Darkhorse 1-6

Should be fairly simple, could probably be done with a script, using the "Artillery Radar" model that's used in Warfare. If it CAN be easily done, it should be in the next patch.

Over the dead bodies of my entire Royal Sahrani Marine Divison. :p :cool: It will be pretty good tho. I need to mooch the latest version of the F-111 off Crash soon. (I gave my life a couple months back, slamming my 'Vark into the ground in order to test the wreck texture/model. ) ;)

Someone has already made/is making the ANA. Use the search function next time Konrad1. ;)

Good luck with that JDog. I have a feeling my Nvidia 7800 (Yes, I know it's old, stop staring) is going to die in the next 6 months, if not sooner.

Nah, what it is is a village on the flat part of the map, with huge gigantic mountains nearby. Atleast from the picture it is...

Expect some more screenshots in the next couple days, and possibly more, soon...

20/13 hours on the original Operation Flashpoint perhaps? (hey, a 13 day week makes as much sense as the OP, so leave me alone!) If the answer is no, than try this. Hibernation! In the snow! That's why these letters are white! spamspamspamantispamspamspam.

No, you don't get it. What you suggested would put almost all of ArmA IIs content into OA. Meaning people wouldn't have to spend $50 on ArmA II, they could just spend $10 on a DLC. That's why it won't happen. Maybe a patch to bring some vehicles up to OAs level, but a DLC containing all of ArmA IIs content is a bad plan, not to mention a stupid one.

That is just amazing. Especially the flat village with the mountain. How high is that? :eek:

Says the now obvious Canadian (Or is it "Canuckistani"?) :p

If that happens, it would need to be a $40 DLC considering it would bring the entirety of OA's content to ArmA II. :j:

XFire, Steam, Teamspeak, Mumble, Ventrilo, Gamespy, etc. etc. etc. Now remove any references to me, including the quote, from your post (#47) before a Moderator has to do it. I did not "raise issues". I was stating the facts to the OP, who is an extremely ignorant person.

Ok, please do not use me to try and further your goals. I am against the OP. We don't need it, we have 3rd party programs that can do what is needed. Maybe an in-game buddy list could be good, but we do not need a server browser that functions like CoH. Please edit your post, I do not wish to see my words twisted to accommodate your aim.

No, you were infected 4 years ago, it's just the virus you have has had such a long period of quietness that it has become sentient, and decided not to fuck with your computer anymore. Instead, it has decided to infect NORAD and the Pentagon, and wipe out the 16 year old kid in Russia who created it. :p

Ok, you need to learn some very important things: 1) - BIS HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE SERVERS 2) - BIS does not use bandwidth, BIS provides the game, not servers or bandwidth. 3) - BIS will not create an online server for each mission, because they don't control the servers, and there are hundreds if not thousands of missions. 4) - All of the servers you see are run by different people. A bunch of them are locally run servers created for somebody to test their mission, or for them to play with their friends. Another (the biggest) bunch is run by clans, groups, realism units etc. for their members to play on, they allow public public players like you to play on them so people can learn how THEY play the game. Being able to join any server you want is not a right. 5) - People understand that if they join servers with other people they will be "more full". But what you don't understand is that maybe that person doesn't want to join that server. Maybe he has issues with that server, or maybe he just wants to play a small mission without having to worry about convincing everybody on the big server to vote for it. This game is NOT CoD. This game is NOT CoH. This game is NOT Battlefield. This is the grandchild of the original Operation Flashpoint. GET USED TO IT!

write a script then. Mudkip is actually right for once.:j:

Actually, it wouldn't be benefiting ANZAC or FDF. ANZAC already uses Franze's amazing model, as is Project RACS. FDF currently has one of the best aircraft models in the community, atleast with what I've seen of their F-18 cockpit, and imho community made stuff is often more accurate and better looking than official content.

NWU: http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=10261

You also wish you were cool enough to sing song, but we can't all do that can we? ;)

I could have sworn the Russians came in at the end. Crap. The heat is getting to me. :butbut:

He never said that the Vanilla BF2 system is more realistic. You should read things more carefully. ;)

He will release it when it's done/he has the bandwidth.

Then these are the wrong forums for you. Try this forum instead. :)

He might mean the big SETI dish, which would make no sense, as it's used to listen to outer space, not find aircraft.

Well, The F-35 is being tested, but the ArmAverse is set 5 or so years down the road IIRC, not to mention they rearranged the setup of the actual world landmass, so the ArmAverse should be looked at as an alternate reality, as in it appears the same, but the more you look the bigger the differences are. I am one of these people, but you must understand that until we get a game that is actually set in the 80s-90s we will not have equipment from that era, considering it's sometime between 2010 and 2020 in the ArmAverse.