Sadico

Terminator 2 and The Hunt For Red October.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Even as U.N. weapons inspectors set a tentative date of October 15 for their return to Iraq, Secretary of State Colin Powell said the United States will block any attempt to send the inspectors back without a new mandate from the U.N. Security Council. Powell said any new U.N. resolution must make clear that any obstruction of the inspections by Baghdad would result in "hard consequences." "If the U.N. decides to send inspection teams back in under a new mandate -- anytime, any place, anywhere with no hindrances tolerated -- and Iraq tried to frustrate that, the teams come out. We don't play games at palaces. We don't stand around debating or arguing with them," Powell said Thursday before the House International Relations Committee. Powell made the comments as President Bush asked Congress for the authority to strike Iraq and repeated his vow to take action if the United Nations does not. "I don't trust Iraq, and neither should the free world. For 11 years, they have deceived the world," Bush told reporters as his draft resolution made the rounds on Capitol Hill -- to a decidedly mixed reception. Many rank-and-file Democrats questioned what they see as Bush's unilateral approach to dealing with Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, with one liberal lawmaker saying the resolution's language could lead to a "potential World War III." (Full story) The proposed White House resolution submitted to Congress would give Bush the authority to use "all means that he determines to be appropriate, including force, in order to enforce the United Nations Security Council resolutions, defend the national security interests of the United States against the threat posed by Iraq and restore international peace and security in the region." The president also said the U.N. Security Council needs to pass a resolution outlining what Iraq must do to comply with earlier resolutions requiring its disarmament. "For the sake of peace, for the sake of freedom for our country, if the United Nations will not act, the United States and our friends will," Bush said Thursday at the Republican Governors Association. "We owe it to our children, we owe it to our grandchildren, to make sure that the dictator in Iraq never threatens our country, or our children, or our children's children with the world's worst weapons," he said. Congress must support Bush resolution, Powell says With the Bush administration ratcheting up the pressure for action against Iraq, Powell's comments were especially noteworthy. Often considered the least hawkish within the administration, Powell acknowledged he prides himself on being the "reluctant warrior," but he was emphatic that Congress must support the Bush resolution. "A lukewarm, weak, eviscerated resolution coming out of the Congress would not serve my diplomatic purposes," Powell said. "War should always be a last resort, but the threat of war has to be there. And when a decision is made to fight a war, it's also well known that I believe in doing it decisively and doing it in a way that achieves a political purpose." The general, who was the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the 1991 Persian Gulf War, added: "You never plan a campaign and think it's going to be a cakewalk. If you've got the force, use it." "If the United Nations will not act, the United States and our friends will," Bush said Thursday. At the United Nations, a weapons inspections document was circulated during a closed-door Security Council meeting, spelling out that an advance team of U.N. weapons inspectors is to return to Iraq on Oct. 15, barring any further delays. That will be the first time inspectors will have entered Iraq since December 1998, when they pulled out ahead of joint U.S.-British airstrikes. Hans Blix, the chief weapons inspector, appeared before the 15-nation Security Council Thursday afternoon to brief them on the latest developments. Afterward, Blix did not mention the October 15 date but did say he hopes to get an advance team into Iraq "as soon as possible" to review selected sites "we think are interesting." "We will go there with an advance team, and we will gradually build up the capacity," Blix told reporters. Asked what sites would be searched first, he said, "I am not going to tell neither you nor the Iraqis." Earlier, Iraqi President Saddam Hussein issued a statement, which was read by Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri to the U.N. General Assembly, in which he denied Iraq has weapons of mass destruction. "Iraq is totally clear of all nuclear, chemical and biological weapons," the message said. "If anyone amongst you still worries that the fabrications announced by American officials about Iraq may possibly be true, our country is ready to receive any experts, accompanied by politicians from any one of your countries." (Full story) Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told a congressional committee that Iraq is "jerking the U.N. around." Powell admitted he was surprised by the quick offer by the Iraqis for the weapons inspectors to return. He said there is no doubt the offer directly stems from Bush's call last week to the U.N. General Assembly last week to enforce its resolutions. "After the president gave his speech last Thursday," he said, "the phone lines to Baghdad lit up. Lots of people were calling and saying, 'They are serious. It's show time.'" Powell continued: "For us not to continue that pressure by the threat of force, by the consequences of failure to act on the part of the Iraqi regime, I think it would be very unfortunate." CNN White House correspondents John King and Kelly Wallace contributed to this report. <span id='postcolor'>

