spooky lynx

I second this. BTW, who can say that some game is truly violent and will exactly affect every teenager or child in negative way? IMO people are too different, and somebody can go mad after 15 minutes of playing Quake or CS, and somebody is indifferent even to the most gore-realistic and bloody game.

This addon features both A319 and 320 MPAs, so I wonder, does A320 MPA variant exist, and which countries use (or may use in future?) either 319 or 320 MPAs?

No, just want to have this MTLBs in 'Russia' faction with russian crews, if possible.

T-10M had 14,5 mm MGs, both coaxial and anti-aircraft.

I saw some articles too.

And what about some quick BMP-2 reskin (both green and desert) with ACR crew? I saw the photos of them in A-stan.

As I understood, heavy armor units will be released long after other light ones (trucks, jeeps etc)?

NYX87, will it be possible to include MT-LB armed with NSV and another one witn ZU-23-2 on russian side (and maybe one more with default armament:))?

Atleast those for the front glasses.

Do you use DMA custom anims? I wonder if they work with 1.99 correctly. My OFP weights 25 Gb because of mods so now I'll test which addons and mods work, which don't.

Subject of the thread is "object 195", one of the so-called "Future MBT" variations. Now there's another one in development. Together with T-90M.

True, when EU or NATO-style army fights some bananistan armed forces who own 60-80's era hardware and can't even manage it properly. In other ways things can turn like Aircraft > fake armored vehicles SAMs > Aircraft Infantry > Downed pilot and its rescue crew ECM > Aircraft Enemy aircraft > Aircraft etc.

So... I'm interested in this question: do BLUFOR models of USMC, army, FR, Delta etc have not properly modelled equipment or badly done uniform textures? I see some members of our community make their own Marines/SF/Army addons - why? Just for fun or to bring in the game more accurately done units? If some ArmA2/OA BLUFOR units have any mistakes in uniform textures or gear, can anybody explain me, what mistakes do they have (because I don't know much about NATO and US infantry gear)?

As I know, this is not T-95 itself, this is one of the concepts, and the final version will look differently.

Indeed, takis need some more stuff to have. For example, some T-72s would be very useful (instead of BIS one) - T-72A(aka M1) with and without ERA, T-72B with ERA. And, of course, cargo "Urals" and "KamAZ" trucks! Also, taki skin for Franze's Su-17 would be nice to see.

I'm not great specialist in western weapons but I suppose that with current amount of available parts there's almost no dedicated models like M4 or M16... They can be converted to each other easily.

Yeah, some ArmA fans are almost perfectionists:)

Keeping this plain operational already costs a huge load of money:)

As I saw at the photos, only middle part of the frame is completely destroyed. Maybe other parts (tail and wings for example) may be used for rebuilding... Sad to see when such old and famous aicrafts get dammage:( BTW, is it possible to build a replica using remained parts of this warbird?

Looked at your MT-LB screenshots... Is it some local modification? As I know, soviet version with 12,7 mm MG is armed with NSV machinegun, and according to Wikipedia article, DShK is the armament of polish-made MT-LBs.

What about AI using it? Or it will be only for human players?

Not exact year, but I try to avoid situations when for example USMC units ingame have the gear that they never wear... or army officers wear ACU colored USMC hat *coughing and pointing at ArmA1 box*.

Is there a chance to repair it?

So what year does A2 marines gear belong to? I'm so curious because I try to have all units in A2 be accurately represented as much as possible:)