TheOmega

Check the Red Cross and UN websites, for documentation and history. Check the history and origin of the Red Cross. Check the 1st Geneva Convention of 1864. Check Henry Dunant, the French-German War and Napoleon III, for background And also Hague Treaty (1899) and 1929 for revision on the Geneva convention (POW's). And of course the final revisions I through IV of 1949 and subsequent years. But if i gather correctly u want info on specific limitations on warfare u should definetly look the Hague Conferences and Treaties on Warfare limits. Too many to recall. Simply put Geneva international law is for noncombatants and POW's, or easier to remember "for victims of war" (also called the Red Cross treaties, specifically the 4 treaties and additional protocols and revisions), Hague international law (all others) is for conduct in warfare itself. Well i hope this helps, u got more than your hands full. If u need any further specific clarification i'll be glad to explain.

mmm...Grrrreat Erex/Armourdave!... I dont suppose u have soldier models to go with that, cause im still missing a L2 for RMC.

Nice to see some marbles back together in the right direction. Rage... nice to see u promoting cheating with that cheat code post. Kind of defeats everything that was ranted about before, its explicit and worse than the previous allegations towards wolf. I dont think u meant it but actually u just demonstrated to who wants to do it, how to. I dont recall this ever being done by wolf. Sums it up really. Also nice to see u dont seem to respect the credit for the original idea, Kamai and Rage (although u did try to do some good with a constructive solution). So credits are also at a loss. Dont worry... but sums up this specific example, which also is present in the modus operandi of certain editing site interests passing for community role-models. It seems, like mentioned before, this issue had its origin there. That also sums something up. Lots of unethical things going on here. Over morality for you. I bites back. I think u call that hypocrisy. About the license... yes that is correct. Cant disagree there... apparently... that means for OFP that does include about every non-comercial unoficial addon, without BiS support, that has been released. A precedent has been left open in legal terms, so it has no effect in any court... That until BiS/Codemasters can defend a financial loss due to that. They have not, because it actually stimulates their financial gain. Understand this point when they are defensive about their tools. Understand also when laws are concerned that proof, intent, applicability and precedents can disrupt an apparently nice articulate license. There is more to laws that that. But that does not mean u have to disregard nor take it lightly. And try to take the game back for a refund, with that excuse... as the license states. See what happens. I guess u all can figure that one out. And i agree with those who mentioned its NOT open source. BiS has tried their upmost to close it further with the patches. Problem was the code from the start since the Demo. They realised this. There are solutions as i pointed before... and we all can help BiS too. So do your part instead of pointing fingers at the wrong ppl. Actually the problem also lies 1st within your own server use and with the unoficial addons (and modified cpp's) u use and individually have installed in the addons folder, that is enough to modify the config save. That is why that message shows up. Different Versions and languages may also be promoting this further. But pick where u left off... ure on the right track to the cheating solution... it seems to me a mix of cheating and the latter (which is not). You wont need me further, nor will i be available for any more of this since it has lost its point. Well i hope this has served a lesson to you all, alot can be learned from this for the future if this is to be improved on. And again good luck and keep it clean.

Well it seems u got a hot rod up somewhere. Actually that attitude wont get u anywhere despite your legitimate concern. Ah... the editing centre. Well they also have a hot rod up somewhere, and for a long time. Its called "chip en yer shoulder". Could give a damn bout that place no more seeing they have their head up their asses too deep. I would disregard any comment from them since they are not balanced. Hope yours is not the same case... well it has been so far. But seeing this is to combat cheating i'll instruct u. Actually its very simple. The info is there so u can use it too, seeing your all smart. He did not add or modify anything. He did not say what ppl could do with it, nor how. He did not incite cheating seeing from where ure abuse is coming... Bad strategy. I do not tolerate for imature ridiculous unfounded accusations, and i hope your not getting bad habits for the EC. Your cause is righteous... but keep it that way from now on. But i'll do your thick skulls a favor... if somebody used it for cheating... then somebody can use it against cheating too. How? Like those who modified for cheating... find a way. All u have to do is upload or check a clean config.bin from the start. So get around it and stop whining. You can stop it before it goes ingame. So ive gathered some info. Your server problems... and i just gave u the answer. Well if u cant hack it dont blame blindly. Doing so is letting the CHEATERS get the better out of u. 1st you are letting the cheaters get away with it. 2nd u only show the community your incompetence. Seeing you where all so nice to the fella, deal with it alone from now on. You should have asked help instead of insulting. Of course if u dont know how, u always can kick the cheater out, or change rooms. Simple. The info is there for ALL to use, including yourselves! USE IT. Of course if u cant then dont blame a-lone-wolf or anyone else for this either. Probably, u should be blaming Lustypooh since he started all this and wolf went from him 1st. Yeah that would be coherant from your standpoint. Why stop at him alone. Would not be fair from your perspective. This looks ridiculous on you and proves the points above. You just got more info than u deserved. And thats the only help you'll get from the light side of the Force. Brush up your manners from this point, u have no further excuses. Good Luck. And keep the rooms clean.

