ziiip

Lol, well said man. :D Some people are never satisfied... Personally I can't wait to jump at the game. Edit: The new german pix are great. :D:D

Lol so much debate over a stupid missile launcher. It's like a mote in the universe.

The publisher has the final call for the release date.

Both the pictures and the videos are taken @ normal settigns. ;) The reviewer guy himself said that.

The PC Dome reviewer guy said it on his website that the vids he recorded are taken at NORMAL graphics settigns,

It feels like Tiscali wanted to screw up the interest of BIS...this IGN preview is awesome, and remember the US IGN review wasnt too gentle to ArmA1.

Join a multiplayer match straight away.

Woah, the game looks SO DAMN GOOD.:D:D:D Tiscali mush have f**ked up somethong real bad at settigns. The shots from that german preview are like :eek::eek:

That stuff is as obsolete as my grandma. No offence though. ;)

Is that rating going to prevent anyone from getting the game? Ofc there are some crazy parents but I hardly doubt that killing as a soldier puts off many parents. "but ultimately 16+/18+... it makes not the slightest bit of difference. " - exactly :)

That release date looks pretty reasonable to me. :) The beta testing is already in progress and the stuff should be shipped to the stores about a month after going gold. :D

What does "fine" mean to you?:)

Oh noes..:eek:

Copy protections systems that need weeks to crack are kinda effective AFAIK. I wouldn't want to wait 3 freakin' weeks to get a highly anticipated and already released game. I guess a lotta ppl think the same way.

Part 3? :D

I wonder why a developer is answering to BIS' press release when a PR guy should reply. That AI programmer guy said that one right.

You are one of the lucky people then. :D

Wow it's a really cool new feature that the AI can surrender now. :D I guess squads without AT won't be foolin around tanks no more waiting to be shot.

Oh yeah, when ppl were bitching ArmA, you were all saying "Games arent all just about graphix, its the GAMEPLAY that matters". I've kinda read that type of comment a million times. Now it's OFP2 that is visually inferior(tho I think its pretty decent) and you guys are jumping at it saying "yea that OFP 2 totally sux lol like the graphix are n00b". It's the gameplay guys. I sense...ahem, hypocrisy? Don't get me wrong ArmA2 enjoys my priority but OFP2 sure is gonna be fun too.

So ArmA2 is particularly coded for dual- and quad-core CPUs, but what about the triple-core phenoms? Are those any better than the dual-core babys from performance perspective?

And what is your experience with it? Is it really that much better?

Nope, no dumb downs, Marek said that personally. Also, PS3 supports mods and mouse/keyboard too. I dunno if all games support the peripherials but UT3 does for sure so it might as well work in other games.

By far the best video so far.

Well, the two consoles handle GTA IV all right which is also vast and crammed with building, i guess ArmA2 will run ok. Though the framerate dropped a lot pretty often, but it was playable.

Why wouldn't ArmA2 come to 360s? Because a few whiny nerds think that consoles suck? It's pretty awful some ignorant ppl can jump at each other for having a different kind of entertainment hardware lol. If a game is multiplatform, console sales usually and dominantly outperform the PC sales. Marek stated that the game is coming for consoles, the official site says that too, you could see 360 interface buttons...it's obvious.