OMFG!!!! Who is making that monster truck? When is it going to be released!?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tovarish @ Sep. 19 2002,16:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Well, a 'down and dirty' sense of morality might help me get away with things more often. According to your test results you'd go around voluntarily admitting anything you did wrong . But that's still funny as hell <span id='postcolor'> Maybe, but it also says i would rather kill someone than suffer a minor inconvenience. That doesn't fit very well with a god-like morality.  I guess i'm a very weird guy  </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Actually guys (and girls), I never answered any question with a violent answer. In general this is not a well formed analysis. I am not a violent person any more. <span id='postcolor'> I gave violent answers. I picked an axe to deal with "Zeus", i choose to deliver the message to the rival family carrying a gun, and in the one were a guy is gonna break my legs and trash my home i answered "start packing heat" I guess playing computer games since i was 3 and living in a dangerous part of the city have made me a dangerous madman

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">LOL if your sense of morality is "god-like" and mine is "down and dirty", how the hell is it that you have a 42% better likelihood of ending up in jail?!?<span id='postcolor'> It doesn't make any sense, does it?

Hey tovarish, your results are almost the same as mine! Only you don't have my godlike (and anoying) sense of morality and 88% chance of going to prission!

Speaking of cars, mechanic has just released a ferrari 355 pack with 3 ferraris

I don't quite understand what the hell does the test measure... It says i'm very intelligent, i'm a great observer and i'm brave, but it says i can't survive tight situations because i'm violent and i have poor sense of humour?? I don't know what class of tight situations are they talking about, but where i live, humour and good manners don't get you out of problems It also says i'm almost surely going to end in prission!!!!

Ouch... The Test Results Are In! "Your score is very low." Sorry about the bad news. For the record, you are: 51% Un-telligent! which is significantly lower than the current average of 60% Here is the custom report of your personality that led our team of geeks to conclude (with confidence) that you are hopeless in the pursuit of manhood: "The subject shows a very high level of intelligence, and his sense of observation is one of his best qualities. Considering this, he shows a lot of potential, but that's only part of the equation. "In addition, the subject exhibits brave tendencies, and that does a lotfor his score. "But what concerns us most about him is his sinister and violent attitude. While we almost find it amusing that the subject would rather kill something than suffer a minor inconvenience, it effectively destroys his ability to survive tight situations. Our study suggests there is a 88% chance that he will end up in prison! "Finally, the subject displayed a poor (and a little bit boring) sense of humor, a godlike (and annoying) sense of morality, and a hot shot self-confidence. The balance of these three traits is important; high levels of confidence, medium levels of morality, and a good level of humor make for the strongest individuals." Final Score: 51% Un-telligent

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I am currently making a Koenigsegg CC for OFP: <span id='postcolor'> Looks very good Great job!

Yep. For example, the republicans from the USA are almost extreme right wing for me, and they see Denoir almost as a commie But i think it's funny that nobody here considers himself extreme right wing.

Hey look, nobody has voted extreme right yet!

I'm a communist, my brothers are communists, my parents are communists, and my grandparents were communists.

http://www.dkm-mod.mkdi.net/ox/potw.jpg This is the POTW at the DKM mod website. Looks great, doesn't it? I don't know why you people are uncapable of sticking to the 100k size per picture rule...

Impressive

http://www.dkm-mod.mkdi.net/ox/potw.jpg This is the POTW at the DKM mod website. Looks great, doesn't it? I don't know why you people are uncapable of sticking to the 100k size per picture rule...

Now it says: No entry 'config.cpp/CfgWeapons.HKMP5K'.

It looks great, and i'm sure it will be a very useful unit. I hope to see it released soon. Great job!

It looks great, and i'm sure it will be a very useful unit. I hope to see it released soon. Great job!

The whole pack. The game doesn't start and displays that error message.

Ouch... The 1.30 version doesn't work. It says: No entry 'config.cpp/CfgWeapons.HKMP5N'.

This btr-80 is being made by the DKM mod.

Crap, i didn't notice the image was at a geocities site Anyway, i don't think that plane would be good in OFP. It was suposed to be a mach 5 capable long range interceptor.

Hey, the HK Pack for ofp 1.30 and the updated resistance pack are out! Download them at http://lostbrothers.ofpmatch.com/OFPHK/main.php

You mean this one? edit: wrong link