Winters

my point is lost. so nevermind.

Iraqi civilian bodycount caused by Saddam through the years = Thousands upon Thousands.

LOL, well, i am in New York City avon

all of the above J/K Lag and High Pingers are the worst. i am guessing they are the ones who voted for "custom sounds"

Special Forces rescue POW while marines feint attack on city. 19 Year Old Jessica Lynch was rescued from her captors more here: POW Rescue

can you imagine how crappy it would look on a Gameboy?

has anyone played it yet? or maybe you have it but had not played it yet? or maybe you plan on playing it in the near future? or heard of someone who has played it? anyway, let me know what you think. Constuctive Feedback is the key here people, i dont need anyone saying "it sucked dood" tell me why it sucked if you think that way  WARNING: THIS IS NOT A WALK IN THE PARK, DO NOT DOWNLOAD THIS MISSION IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR AN EASILY BEATABLE MISSION, IT WILL TAKE SUPERIOR TACTICS TO WIN BUT IT CAN BE DONE.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (BergHoff @ Mar. 29 2003,16:55)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I hate the Password hehe PLEASE GIVE A SMALL HINT~!!!!! <span id='postcolor'> You just gave yourself a hint. EVERYONE hates to see the password.

I may buy it just so i can give my other 3 discs to someone less fortunate than me.

Hill 420!!!!! get it here: Hill 420 It uses Seb Nam Pack 2.0 & Jungle Everon

is it a Vietnam mission?

I love how GWB says NK is a problem for that area of the world to deal with. If thats so then what the hell is Iraq? and will you PLEASE stop trying to tie Saddam to 9/11 in order to drum up support for the war. Is it 2004 yet?

They don't trust the US and after GWB Sr. abandoned them in '91 after his big "rise up against saddam" speech i would have a hard time trusting them as well.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bn880 @ Mar. 28 2003,20:27)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Mar. 28 2003,14:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Winters @ Mar. 28 2003,20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">That you support the troops. It has no political implications, you just realize that their are soldiers who have families and are doing their job and you support that and want them to come home as fast as possible.<span id='postcolor'> So it is a lame-ass platitude. I that case I support both US and Iraqi troops since I realize that their are soldiers who have families and are doing their job.<span id='postcolor'> Yea, that's right. Â <!--emo& Â That's all that supporting the troops is suppost to mean. Â It's a problem when you try to use it for or against the war. Basically if you want to help them out by bringing them home just say "save the troops, bring them home", get away from this support the troops line.<span id='postcolor'> Ok i respect that, Its like when i here people say "No blood for oil" and i think "that sounds dumb, if you want them back home why not chant "Bring our kids home now" instead"

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (foxer @ Mar. 28 2003,20:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Mar. 28 2003,20:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Winters @ Mar. 28 2003,20<!--emo&)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">That you support the troops. It has no political implications, you just realize that their are soldiers who have families and are doing their job and you support that and want them to come home as fast as possible.<span id='postcolor'> So it is a lame-ass platitude. I that case I support both US and Iraqi troops since I realize that their are soldiers who have families and are doing their job. It's an extreme overtrivialization of the issue. If you disagree with the war, do you then tell your troops that they are doing a good job and that they should continue doing it? Or are you giving your support by demonstrating agianst the war with the hope of saving the lives of the troops? Â Those are both ways of "support" and they are as I see it mutually exclusive.<span id='postcolor'> US does give an option for them to surrender though.Iraq shots the allies soldiers in the head,and take some pows.So i'm hoping that all the iraqis surrender.I mean you gotta give props to the US military and some people in the white house.They didn't bomb iraqi soldiers for a month and then move in.They sent in the troops first. Winters,i don't want to be nosey or anything.But how did you get shot ?<span id='postcolor'> I was on guard duty and some cowards went speeding past in some beat up piece of crap and fired off some shots at us. One of them got me in the side/back i didnt even realize i was shot until my buddy told me. But the nurses were really nice

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Mar. 28 2003,20:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So it is a lame-ass platitude. I that case I support both US and Iraqi troops since I realize that their are soldiers who have families and are doing their job.<span id='postcolor'> You wanna support both sides troops go right ahead. its the same as saying "I hope this ends quick so everyone can go about their lives" Iraqis included.

If you disagree with the war you take it up with the gov't and not the troops. Maybe they just didnt have the breaks in life to have a career outside the service.

