpu and cpu are right where they are supposed to be (evga forums have a post for vantage scores with a lot og scores listed). Other maps are great for me in arma, but zargabad must not like an ingame setting or something else

  11. Posted

    i've done that bench with a i7 2600k @ 4.1 ghz and a gtx 580 @ stock and i've got 52 fps with your settings except my resolution at 1900*1200.

    You're performance seems normal.

    You could try with a single card though just to make sure :D

    I'm sure it will drop to where you would expect it to, sli is not that great in arma. I got it for other reasons and its just a perk that I can use it in arma. The performance in zargabad is just lower than I thought it would be, although from reading the forums I knew it would be. Just not sure what to blame

  13. Posted · Edited by recon 7185

    Krixxus, thanks for he detailed reply. I only hit low framerates at the begining of the mission 8 (zargabad) when the air support is rolling through. My frames go to 32 frames to 80 something after i get into the middle of the mission, also depending where i am at. I also defrag like crazy, but I just got a WD 1tb caviar black that always comes back as 1% fragmented after installing arma. I am not sure if it is arma, because it was the first game i installed and still have more to go. But the 1% bugs me, but it may not be a big deal. I did E08 and got 81 fps, and that is will 1920x1080, viewdistance at 2400, HDR on High, Post processing on High, video memory at default, and all other settings (including AA and anistropic filtering) on very high.

  16. Posted

    So is the consensus that my hard drive is causing my low fps? Those with regular hard drives what do you average in a mission like #8? I am starting to think that I at least need a hdd with 64mb cache because I can't afford a ssd. Also when I get 33 fps it is in the middle of town fighting with ai, not just running around in multiplayer

  17. Posted

    Ye I am confused because my cpu is overclocked to 4.15ghz, but is my 7200rpm hard drive my bottleneck? The mission I am on is 8 by the way. My system scores 39000 in 3dmark vantage so not sure why some of you guys are doing much better

  18. Posted · Edited by recon 7185

    Well that's a big difference. Is that at the start of missions? I notice my framerates improve as ai players get killed off. What do you get in the benchmarks? Also what settings do you use ingame and did you overclock your i7?

  19. Posted

    What kind of framerates are you getting in zargabad? I average about 33 with everything but post processing on very high (including AA) with an i7 930 at 4.15 ghz and two gtx 480's. Some maps i get 100+ but i need a referance point to know if I am getting normal performance. Thanks

  21. Posted

    Thanks. I am at work right now but I know i am around more buildings and units so I may be. I have a pretty decent system (i7 930 oc'd to 4.15ghz and 2 gtx 480's) and usually see very good performance in most missions with everything on very high. So i just want to make sure I dont have a bad install or something

×