And he is not a hero to me. Actually he is a friend of mine. And CHANGES... are MODIFICATIONS (MODS). U cannot make addons without cpp definitions. And He does not modify the config.bin. You even can confuse this with different game versions. You must not be very bright i forsee. Probably i should blame your mother for your bad attitude, and your all your ancestors too. Same deal isnt it? Think about it. Look, he isnt stopping u to have fun. Where u playing with him over multiplayer? I dont think so. He doesnt. Like any other openable piece of software... and game, if u want to make this issue stop, Play with a clan, with friends that do not cheat. Make up a anti-cheater lobby if u want... hunt them down... u even can get my help if u need. I sympathize but u got your priorities wrong and directed in the wrong direction. Now blaming ppl for giving general information is something different as to what others use that knowledge for whatever purpose they may. Its called responsability. You cant blame him for others misuse as he never did and DOES NOT have INTENT for cheating. Actually, i discussed this issue with a-lone-wolf before. He considered in not sharing this data as he was afraid other ppl would misuse it. Any person that would have INTENT to cheat would do so no matter what. Its like blaming cheating on BiS for developing the game code... when in fact its the anti-gamers that do so. Its like blaming Einstein for the idea of the possibility to split the atom... and giving him the responsability of making and using the atom bomb. IT IS THE CHEATERS THEMSELVES THAT SPOIL THE FUN. Freedom is inversely proportional to Security. Ppl are free to cheat because game code was left open to edit in the 1st place. Make it too secure and no addons would be possible. Its a problem in balancing the two that has to be met. And that also means each gamer has their own share of responsability in this issue. Much like opinions. It is each ones responsability to do whatever they want with their freedoms. Even cast it away... for the sake of safety. (I suggest u disconnect from the internet now, somebody may be taking a peek at your configs right now.) Of course u dont understand this. It is not prudent of you otherwise.

To the guy that started this post. I will remind u that you are taking your frustrations on the wrong dude! 1st of All. "Cracking" (otherwise to "Hacking") the cpp file is useful for mod makers in adapting their configs for use in addons. If u use custom addons i suspect u would be grateful. 2nd He is not responsible for misuse by others of this information, into cheating. If u want to blame somebody, blame who cheats and who uses this for cheating, it is they who spoil the fun. Just your misjudgement of somebody that has dedicated his free time into making this game enjoyable to all. Sooner or later it would have been done by some1, for the good or for the bad. A-Lone-Wolf, fortunately for the OFP community is the good guy. Flaming, would make ppl not even bother in rechearching its internals. So cut the guy some slack will u. Its not nice to offend ppl in this manner.

This is an old subject already. No its not TL, i kept saying this! My best bet is that it needs a proper animation, being 1st frame without the flash. Somehow the current modding does not cover this area, so that is where i would go for answers.

Somebody asked for origin... well its origin dates back to the Vietnam war. And was picked up from the marine slang for short distance... "just a click away", and exeptionaly taken from sniper lingo and generalised. ... windage 2 clicks... (at hands end, close to hand -not referring to distance yet). To select fire... safety-single-etc (does a click sound)... and from there on to other language use with the same meaning... close by... and multipy. 2xclicks, etc. You wont find this in any book so you'll have to trust my input.

