Jump to content

101_Proof

Member
  • Content Count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by 101_Proof


  1. 9500GT is not what I would consider "decent" for 1680 x 1050 res.

    With a Q6600 @ 3.3 and a 9800GTX+ I was able to get decent frames with low/medium settings.

    I found nice increases from 2.8 - 3.4 (3.4 just a tad 2 hot for my taste)

    Upgraded to a gtx925 and exe rename and I now can run 1920 x 1200 with most on high and 4K view distance and 125% fillrate.

    There are some missions that are very fps heavy, second on in town for example, but the rest run very smooth.

    Tried different drivers etc ?

    CLosed down all unneeded background apps / tasks ?

    what 3dm 06 are you getting with current setup, I used both 3dmark and Arma2 Benchmark after each change and could see the results improving in both.

    So having a system that's well above the minimum requirements only allows me to run the game at minimum settings? I dont get it. I was hoping to get some tips on what I could do for my current system to optimize the game because I cant afford any upgrades right now. Thanks.


  2. I'm not understanding why I only get 10-20fps max with my video settings set anything above VERY LOW. I have a descent system that shouldnt be having these problems, I'm well above the minimum settings. Here's my specs....

    Q6600 @ 2.4 Ghz

    Nvidia 9500 GT

    3GB Memory

    22" LG LCD with 1680X1050 max res and 75Hz max refresh

    Set at 1680X1050 and 'quality' set to low I get crappy terrain/object detail with everything blurry unless I zoom in and about 15-20fps. Just not understanding what the problem is here. If someone could help me out I'd be SUPER appreciative! thanks!

×