churnedfortaste

You're probably correct, I really hope so too...

I've just realised, the setting for ArmA 2 is far too picturesque and similar to Sahrani, why can't we just get Iraq and disregard political correctness...

I've just realised, the setting for ArmA 2 is far too picturesque and similar to Sahrani, why can't we just get Iraq and disregard political correctness...

I really hope this has an in depth story line, I would wait another 4 years if they could completely reinvent this, not just make it into another heartless so-called 'simulator'... Do me proud BIS

I really hope this has an in depth story line, I would wait another 4 years if they could completely reinvent this, not just make it into another heartless so-called 'simulator'... Do me proud BIS

There's no way they would be announcing ArmA 2 if they weren't confident that it was going to be great, which it could very well be, maybe team 2 working on ArmA 2 is light years better than team 1 working on the first one? Ooh, I really hope they make it a hardcore realism game, realistic firefights and AI, realistic voice acting e.t.c Personally, I have no reason to be outraged or overjoyed by this, as I haven't seen enough of Arma 2 to come to a conclusion about it...

There's no way they would be announcing ArmA 2 if they weren't confident that it was going to be great, which it could very well be, maybe team 2 working on ArmA 2 is light years better than team 1 working on the first one? Ooh, I really hope they make it a hardcore realism game, realistic firefights and AI, realistic voice acting e.t.c Personally, I have no reason to be outraged or overjoyed by this, as I haven't seen enough of Arma 2 to come to a conclusion about it...

Maybe they have been working harder on ArmA 2 all along, and ArmA 1 was there in order to fund it?

Maybe they have been working harder on ArmA 2 all along, and ArmA 1 was there in order to fund it?

I really don't understand this, it looks just like ArmA to me, shouldn't it be an advancement on it's predecessor? Maybe they're just doing it to rage fanboys, you know, for the lulz...

I really don't understand this, it looks just like ArmA to me, shouldn't it be an advancement on it's predecessor? Maybe they're just doing it to rage fanboys, you know, for the lulz...

TP her house then set fire to it kk

The aiming drag and recoil are too sluggish on the m24, also the stupid tracer and the added zoom make it feel as if you are shooting a slow moving round...

Well, it is a game and no one is actually dying...

Fingers crossed this is a new tactical shooter game...

Yes, I was taking the piss out of the guy who can't spell

I also think you should get rid of the 'berrys', make them be half casual, half camoflauged with ammo belts e.t.c, make sure they all have scruffy hair like you always see SAS having...

It would seem slower to me because of how it sucks up your resources and FPS, but I really don't see too much difference in the speed of things compared...

Strange, I just paused the original NIN version of the song to watch that video Awesome idea though, the video using real rounds made it look as if live rounds were going through the screen and further into the virtual world

I don't think you should have made this poll, We get 48% common sense and 52% people who primarily associate PB with BF2 :/

I'm not sure what others views on it are, but I would rather wait to have it come in a bigger + more polished package than have it released early, would make it feel more 'christmassy', if you know what I mean

http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_159222541.html That's crazy, but it might work... Will we see this in GAME 2 perhaps?

More vehicles and weapons, the choice of the two at the moment is quite small for proper armies really

It would be rather inhumane if it was a permanent effect, what with it being against the enemy soldier's will, but it makes you think what technology in the future will allow for non-violent warfare that isn't just intelligence-based...

I'd love to see America and U.K. vs China and Russia