SKULLS_Viper

Just wait and see, Just wait and see.

Dogs would be nice, like in Medal of honor allied assault.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (WKK Gimbal @ June 05 2002,00:54)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">well, you won't if you use a hobby knife to take the parts off the sprues. Don't tear them off! Â <span id='postcolor'> I use a hobby knife!As a matter of fact, i have a hobby knife kit which costed me $100! But im talking about the tiny little parts.Also if you dont follow the instructions, and glue the parts togethor wrong, you wont be getting it apart, if you use hobby glue.

hehe, i can teach alittle bit of climbing to, maybe.On belay?Belay on!Climbing!Climb on. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Unfortunately, my country hasn't got as much as a single rock,<span id='postcolor'> How bout, is there any climbing gyms where you live? <span id='postcolor'>so rockclimbing would just end up being yet another expensive thing I'd have to quit. Â </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> It is quite expensive.You need a climbing harness($40-$200), rope($100-200), belay device$10-100), chalk bag($10), chalk$10, carbiners(any where from $8-30), about 20 of them, about 20 quickdraws($10-$30), 20 stoppers of diffrent sizes($10-20), 20 cams of diffrent sizes(and for one of them is $90 each! plus alot more.So you are talking about a couple thousand dollars.

Yea i love rock climbing.On belay?

I mostly have 1/48th scale model airplanes on my ceiling.I have also a 1/48 scale M1A1.It's pretty fun making models, except if you brake the parts.

hahaha!

I practically do ever thing. I like shooting, but i dont have the time to do it as much as ever thing else.

As a matter of fact, After upgrading from Me to Xp home edtion, i notice my score dropped from 2400 to 2170.

As a matter of fact, After upgrading from Me to Xp home edtion, i notice my score dropped from 2400 to 2170.

AMD would probably be better.It cheaper to.You'll pay $200 for an AMD Athlon at 1.4Ghz, while Pentium 4 at 1.4GHz is about $600, so theres a $400 savings there, which you could use to get a Geforce 4 or something.

Comon!Give a speech!My speech is ; 1.I'll let you get away with one post of a crack, 2nd try its over. 2.i'll ban who ever you want me to ban. 3.I'll will improve this forum! 4.i'll ban the other moderaters! 5. i will now charge tax! Please vote for me.

Man that is so sweat!Now...i just need to carry 20 AA's to shoot that baby down. Hey, i'll beta test it for you. Man i cant wait.

all i can say is ME!ME!ME!!!!

I've heard that Tow's with double war heads isnt enough to destory an M1A1 or A2, but the Russian have designed a triple war head Tow which is able to destoy an M1A1-A2.

I've heard that Tow's with double war heads isnt enough to destory an M1A1 or A2, but the Russian have designed a triple war head Tow which is able to destoy an M1A1-A2.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I've read from many sources that the kinetic energy from the round hitting the target is so great that the interior of the tank is raised to a few 100 degrees Celsius and that the crew would be killed by the heat. <span id='postcolor'> Also the constant pounding of the rounds could kill the crew.I remeber reading that in Veitnam, or it might be the Korean war(i cant remeber which war)But an Uh-1 only had rockets, and they spotted a tank, which was really a tuff tank, so the Uh-1 fired all its rockets at it, but didnt destory the tank, but he killed the crew, cause of the constant pounding or the rockets, and the tank never reached its destination, and the US live happily ever after.The End.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I've read from many sources that the kinetic energy from the round hitting the target is so great that the interior of the tank is raised to a few 100 degrees Celsius and that the crew would be killed by the heat. <span id='postcolor'> Also the constant pounding of the rounds could kill the crew.I remeber reading that in Veitnam, or it might be the Korean war(i cant remeber which war)But an Uh-1 only had rockets, and they spotted a tank, which was really a tuff tank, so the Uh-1 fired all its rockets at it, but didnt destory the tank, but he killed the crew, cause of the constant pounding or the rockets, and the tank never reached its destination, and the US live happily ever after.The End.

It's probably Windows Me.My computer constantly crashed all the time when i had Windows Me, but have noticed on my laptop which came with XP home edition, didnt crash, so i ended up buying the XP home upgrde, for my desktop and now it doesnt crash any more, and havent had one yet in 3 months.

Those "Weekly world news", is so full of Bull.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Some of you are forgetting that the Avenger cannon fires DPU armor piercing rounds. Â Those things can go through *anything*. <span id='postcolor'> Well i kinda am starting to belive it.Cause that gun can fire about 10-20 rounds a sec and if it where a 120mm gun, then it would only take 4 rounds to destroy a tank easily.Its just the 20 rounds a second is making up for the really slow 10 rounds per minute on an M1A1.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Some of you are forgetting that the Avenger cannon fires DPU armor piercing rounds. Â Those things can go through *anything*. <span id='postcolor'> Well i kinda am starting to belive it.Cause that gun can fire about 10-20 rounds a sec and if it where a 120mm gun, then it would only take 4 rounds to destroy a tank easily.Its just the 20 rounds a second is making up for the really slow 10 rounds per minute on an M1A1.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Hit_Sqd_Maximus @ June 03 2002,18:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I thought HEAT was High Explosive Anti-Tank. So wouldnt that mean unlike OFP that a HEAT round is what you would want to use against a tank in RL?<span id='postcolor'> It is High explosive anti tank.But dont let 'high explosive' fool you.Theres a big chunk of aluminum, or some thing in the front of the round, but the HEAt round hits so hard that the chunk of aluminum, acts like a fluid and it just cuts thru the armor like a cutting torch.Sabot is more better at destroying a tank the a HEAT, that is, if the tank has really good armor.But HEAT is the most used, Against T-72's. All though just correct some of the info, im in a real hurry.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Hit_Sqd_Maximus @ June 03 2002,18:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I thought HEAT was High Explosive Anti-Tank. So wouldnt that mean unlike OFP that a HEAT round is what you would want to use against a tank in RL?<span id='postcolor'> It is High explosive anti tank.But dont let 'high explosive' fool you.Theres a big chunk of aluminum, or some thing in the front of the round, but the HEAt round hits so hard that the chunk of aluminum, acts like a fluid and it just cuts thru the armor like a cutting torch.Sabot is more better at destroying a tank the a HEAT, that is, if the tank has really good armor.But HEAT is the most used, Against T-72's. All though just correct some of the info, im in a real hurry.

hehe, where is "no sharks where i live, but i wish there were".