nodunit

Oooh okay I see what you mean now, though I think using the optic as part of the geometry would be a bad idea since the size in high zoom would be ridiculously big, enough to pretty much block your view almost entirerly. @ bravo6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s06NFgH6qw 2:13-2:20

I don't see how that would be a good idea with the tank, remember todays systems are mostly digital so it's unlikely the reticle and other various information displayed would change size regardless of zoom.

:confused_o: Isn't it a bit early to call it an "ultra realistic" military sim at this point? We haven't really seen anything thus far especiallly vehicle dynamics. Sure we saw the GC video's but that doesn't tell us truth. We have however seen that the screen displays so many things it kills the realism effect IE what position you are in etc. Not sure I buy 'his' reason as to why the 2 was dropped, as for the marketing (from clive himself if he's the guy in the video's) I don't buy the naming because if that were the case he would call it Dragon Rising in interviews, NOT Operation Flashpoint. The message I get every time I hear that is "Hey lets build upon the original's success yet at the same pretend it doesn't quite exist/ we made it." Besides he obviously doesn't understand that the majority of the gamer base (or does and is using that to the benefit) doesn't give two rats of an ass to research actual developers, they simply go by the name...I think I'm done here, semi tired and I think I'v lost my clearity..though on a side note yes Star wars was classified by episodes but numbers alone sounded rather dull. (Proof shown at the scrolling intro text). :dd:

It's quite nice to see it and the new emoticons though I'm honestly surprised some of them are allowed use.

Thanks for that, though I think I'll just keep this new name, the only difference was my old one has an X at the front and back, so if anyone wants to PM me the name is pretty much the same :computer: EDIT: I wouldn't say the Harrier was sloppy so much as the earliest in getting familiar with the enhanced tools and high poly models. The Harrier was afterall one of the very first units shown in Arma (and perspective can be a major P.I.T.A) though I do find myself curious at what masterpiece BIS could make after their A-10, that thing was just gorgeous all around.

Yus I agree the quality of Arma2's vehicles is excellent especially the tires on the MTVR. Comparing the BRDM-2 to the Vodnik you can really see just how much they learned through the process and I was surprised to see the bushmaster on their LAV actually have the indentions like the real cannon. Also yay had to re-register because my old sign in for some reason didn't work..ah just as well, I had that warning block for several years (I blame you Franze.)