Jelliz

This can actually be tweaked by the mission makers, but it is often overseen. unit setskill ["Aimingaccuracy",0.15] makes the bullets go all over the place, unit setskill ["Aimingaccuracy",1] makes them hit on (almost) every shot. For such an open environment it simply "pwns" all games. Yet, there are games that gives you the "illusion" that they have good AI, but if you put 100 of those AI's on the map, the performance loss would be even greater than in Arma 2.

Current system is good, it forces teamplay upon the would-be lonewolframbo's, and a fatigue system implemented would affect the AI in currently produced content(BIS missions, campaigns and user made missions) From the Arrowhead FAQ:

Absolutely true, so actually a modified combat mode which lets the group move faster and is less likely to stop and fire is more required for use when under heavy fire and/or retreating.

Either you have some serious issues with the game, or you are just trolling. Simple enough, enable subtitles in the options menu... Ok, trolling it is then...

52 views and no answer means that those 52 people might not have had the answer... But AFAIK the backpack works like an ammobox, so you cant have an ammobox within an ammobox. Same goes for having an ammobox in a vehicles cargo. Static weapons can not be added to a vehicles cargo, but it is possible to fake it via scripts (Addaction and the like). EDIT: Kylania was faster :p

That isnt a function BIS designed, it is something that the mission designer made. (Was this on Domination? Even more obvious, a public server?) Besides that, it would be cool if BIS could code this into the vanilla game.(With reasonable functionality, Blackhawks cant lift M1A2's for example)

setwind [200,0,true]; ??? U crazy dude. Try flying a chopper in those winds:shine:

IMHO Swat 3 was better than Swat4, there was tons of quality mods, PVP was 10 times better and Coop was awesome when playing in clans.

One of the campaign missions should be coop available. "Heat" it is called. One of the reasons the campaign isnt coop compatible is because it is alot of extra work to make it work, And the second one(guessing) is that the campaign is made so that if you lose a team member, he wont be replaced for the rest of the campaign.

Operation Arrowhead was a standalone expansion(EDIT: standalone expansion = a new game in itself), so they made no obligation to upgrade the old content with FLIR and the like. So in other words, there is nothing wrong with the old content that needs to be "fixed". The money you paid for the BAF dlc was for the BAF content, what on earth makes you think you paid for upgraded USMC and Russia????

Boot camp mission "Team Command" should help you.

The also has it:rolleyes:

We need some more OPFOR. But preferably something from the Armaverse, like if Ardistan(North of Takistan) suddenly goes mental and invades Takistan to eliminate the BLUFOR. But of course Ardistan would need good tech. Imagine if both sides were using IR-lasers on their weapons and how chaotic that would look

Like with Arma 2 that should probably(If all is well) happen 6-7 months after release. (Like with the 1.5 patch.)

Latest beta before BAF release was 2 days ago, and in that time they received crashdumps from people having issues and (possibly) managed to fix them, before release. As i see it, it must have been quite hectic readying for release of both the patch and DLC. So if 2-3 bugs(even small or large) appears in that small timeframe between beta and release, i dont see how they could have done a complete test before release. They could have delayed it, but imagine the shitstorm this forum would be in if they did that..

Which version are you on? I'm on Eliteness 2.78 / Depbo 3.14 and i get the "DePbo unknown header type" error message.

Must be something with the FSM's or anything conflicting with it, would love to find the error but i havent been able to dePbo the contents yet..

DLC = DownLoadable Content Who put that spam in your jams? The internet isnt banned in the Czech Republic...

Good idea, maybe the cursor could be the torch centre and it will light up around it in a radius.

SprocketIDEA will host it aswell. If DLC sales is a success and BIS is in the mood for it, they could potentially release some DLC's on a DVD, like with those "Game of the year edition" thingys. But of course, there would have to be a large enough demand for it. And looking at the poll in this thread, i personally would be all like "DLC 4evarz, gimme ur moneys over teh netz!!11!!1!!". But Indie developers works in mysterious ways, you just never know..

Having looked over game files and getting a overview of what would have to be done to bring A2 content to OA standards, it is a huuuge job even for a team. And the features of OA were not planned while developing A2, so why not get paid for the hard work of upgrading the old content to new standards? BIS does run on money afterall, not a spoiled community.

BIS has said that they wish to expand on the Armaverse even more, and if DLC sales proves to be a success, which i personally hope, there might be more. More discussion on the pro's and con's of DLC should be here. This is for discussions on the BAF DLC, and not DLC's in general.

AFAIK wouldnt much have to be rewritten and such to allow for a non exploitable ranking system within the game? As of now(with the proposed ranking system) i could just make myself a mission where i score gazillions of points by killing rabbits, host it just for myself and become the top l33t über ninja of the Arma2 multiplayer scene. But anyways, my opinion is that the Arma series is just not "that kind of game"...

Previous page dude..