Well im glad to hear it, NoImNotJohnWayne. Akiro probably i should have used "knocking" instead. Ok, here is more of something to keep you guys busy. Simply put it an Identity issue at 2 levels. Country based and Nation based. When nation and country are identical then the 2 concepts overlap. Other manifestations of course as u pointed out is a disregard of anything that does not conform to nationhood. Independance complex...Xenophobia. Well phobia or "fear" is an euphemism... but yes... if the manifestation of fear is aggressive or violent towards outsiders. Then aggressive Nationalisms is what u mean. Not Nationalism on its own. There an abuse issue again. Just like Democracies, Popular Democracies and muscled Democracies. The last 2 are of an abusive kind, 1 of words (popular democracies=communist regimes) the other of authority. See my point. It not how much power one has, is what he does with it that sets its judgement... and legitimacy. Ok... Nazism... or short for National Socialism is not at all coherant. Its just fascism. National and Socialism are opposites. One is National... the other International. One is exclusive... the other inclusive. One CAN be racist (ah and the only race i know of is the Humankind Race...now there are ethnical subgroups - wrong concepts again to misuse)... the other SHOULD be humanist. It should rather read "social nationalism" if u want a literal interpretation of the discourse. Probably its a wrong translation from german. Stupid concept of wording... doesnt mean jack except BS to clog your brains. Well stupidity does come free of charge... but with terrible amount of interest attached. Nazism is an aggressive form of nationalism. The nation that was claimed was all german speaking peoples. Why? To gain back the lost territory from the IWW. Policy. And to gain independance and acheive full potential... more land was needed, not only any land... but land that held resources and german speaking population. Policy again. Just bollocks... France was not german speaking territory. And it went from german language to teutonic germanic origin people. So Russia and Norway... where ok... for them that is... ask any norweigan or russian and hell give u a different opinion. But this is used for policy interests. Propaganda was in fact something that was invented in its massified form at this time. This Hitler culture based idea is reminiscent of the Teutonic Alliance that actually brought the Roman Empire down. Cracked Europe for centuries since Roman era... And in itself proclaimed a similar Empire. See... cultural in its origin. Which in substance is a civilizational crack. His ally and greatest "friend", Benito Mussolini... also fascist... but remembering the good ol' days of the Roman Empire... wierd... shoulda go against each other if it made sense. Well i dont want to confuse you, im sure you get my point by now. This all is bollocks. Pure and simple. Culture used for political purposes. Mmmm... kinda same with a different twist of lemon tdy... ---------------------------- Ok... another interesting point Wayne. Yes i agree on that 2nd point. The US and EU do have apparently different approach. But i would be cautious with this. Apparently it does. The US was a confederation... and into a federation. The EU is a confederation and some want it to be a federation. Just simply its not in the classic sense. We have to put it in the context of time and contenporary circumstances. It would not work in concept and practice. Nationalism or Patriotism of Europe... Mmmm... doesnt make sense... yet. Language is an important base of nationalism. No way around it i forsee (except that all eurpean languages are of germanic or romanic descent- except Basque which is not yet clear). Due to that crack in time i mentioned. But there are other things... a similar european culture & civilization. All european nations have felt the influence of the Renaissance, Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution... and Globalization of course... and both world wars and other large "internal" confrontations. Living together has not been easy at times. Therefore the new approach... to remove these conflictual cracks of time, and prevent other wars... see the EU in this light and your on track. The US, well i see it as the reminiscent of the last great nations... and probably a resistant of the changes... if time proves this. It fights the flow because it can. But yet it also stimulated it, through commerce, sea trade, internet, through democracy and especially the market. It also however has always meddled against European intervention in its projects. Start with the American Revolution... and work your way up. Now its more complicated that this... lets say the US calls for international cooperation with others when its for its advantage and interest. Its called Realpolitik. Why? Because it can. Power is that simple. Thats why many attack the USA for its attitude. And also why americans cannot understand why some hate them so much with its Big Bully posture. Abuse my friends... u know of it... but why cant u put it in practice outside your own lands. Well maybe u follow what the British Empire did for some centuries too. Why? Because it could too. I dont recall any pure saintly nation that hasnt in its position. And if you guys could wouldnt you annex the stars for yourself? Human nature... is like a small child. And blame Richilieu and Maquiavel for this conceptual practice. European invention out of the Renaissance too! Forget this plagiarism... its overrated. The US, like states are a biproduct of globalization. And this global effort started with the Renaissance in the XV century. I do not forsee the end of national states yet however... they are simply too sucessful. In fact globalization cannot be acheived without states. The difference here that u seem to confuse its the configuration of international power with the change of some of its responsabilities. Now from this time we live in only states with access to large quantities of resources will reach full potential. Small states, or smaller states will have to join up and cooperate to acheive higher results of welfare. Only large countries, and continetal sized countries have the potential to be relatively autonomous when the "dire go straits". US is an example foremost at all levels... thats why its sucessful, with all the miscummings and benefits of that. States traditionally proclaim independance. The flow claims inter-dependance. So the nation-state HAS to adapt in order to survive... if that makes sense to you. The US follows this too at a level... with NAFTA and other regional projects (now suspended). But... it follows the market... so actually its this that sets the pace... and what made nation-states come to being too. [Not only this of course, but fundamentaly i mean. Religion actually had a part in it also in the sense that in 1648 somebody had the brilliant idea that religion and state affairs dont mix, after 30 years of head bashing of course. So some puritan dudes went up to the americas meantime in the Mayflower. You know the types that like to point fingers and have high strict morals more than anyone else forgetting that the right thing to do is let ppl choose freely. Stuck with it... culturally... bad habits being difficult to lose. Only some convicts managed to change their minds somewhat later. Sounds illegal activity to me somehow down the line. Dont take it seriously though, im not.] Therefore the tendency today is for regional cooperation. The EU is the 1st example of full economical regional integration... but its process is not over... and yet not proved successfull. If a political integration is to be made then this can be troublesome... it will promote further nationalism with the loss of national identities. Only one way to counter this. Substitute, and overlap symbols of belonging with voluntary acceptance from the ppl before actually taking that step. Otherwise it would be forceful and would not work... so if it goes in that direction all the previous steps are already in place and it will be a natural thing to do so. That which you mention would not be nationalism or patriotism in that sense. But federalism, and a something else different of patriotism. But yes the origin would be that, yet something new... or not. Speculating we would be here. Currency for one is not purely political and economic. It is also cultural, because its present in our daily lives. And not only for this purpose alone. Its at several levels... complex isnt it? Ok... think of this... go back a few centuries and think of gold coins (gold was gold wherever u went), with a kings seal on its back (marking kingdom and eventually also into being to a state)... Now come back to the 21st century, put an EU whatever. Same process of construction isnt it? Still the outcome may be something completely new out of the same mould. That should clear it up... eventually. End of lecture.

