Zipper5

Sure: Nah, it ain't personal. You're just another idiot on the internet with a free IP changer who just couldn't handle his first ban. We'll keep banning you even if we have to ban all of Greece. :rolleyes: And yes, them P8H8 guys really gave me a run for my money! :eek:

Welcome to the forums! This is the section for ARMA 3. There is an ARMA section. Please be more careful where you post next time and use the search function as this is a common problem. Apply the latest patch for ARMA which you can find here. This problem will go away once you do. Moving to the correct forum.

Various crash Exception Codes with this beta that seem to depend on what -malloc setting I'm using: No -malloc parameter: -malloc=0: -malloc=1: -malloc=2: And all point to my graphics card drivers still. Crash dumps are on the way to Dwarden.

_unit = _this select 0; _build = nearestBuilding _unit; _unit doMove (_build buildingPos 0); Did you figure they just did it by magic in UPSMon?

If Domination is coming back, Xeno will say so. Thread locked.

He's also no longer CEO of Microsoft.

What version of Arma 2 comes in a zip? :confused: I smell something fishy...

Who says they aren't? Just because it isn't here immediately doesn't mean a fix isn't being worked on. Second time I've had to post this in 2 days but a couple people do not make up this entire community. Before this quoted post you weren't being flamed either. Racism is not accepted here. Either start acting like a decent human being or GTFO. You have been warned. Now, back on topic please.

Other war-themed games other than the ARMA series? What is this madness? In all seriousness the only other particularly-war-themed games I play other than the ARMA series are Call of Duty 4 and Call of Duty: World at War and I play them very rarely.

It just perpetuates these silly and sometimes outlandish arguments. As I said, I'm giving it a chance to prove me wrong. Anyways, if we're looking at futuristic stuff here, then lets look the other way too - historical accuracy: Does that look like any T-80 you've ever seen?

Oh God, a whole thread devoted to this crap... I'll give it a chance but there is a very short leash involved here.

It is extremely unlikely this will ever be changed. OFP is 10 years old. Also, please search before posting. News discussion is not for threads like these. Thread locked.

If you wish for the helicopter to be immediately at your preferred height, use something like the following: _alt = x; heli setPos [(position heli select 0),(position heli select 1),_alt]; heli flyInHeight _alt; And, obviously, replace x with your height value and heli with the name you've given to your helicopter. If you wish for the helicopter to descend to your preferred altitude, use: _alt = x; heli flyInHeight x; Keep in mind that flyInHeight only activates when an aircraft has a waypoint assigned to it. Hope that helps!

8TLD3Z6sJWA

Ah, what I meant was I do not believe it was introduced solely by the use of the Take On Community Preview.

OMAC - I've been getting ACCESS_VIOLATION crashes launching, exiting and within A2CO with these new betas. You aren't the only one. I don't believe it has anything to do with the Take On Community Preview, as I was getting them before I ever installed it.

Anonymous is the first thing that pops into your head when you see V? :D Well, mission accomplished for them I guess.

Sure, no one should be allowed to question their government. Pretty soon you'll end up with a few of these in China:

A few people do not make up the entire community. Do not turn this into a shit-throwing argument. Sort this out yourselves, involving us or not, or let it be. Do not air it out in public, and please remove that PM or I will remove it myself.

"Chinese democracy." Right.

Few things I see here: 1. We do not permit the publishing of private messages without the consent of all parties involved. I find it highly unlikely ANZAC Steve gave you permission to publish said PM. Instead, you should have simply asked people to do what you have requested and that is all. Report it to us if you feel it should be. If he has given you permission to post it then keep it, otherwise remove it please. 2. You guys should stop using the same base models across all of your F-16 packs. You are causing way too much trouble and it's getting annoying for us to have to clean up after you.

-malloc=0 <- No difference, crashes after short period of time -malloc=1 <- Lasted for longer than 0 but still crashed, didn't notice any difference in performance -malloc=2 <- Seemed to last longer than 0 and 1 but still crashed, didn't notice performance changes -malloc=3 <- Seemed equal to 0 -malloc=4 <- Crashes before it even gets to the main menu All of these were tested using the same mission. However, to repro I think all you would need to do is stick a few AI patrolling Berezino, along with yourself, and just wait. My specs, again: Windows 7 Ultimate 32bit Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz nVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 1GB 2GB DDR2 RAM @ 800MHz Freshly defragged with Defraggler, cleaned with CCleaner, newest drivers installed. All crashes report an ACCESS_VIOLATION and point towards my graphics card drivers. I have good crash dumps for -malloc=2 and -malloc=4. These crashes do not occur in 1.59.79600.

Just ran a test with -malloc=0 running a Fraps benchmark recording in the background. It resulted in the same ACCESS_VIOLATION crash as before. Benchmark results: I presume the min FPS of 8 was due to the crash. Will now try with -malloc=1 through -malloc=4. Specs: Windows 7 Ultimate 32bit Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz nVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 1GB 2GB DDR2 RAM @ 800MHz

People with nVIDIA cards are getting these same ACCESS_VIOLATION crashes in the newer betas of Arma 2. I get them so often that I'd rather go back to the earlier betas. I guess Take On has had the same changes recently which causes these errors.

Those are all early pictures of OFP.