TexMex Leprechaun

Uhh actually they did.

I own a 1916 British Enfield Mk.III, Swiss K-31, and Russian 1942 Mosin Nagant. I had a yugo SKS, but sold it so I could by Enfield.:D Also I have some old Swiss web gear. Bought another SKS off the net the other day for my brother's Christmas gift, and had to clean the cosmoline off. It took two friends and myself six hours to do it, was miserable

I thought about getting an Ak-74, but if do get an AK it will probably be the 47, like the 7.62x39 better than the .223. Great looking rifles Denoir, did you like the HK3? Just another rifle I looked at getting.

I am not sure that it was our good moderator, but I did play with a guy one time named Ex-Ronin. Other than that I haven't really, but there is a guy on the alliedassault forums named Col. Klink, wonder if it is the same one who makes ofp mods.

No the U.S. does not think like this, but its not the wepon that wins the war, but the soldier who does, What the man means is that we do not need a super wepon to win a war, just soldiers who know what to do, and have the guts to do it.

You have to treat people in a war zone like hostiles, for the sake of your own protection. Whats wrong with using more force than is needed? This makes it harder for the enemy to sucessfully attack you, and will cuase them high casulties if they do try. Plus it might make attackers think twice about doing something. Maybe there is a different thought process in Europe,I do not know, but in America we look out for our soldiers, and they come first.

Ok, now that the M-16 is going out and the Xm-8 is a go, will all branches of the military switch to this rifle or just the army? Plan on going into the U.S.A.F., and hope to get to train on this thing!

It would be great if you could crash land your planes, and chopers. I hope BIS will make the damage much more realalistic, like broken glass, and even broken landing gears.