No offence but i dont want to tread on the bs. Easy to "spot". Well cow's where mentioned, werent they.

Well i have no idea how this started but the late post from Akira took my attention. Hmm... Germany yes... central position. Good linkages with the US and to other places. Britain another... stategic importance for terrorist passageways. I like that u pointed that out. Well to beat terrorists you have to think as one. Just u stand on... the other side... babylon... com'seyla. Americans are diversified. Self proud... naive... most. Young nation... self centered, egoistic... but good friends. Typical of teenagers full of vigorance. Also common with acne. Squeeze the pimples and pus comes out. Disgusting analogy. But its also the home of the colgate smiles and braces... perfection... of... the free to be so. But on the other side it has some Great benefits. Hollywood, jeans, burgers if u like em, internet, etc. Not all americans agree with their governament. And being free to do so is important. And i dont know of any unbiased, perfect governament... so why should american gov be any different. American-Western Democracy is not the perfect solution... recently it found out it was flawed... to american amazement. Quite frankly, i respect the US of A for several reasons. But being a supporter and friend does make me in a better position to criticize its negative points. Unfortunately policy is... has to be... pragmatic. Imediatism is prioritary... and well... self interest is felt with who the most has the capacity to go about acheiving it. Good ol' military pragmatism... for the good and bad. What comes after is not in the plans... Kinda like a dog... Like every big friendly dog it can throw you to the ground when saying hello as well as breaking the room in the process. U do not want to piss it off either, being it a big dog. Like every dog, its not also very bright most of the time until it is trained into something with a stick. However its nature is to bark at everyone... But that doesnt mean i dont like dogs... love em hot and with ketchup. Problem is the dog has the big stick... big dog... big stick... woops... nice doggy. Hushpuppy... Ok... bad analogy. I agree... but it lightens this up. ------------------------- Actually Nationalism and patriotism are NOT completely different things. Thats why they are easily confused. You need a definition i sense... well patriotism can be defined to a loyalty to institutions, law and society. Nationalism can coincide, but has a higher dimension. It corresponds also and more to a sense of belonging of a culturaly based homeland. Can coincide with a state... but rarely does, rather to a undefined territory which can correspond to the aspirations, tradition, language, history of an ethnic group. Mostly it makes what states are today or where, and borders defined around that space. If not, well wars can make for land possession too... lots of that... that still are reflections of this. Nationalism comes out of the French Revolution... and is a legitimate aspiration out of Tyranny, monarchies or any abuse of power of a few towards the many. Abuse is the keyword here... important. Nationalism was the basis for modern democracies. Dont mock it too fast... its in the essence of the American and French Revolutions. Same time period. Statue of Liberty... well its also in France. Read its history... it represents this issue. However, the point is that any abuse of causes conflict. National-Socialism, (a contradiction in terms-the idea of fatherland), Zionism (return to Zion-the motherland) are similar in concept. Problem is not the concept... its the abuse of it. Expansion of abuse... gives u imperialism, fascism, fundamentalism... Be it abuse of a state, be it abuse of a goverment, be it abuse of a small group of ppl - eg: terrorists also- towards others, call it abuse-"ism" is what has made Human rights be in the international agenda. Force should not... cannot be in the central issue of making any society into being... it only works eventually if all opposition is eliminated. To the point of human extinction at its highest.This is too serious to be held lightly. European Enlightenment has given Nationalism as well as Humanism. Humanism can also be misused into abuse too, when in fact its more of something else. Europe has just had more experience in these matters than the rest. Thats what differs... all have a contribution. Duty free or taxed. Arrgghh... there's the market for you. And that one does not regulate on intelligence nor heart.

