Tigershark_BAS
Member-
Content Count
699 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Everything posted by Tigershark_BAS
-
we can get a soon to be released pic of he delta/ranger seals? i understand if u dont want to u guys just released the bh and all and now ive even guts to ask for a pic u guys still got loads of stuff to do by da way i cant get over how cool those bh are.. those scripts u use are legendary u guys thinking of a bas flagship plane?? with airstrke scripts like those bh???further down the line?? now u guys will then take air supremacy.....completely like america Trying to get some new pics of the De/Ra from Nagual. As for strike aircraft....no concrete plans yet. Or in other words...no comment...I cannot confirm nor deny....etc...etc. Seal pics have been done to death...nothing has changed visually....just weapons being jammed and scripts being written.
-
*closes eyes and rubs temples* Think of a happy place.....a haaaaappy place.
-
Kurayami wins the prize. First prize is dinner with Eviscerator. Second prize is 2 dinners with Eviscerator. Third prize....dinner with me Oh wait....4th prize....dinner with your choice of blackdog or waffendennis....supervised by a forum moderator (sorry Hellfish )
-
The Cog5 photo is truly excellent BD.....one of the best pics I've seen. Nice work.
-
Still in retexturing mode....but here is a beta pic. Don't expect it anytime soon...we still have updated Deltas/Rangers and SEALS to get out.
-
Thanks man ;-)
-
Bas ah-1w source code release
Tigershark_BAS replied to Tigershark_BAS's topic in ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Thanks mate....I've calmed down a little now. -
Bas ah-1w source code release
Tigershark_BAS replied to Tigershark_BAS's topic in ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Waffendennis...before you mouth off and make an even bigger fool of yourself...I suggest you have a chat with The Marshal, who runs your mod. He was aware of this move all along. In fact I gave the models to him days ago. And for us to give this exclusively to one mod would have attracted criticism from the community of being "elitist" or "discriminatory" towards other mods and members of the community. Next time engage brain before moving mouth. Jesus...we can't do anything fucking right....we offer to the community stuff that we could have just as easily kept to ourselves and you still fucking complain. I grow tired of this forum soooooo quickly. -
Yeah yeah, and I hope you die, we all have our dreams and wishes. Dude...that was pretty harsh.
-
Swimming and amphibian planes
Tigershark_BAS replied to philcommando's topic in ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
Amphibian planes.....are they like...planes for frogs? -
Bas ah-1w source code release
Tigershark_BAS replied to Tigershark_BAS's topic in ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
We were always going to do both...we just gave the USMC mod a bit of heads up. -
Bas ah-1w source code release
Tigershark_BAS replied to Tigershark_BAS's topic in ADDONS & MODS: DISCUSSION
No....as we mentioned....we are aware of another development team building a better Cobra...but it may be sometime before it is released. In the meantime...we release our work so that someone with time can complete one to fill the interim gap. -
You forgot the Desert Vehicles project.
-
Obi...I gotta play MP with you sometime...your games look like a lot of fun.
-
How about this? "Light cigarettes at their very essence, to me, are like abandoning the idea that I'm capable of quitting smoking." Like I said, if the door is already opened to killing as a means of solving our differences, then I see no reason why rules should be applied. Â If any killing becomes OK, then by logical extension, all killing becomes OK as killing is the ultimate act of lawlessness. Trying to civilize warfare, an inately inhumane and uncivilized act no matter what angle you try to apporach it from, is like trying to purify the smell of dogshit. Â Whats the point? Â If you can accept war as a solution to anything, then you have to also accept it for what it is, an ugly, barbaric and brutal act. Â Trying to make war more friendly or more safe is like trying to tame a Great White Shark. Â The shark is what it is, an eating machine designed to kill quickly and efficiently. Â No amount of rhetoric or rules, or the best of intentions is going to change that fundamental fact. Â Like the shark, war is at its base a brutally simple thing, dressing it up isn't going to change that. Well articulated!
