Jump to content

Ish

Member
  • Content Count

    304
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by Ish


  1. Just a loader? I was the carrier for that bloody thing. wont set eyes on one ever again. :D

    I had a choice. I choose loader. I just fell in love with the pressure i guess :p

    While I agree the launcher itself is more cumbersome to haul around, especially in dense forests (all of Sweden) the ammunition weighed more ;) / :(

    Swe version looks a bit differnt, mostly the "tripod"

    Fil:Carl_Gustaf._recoilless.rifle.jpg


  2. Yes but you have a 5870 according to your sig. Our 4xxx series cards would go up in flames with those settings ;)

    Well I guess I'm exaggerating. It's only AA that really brings the performance down for me.

    It's the same for me really. Only my system can manage it. I don't exactly get a stable 45fps with it set too high, but it's playable. Plus my old comp, i ran the game at 15-25 FPS so it would be stupid too complain :p


  3. I get really good performance with all on very high (where available) and high AA @ 1920x1200 (16:10 24") 100% FillR and no PP.

    Settings in CC are as follows.

    Smoothvision HD: AA = Use app/box filter

    Smoothvision HD: AF = Use app

    Catalyst A.I = Advanced (the higher value, the more it relies on th CPU, mine is 4Ghz so no reason not to use it for me, but it might not be appropriate for everyone)

    Mipmap = High Quality

    V-Sync = Always ON

    AA Mode = Multi right now, but i reckon Adaptive is as good if not better.

    Tripple buffer = Unchecked.. But it doesn't matter since its OGL anyway :)


  4. I don't know all the specifics about my new rig coming in the mail (since it's a Christmas present), but I do know this much.

    A 2.8 GHz dual core processor

    3-4 gigs of DDR2 ram

    ATI Radeon HD4850

    Windows 7 OS

    So will a rig like that be able to play Arma2 on a 1280X1040 monitor with at least 30 FPS on decent high settings?

    Definatly, I've run A2 on a much worse computer with better fps.


  5. I run the game with everything at highest @1920x1200, except I use 100% fillrate, and no Post Processing. The only thing that really messes with my FPS is AA and fillrate, but I can't stand edges etc, so AA was left on..

    My tips (for ATI).

    This is not to maximize FPS, but to make it look good, but still run good as well.

    Turn your Mipmap to highest quality, and everything else to lowest, and put box as filter for the AA.

    Max everything except PP and fillrate (3D res).

    Gradually reduce AA until acceptable, if at all needed.


  6. Well that the reason to own a 5870, its to use AA...or run it at 200% I cant stand jaggies or crawlling... which can happen even at 200% but it gone at 4X(normal) AA, Get another 5870 and then you will see the big differences for GPUs But a 4.0+ i7 will show alot of performance in this game, and it will push the GPU(s) all that much better.

    Using two 4870x2s @ 4XAA all the time. 4870X2=5870 basically~

    Well unfortunately ATI AA is shit. I think it's more ATI related than AA in general, because everything else i can set to very high and still get 60 fps.

    I can run with high AA, but it doesn't feel as smooth.. And you can forget it during large scale op's.. :rolleyes:

    <edit> You can't honestly believe that I can run 1920x1200@200% ? Man last time i tried it loaded the textures for 5 mines, then i got bored and closed the game via task manager. 150% is doable, but still pretty useless as i'll still have the edges. Also.. It's the flickering of textures that i want gone.


  7. Best to put ARMA2 on its own fast HD or at least its own partition.

    Get 24Gb RAM and put the entire game on a RAM drive, should solve that problem :rolleyes:

    My only real advice is too turn of the AA.. Everything else I can run on very high no problem, but the AA eats the FPS. And I have a proper gaming computer that is like 3 months old.

    I doubt sporting a faster harddrive is gonna help the AA performance.

×