Speculations again. Whatever... i do hope this tries to get to somewhere... so... i think we can take something out of this, getting on track then... Even if he is... then propaganda as u put it will merely put another "NÅŸ1 WANTED" poster up. It just makes it more effective for acceptance and public support. Its cultural again... looking for scapegoats, for witches... Salem revisited in reality or imagination, legitimate or made to be. Manipulating morality... why cant it just be ethics? Individual interpretation is edgy when on different starting points. Easy to be overly moral... hypocritical (cough-cough). Easy to confuse the two also, thats why it gets away. How high morals the Western world has... and with this i mean ppl. Look if something is to be set to right we have to stop considering these temporary solutions that follow up on to the next decade. Dont get me wrong, this Fundamentalist extremism is as close to nazism as it can get, adapted for our times. Same basic fundamentals... just adapted to our modern context. Substitute the same misinterpretation of Nietzhe to the same misinterpritation of the Al'Koran. Take away hitler's youth for entifada and taliban kids. Put an economic strain on a ppl, take away territory from the State configuration, put a criminal syndicate in charge... and u have Al Quaida or whichever name u want to give it. Same problem (although it might not seem as so at 1st)... different times. Thats temporary solutions for u. Problem is temporary political solutions. In 5/10 years somebody else has to deal with it... cause some1 just wanna win the next elections. By solving 1 problem we cause another... Complex isnt it? Thats why no 1 solution can be made to work. Of course we could all go for easy way out of widescale extermination... does that make it acceptable? Wanna go back to tyranny... fine... public opinion, law and justice doesnt matter there. Not something u can get away with in today's time... and it was precicely from that, that created the Israeli problem in the 1st place. Look... it isnt going to solve anything but 1 side. Wont work... So a joint solution has to be found so that israeli and palestinian, jews, catholics and muslims can get along. All these problems just for a different perspective of 1 God!!!! How ridiculous for me that seems. The Joke is on us and hes probably having a blast... or a headache. 1st religion cannot be used for political purposes and abuse. (Difficult to separate the 2 when Islam blends society with religion. From a purely academic point of view, its outdated... needs adaptation to our time since it had a particular context when it was written. . Problem here i forsee... mixing with ppl's beliefs. Well it shouldnt be imposed and it should be muslims for one and to realise this or not. Otherwise its hairy.Zionism also... makes a problem for the political interests and abuse under the stroke of security and survivability.) - Whichever, "Abuse" (of power) is the key to take out of this. [This is good for any function and situation.] 2nd Territory and population. 1 Land occupied by 2 ppl's of different culture. Clash... How to solve: live with it or not. Or then divide the land. Im sure israelis would have the same fate under a Palestinian Power abuse. Doesnt matter whos to blame... both are and wouldnt solve anything for both sides. WE DO WANT A SOLUTION FOR BOTH SIDES, DONT WE? Well if its one side only then disregard... Well actually Israeli's are also palestinians... since they also live in Palestine. Mmmm... weird... something in common. Take the hint. 3rd: Fundamentalism and World. Well fundamentalism, extremism... religious, political, economical... whatever abuse see point NÅŸ1. But i do have to add... it grew out of 1 problem into many. So its not only Israel thats stuck with... regional, civilation problems here. Mmmm, most problems in Africa... are also due to this... abuse, temporaty solutions, civilizational cultural probs... must be something here. For 1... what we hear on the news, our interest, our wealth, the way we live and progress is inversely proportional to what happens in these other places. We do live in a global society... mmm... Look into it... THERE IS. 11th september just confirms this once again. Solution: Change our minds about where we stand and to whom we are linked with. Having correct information about this is each ones responsability. In not doing so its just letting ourselves be manipulated by propaganda... and/or speculating... And this starts with the way you live your own lives, Moderate and post too. Important! Start early its easier on your kids later. You are free to disagree of course... thats whats good about it... isnt it? Of course that doesnt mean you are right... maybe just abusive perhaps. ... well i was just wandering with my free time so i hope u learn something from this... and thats enough for the timebeing.