-
Not in my eyes. The coalition and the US beat the regular opposing army. They destroyed the existing government and instilled their own. That to me is winning, as much as an occupying army can ever win. Yes, but the fact that one side DID play by the rules resulted in less human casualties. The US could have simply nuked, gased and napalmed the sheit out of Iraq. Maybe a few friendly casualties, mostly airplane pilots, but other than that no ill effects to themselves. But they didnt. Thats not the only reason. You can never win a war by taking terrain and then giving it back. This was probably one of the main reasons. Your second point hgad some merit....but the others...well....they lacked the critical analysis maturity brings to arguments....eg. why did the US give back terrain in Vietnam. How was GW1 a win when as you put it,"They destroyed the existing government and instilled their own."...they did not Ummm...GW2 was partially due to the fact they did not remove the government This was as a fair point: Yes, but the fact that one side DID play by the rules resulted in less human casualties. The US could have simply nuked, gased and napalmed the sheit out of Iraq. Maybe a few friendly casualties, mostly airplane pilots, but other than that no ill effects to themselves. But they didnt. However....ask yourself, since May 1...how many US casualties have there been compared to Iraqi casualties.....yes...the US spared huge loss of life...but only because public opinion would be against them......and now it is anyway as US soldiers are killed every day
-
How do you figure? Â Well see this guy who was once a very rich Saudi millionaire named Osama Bin Laden, and who onced volunteered to help the Afghani people toss the Soviets out of their territory with U.S. support, got really pissed off by the U.S. military presence in Saudi Arabia, and by U.S. polciy in the Middle East immediately after GW1 and decided to start a plan to fly some jumbo jets into the World Trade Center Towers, the Pentagon and the White House. yes indeed...thankyou Schoeler.....an American who remains patriotic but also has deep understanding about what is right and wrong with his country and its policies....I salute you *snaps right hand*
-
Major..it aint hard...simply make a blank.paa texture (paa support alpha channels....fancy word for transparency) and then copy and paste it multiple times. Rename each copy the same name as a texture in your soldier folder and then Re pack it...hey presto. Minimal addon creating skills required for this....however...if armed...your gun would still appear...on your back...in your hands...etc.
-
Of course you can. It was done. The US and the coalition won both GW1, GW2 and in Somalia. Dispite these tactics. And while there might have been some breaches of the "rules", over all, it was by the book. (During the actual fighting mind you, I wont get into the legality of GW2.) You didnt see western soldiers execute civilians by the dozen, they didnt take to using human shields, they didnt pick up babies as shields. They followed the rules and won regardless. How can you say it doesnt work after actually having seen the results? Ahem.....whether in fact GW1 and GW2 have been "won" by the US is debateable. And in fact...GW1 could be argued as the most significant factor in the global terror problem we face now. You kind of illustrated my point.....the fact that the US is playing by the rules does not mean the other side will....they are fighting to win still. Vietnam was lost because the US played by a "more decent" code of morals and ethics than the VC/NVA. When they tried to level the playing field the outcry in the US prevented any further action down that path. Also...the US has the luxury of playing by these rules as they can overwhelm the enemy with firepower. Lets assume this doesn:t involve the US...and lets pretend this was Israel vs Iraq....Pakistan vs India. Regardless....let's not turn this thread into a "is the US justified" kind of thing. The point was more that these unorthodox tactics employed by people who are motivated to win the war (not necessarily win it but motivated to) will always mean one side will not play by them.
-
Very cool!
-
I think we should fight wars with "Very Special" forces. They are deployed with different colored cards....and can hold them up when..for example....their feelings get hurt....their pride is damaged...their ego is deflated. And they could yell out things like.."Stop!...or I'll....I'll....yell Stop again!" And they all get a medal for participating...and remember...everyone is a winner today. Seargent...break out the party punch and cucumber sandwiches....it's time to celebrate our victory over the enemy...that's right...the enemy in ourselves that keeps us from realising our true potential. GROUP HUG!!!! ============================ In all seriousness.......as Major Gripes said...civilised warfare is an oxymoron. As much as I would like to believe....at the end of the day...wars are about winning....and to win...you are gonna do whatever it takes. Trying to be "civilised" in war has cost a lot of lives as there is always one side who will use tactics that contravene the other sides moral and civilised values. Suicide bombers anyone? Pilots in Sep.11? Women in Somalia carrying babies in one arm and AKs in the other? Somalian gunmen using crowds of women and children as human shields? Saddams human shield strategy in the Gulf? You cannot combat these with..."But...Saddam...this isn't in the rule book. 50 lashes with a wet noodle for you moustached one!"
-
Nice bics Obi, Scope and Oswald....very nice!
-
Thanks for the Bday wishes Blackdog and Abrams
-
Very nice BD and Zap
-
Awesome.....*starts chant*...more...more....more......more!