9--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bn880 @ Mar. 28 2003,209)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Winters: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I cant believe i have to explain something so simple as this. Supporting the Troops means just that. That you support the troops. It has no political implications, you just realize that their are soldiers who have families and are doing their job and you support that and want them to come home as fast as possible. You can still protest against the war (after all the soldiers did not decide to declare war on Iraq the Govt. did) AND you can still go to a Pro-Troops Rally. It has NOTHING to do with Political Correctness. If you wanted to be PC you would say something like "I support the war because my gov't says its right" You can be Anti-Government and still be Pro-Troops. This is not rocket science people. <span id='postcolor'> Thank you Winters, that's hopefully what so many Americans will realize.  The major argument coming out of Pro-War peoples mouths is that people asking for peace do NOT support the troops.  It's the main beef families of deployed soldiers have with protesters.  Quite illogical.<span id='postcolor'> They make me mad also  Last week i went to a big protest near my job, and i agreed with some of what they said and disagreed with other things they said. And then some dumbasses wander by screaming that they should go to Iraq and why don't you love your country. Little do they know that they prolly love this country as much as the next person and that because we are a free society they can protest as much as the like (as long as it is within the confines of the law) or show support as much as they like. I like to tell people who tend to forget this one simple line: "if you give freedom to one group, you must give it to all, no matter if you agree with them or not"

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Longinius @ Mar. 28 2003,20:06)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">And we werent talking about you. We were talking about couch potatoes in general, who like to talk much about their "commitment but dont really do anything at all to back it up. If you are not one of them, you are not one of the people who should feel targeted by the generalisation I made. The fact is though, that most of these prowar, "I back our troops" people ARE couch potatoes.<span id='postcolor'> So according to you, if you are not able to fight, because of ohhhhh lets say your overweight (not exactly fat, but overweight to join the service) that means you have no right to support whats going on? The problem when you make vague generalisations is that they are just that "Vague" If you want to gripe about something how about griping about the people who don't even bother to register to vote and then want to complain about the Gov't. THOSE people deserve my size 10 jump boots to be planted firmly on thier arse. But i know i am prolly taking this way too personally, But having been thier already i am sure you can understand the kinship i feel to the troops today. In short: Vague Generalisations = Bad People Who dont vote but complain = Even Worse Statements supported by cold hard facts = Good (but kinda rare) Winters = Angry that he got shot and cant fight now, but supports the troops.

I cant believe i have to explain something so simple as this. Supporting the Troops means just that. That you support the troops. It has no political implications, you just realize that their are soldiers who have families and are doing their job and you support that and want them to come home as fast as possible. You can still protest against the war (after all the soldiers did not decide to declare war on Iraq the Govt. did) AND you can still go to a Pro-Troops Rally. It has NOTHING to do with Political Correctness. If you wanted to be PC you would say something like "I support the war because my gov't says its right" You can be Anti-Government and still be Pro-Troops. This is not rocket science people.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Longinius @ Mar. 28 2003,19:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">"It is possible to support the troops from home, come down off that high horse of yours." Yeah, it also happens to be the easiest, least risky way of doing it. From your home, in front of the TV with a case of beer and a Big Mac, watching CNN's latest soap "Showdown Iraq" while chanting... - Go USA, I support our troops!! I reckon Hipp Hipp could make a lovely and humerous clip about that... (Hipp Hipp = A swedish comedy show)<span id='postcolor'> Excuse me Mr. Longinus but i served in '91 and i got a hunk of lead in my back to prove it (what the hell did you ever do excpet for acting like a smart ass on a forum?) so i am not able to go back and fight now. Does this mean that i am not entitled to support our troops? i don't think so. So before you open your mouth think about what you are saying first. There are those of us who are NOT fat AND do NOT drink beer AND do NOT watch CNN but we DO support our troops. Denoir: No you didnt need to explain, i am fully aware of how it works. I just meant to point out that Iraq is doing things just as bad as the US is (something that seems to get lost here)

Franceguay

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Antichrist @ Mar. 27 2003,14:38)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Harnu @ Mar. 27 2003,03:55)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yes, but this one is near Trosky... Â <span id='postcolor'> But town's name is Trosky long before the whole invasion started! So it could've not possibly be named after Victor. And do u remember the last mission in the Cold War campaign? The meeting in the bar? I'm sure I saw Victor there as well! Sitting at the table, drinking beer! James saw him but never talked to him at the bar. They probably have some kind of an agreement about that!<span id='postcolor'> That settles it, he is an ALIEN!!!!!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Mar. 28 2003,13:05)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">1--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Longinius @ Mar. 28 2003,121)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Unlike most people here Denoir and Balschow have actually been to warzones, worked with both British and Americans and probably have friends in armed units from those nations.<span id='postcolor'> Yes, I have three British mates in the royal fusiliers regiment and two with the US forces, one Army logistics guy who's still in Kuwait and another who is with the 3rd SFG, who knows where.. These are good buddies that I've served with in Kosovo and I would hate if anything would happen to them. As for those accusing me and some others of wanting US servicemen to die: piss off. It's you warmonging bastards sitting on your couches watching TV that betray your troops by supporting Bush who is sending these kids to die for a pointless cause. You are the ones responsible for their deaths. You want to support the troops? Fine! Get your fat ass out of that couch, grab a rifle and go fight Iraq. Then I'll respect your "support". Right now you are just a bunch of blood-thirsty war-mongers dealing in other people's blood. Â <span id='postcolor'> It is possible to support the troops from home, come down off that high horse of yours.

Just as bad as the Iraqis shooting thier own and sending missles into market squares.