Avon... fortunately u are wrong. Modern day conflicts are not resolved by military solution alone. If u do not understand this yet u should look into it deeper. Quite sad really hearing u say that. If u still have doubts i will explain why not. Simply put a military solution would mean that anything less than total war would fail. Arab states have given up on military option. Ask yourself this: Why? Total solution would be that Israel would have to physically neutralize an entire population. The problem simply put is that Israel was created on a already populated land, against their will. Im not questioning the legitimacy if they where nomadic, non-sedintary ppl, etc. The problem is not only political, its cultural from the start. Jews with their idea of a homeland and arabs with their own opinions. A holy city in the middle of it all. Being Religion that determined policy - Culture in fact- is in the middle of it all be it Israeli-Jewish or Arab-Islamic. Arab states made direct wars, which they lost, but the problem remained. Population and their will. For a military solution you would have to eliminate 1 of these. From war, will breaking would be enough. How can that be done without eliminating the entire population from that land. Of course forced relocation and concentration camps would be a solution to some. U tried that already... and the Arab states will not accept more refugees. And if they did, the problem would still remain... population (relocated) and their will to go back to their homeland. Simply put... military solution would not serve anything less than total anihilation of one part. I dont think Jews would want to have that in their curriculum... since u did suffer one trial of this sort and the world sympathized... and let u have Israel. Well i aint going to point fingers, u can read your history... and see whos to blame... which doesnt solve anything now. Now another point of view (if you are still not convinced)... why does the problem still remain. You have a developed modern urban society in one and a underdeveloped overcrowded in another. These have overextended families to the typical urban family. Cannon fodder... yes. Their weapon is not arms... its ppl and their will. Suicide attacks make this clear if u have any doubts. And too many youngsters unemployed and with no expectations are easily converted to whichever purpose thier elders can motivate them. So then u have an economic, political and cultural origin of the issue. Too complex to resolve by only one option - the political (and war, military option is an instrument of only one dimension - Politics). Its easy to understand to resolve this if u have these in mind. If you dont have these in mind you have a distorted idea of what is going on. Well if u dont understand this u dont understand the nature of violence... and have never been in the middle of it. Being such, its easy to underestimate, to call in so quick a military solution to this issue. Or then your letting emotion do the thinking for you. You would only resolve one part of the problem... thats why peace did not (will not) work. The problem is not War or conflict... its peace and how u go about it. Its always it (Peace) that has been neglected because of one-sided solutions... and thats why it always fails and will fail if shedded upon this point of view. I suggest u all have a moment of pause and reflect these seriously before u reach any conclusion. To the rest that do not agree u just have to experience it to see the truth of this.

Nice on the A10. But unfortunately i wont see it ingame since u decided to overwrite the original LGB a10. I suggest u make a non-overwriting version (of filename and class) and let ppl decide which one they want to play. Looks like a good job otherwise...

Make sure it is NOT in "SOUNDS" (plural) but in "SOUND" (singular) directory. Start there, no matter how stupid.

Mil dots r used to calculate deflection. In reality, they can be used for quick calculation spotting without adjusting the sights. Pratice for those variables is needed to use them correctly. With a red dot not possible to make calculations, without other reference point aid. Now adjusting the scope for windage could be interesting, but the environment properties dont seem to have such an effect as in reality. This of course can be improved in the future. Its only a game of course.