Shabadu

It's called rcp-120 in perfect dark. Goldeneye had an earlier model they called the rcp-90. I've seen it in Stargate SG-1 and I noticed a mod making it a while back and can't remember who's made it, if at all. I'll find some screenies see if anyone recognises it.

No I don't know what its real life equivalent is called. Its not in planet of war, anyone know any mods with up to date/futuristic weaponry?

a) I don't have the time and b) I don't know how. Isn't one of the new mods going to be producing one? I think maybe planet of war. I'm going to look there now infact.

Whatever happened to the god thread?

33) Yaargh, aaargh help mummy!

Yes that's right I may not get on the forum for quite some time, but don't party just yet. I'm here for another 45 mins! Gonna miss this forum, and the rest of the net actually, but I won't be back till the internet becomes free to use at home or untill Uni in Semptember, whichever comes first.

10 secs left bye.

Yo Denoir, gonna miss your thread closing antics, or am I thinking of Placebo? Either way I think you have one of the best avatars.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ale2999 @ July 12 2002,12:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Aculaud @ July 12 2002,02:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ July 11 2002,17: 00)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Aculaud @ July 12 2002,01:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ July 11 2002,15:48)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Aculaud @ July 12 2002,00:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Well, iv heard some say that christ preached that the kingdom of god was within you to find for yourself, not in a church of any kind, so you do the math.<span id='postcolor'> LOL! that was the film Stigmata!<span id='postcolor'> No, that was my father<span id='postcolor'> Ie. not the words of Christ.<span id='postcolor'> I dont care about the words of christ, i care about the thought processes of other people. I dont care what people believe, it just angers me that someone would try to tell me i'm going to go to their religions hell just for not believing those things or living my life the way they do. And even if i did go to said hell, thats most likely where i'd want to be anyway, cause according to everyone who tells me this, thats where all my friends will end up too. ".<span id='postcolor'> hmm, no comment, well anyways I dont think that in hell u will get any hanging around time . If u go in china for example and I start preaching, I will be put in jail and might be prosecuted. Even thoe I dont believe in that system, it doesnt change that I am gonna get executed anyways. So even thoe u dont believe, it doesnt mean that u wount meet up with hell. I have a sensation that most of u come in the dicussion with alot of misconceptions....... We (christians) try to give u (non believers) our faith not for fun, but bcuz its our job and we dont want to see u guys going to hell!<span id='postcolor'> No you to give us your religion, ok yes it is your duty but, because of your selfish fears of going to hell. Quite frankly most people have faith because they are afraid of what retribution may come if they don'y 'have faith'.

So will they automatically go into the handgun allocation or the normal ammo slots?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (IsthatyouJohnWayne @ July 08 2002,17:26)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Albert Schweizer- "How can a nation that has travelled the whole world be so afraid now of what surrounds them? Turning from an adventurous risktaking nation to a defensive even isolative one?" This is nothing new. People of the British isles have always been wary of European 'adventures' (since the middle ages anyway) and much more comfortable with more distant shores, as is witnessed by the way as opposed to the mostly land locked Germans the ancestors of my nation looked beyond europe for trade and these 'adventures' you speak of. We are a little island and there are over 300 million of you on the continent and only 60 million of us. Of course we (all european nations) should trade very extensively and endeavour to keep good relations etc of course we should cooperate with shared(international) business contracts etc whenever it is our mutual interests to do so... but that does not mean it is right for us to have a shared constitution , be dictated to by foreign politicians (with only a minority from our own nationality voting) and rules and regulations of non British origin or be taxed by a foreign and essentially unaccountable power (so called 'tax harmonisation' ) we and our economies are too different for these things. As Sadico has mentioned Spain still has much of the Franco gang on the payroll (+ spanish people i met in the south didnt exactly seem very hard working for their EU benefits) Italy is still half ruled by the mafia (not least the 'Boss' Berlusconi)their government coalitions couldnt agree on the colour of the sky and the 'boss' owns most of the media Germanies government is full of guilt ridden sandal wearing peaceniks ,everything is absurdly over regulated and they want the rest of the EU to be federalised and the same The French political elite think they are a superpower and want to use the EU to dominate everyone else Belgium needs the EU to feel important in the world and is full of small beer glasses and entrenched paedophilia and its funny policemen These are the nations whos politicians we should submit a large portion of our sovereignty to ? Well i say not without certain fundamental safeguards that currently do not exist, not without massive overhaul of the current EU system (in which the people seem to serve the pampered politicians) Not without the purpose, content and legal authority/ accountability of the Executive and Legislature being more clearly defined and designed. (at the moment it seems like a very ad hoc politicians club- and that aint good enough by a long shot) etc etc etc (i can go on if you wish) "So where are the achievements of your generation? I have to admit I havent seen one! Or do you always want to talk about your grandfather and your grand grandfather, like little schoolchildren always show off with their elderly brothers?" Yes its true, since 1945 absolutly nothing at all has been acheived by anyone who is British (now would you like me to list British inventions/inovations/advances since 1945? 1970? or even 1980? because i assure you i could crash forum with examples  ) Most people in this country are perfectly aware that the future is where you spend the rest of your life which is perhaps why they are wary of irrevocably commiting their country to a international economic and political system that is highly experimental and carries a mssive quantity of unforseeable risks (though also potential benefits) The 'wait and see' outlook would seem to me to be the most intelligent, rational and forward looking. "Medium intelligent people in Europe dont hate english people, because you are not to blame for what has happened in the past" What happened in the past- like resisting nazism? Or do you mean the occasionaly questionable treatment of people in British colonies so unlike the kindness showed by the German Kaiser to the Tanganyikans in the Maji Maji rebellion of 1905? Of course the British are the only ones with imperial histories for liberals to wet themselves over, Not the Dutch , Or Belgium or the French, Germans, Spanish, Portugese, Austro-Hungary, Turks blah blahblahblah ran-....it looks like a slab of wood  (the weapon) good camoflage  <span id='postcolor'> {Wipes tear from eye} I'm speechless. Beautiful.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Duke_of_Ray @ July 08 2002,17:25)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I am all for dropping this. Like I have said before, we as Christians have done our job telling you about Jesus.<span id='postcolor'> I suppose you win then. We were trying to tell you we don't want to know. Jehova's Witnesses continually knocking on the door is invasion of privacy. People have the right to choose their belief. If I want to know I'll find you. Don't force your beliefs on someone they will only resent it.

If YOU don't want to continue the debate then don't. Others, like myself are free to air their ideas and put forward their opinions. If you don't wish to participate why don't you stop posting?

Why is it that religious types all use the same tactic to defer a debate on the credibility of their religion. You claim that those debating are either simply attacking you and being insulting or that they are simply ill-informed and that their arguments have no rationale. No-one is attacking christianity, I for one hate the idea of religion NOT solely that of christianity. No religion makes sense. That's the point of science. To make sense of things. We model atoms as nucleons orbited by electrons, to give a visualisation that enables us to explain their behaviour, it is doubtful that they actually LOOK like that. I forgot the point I was trying to make. It was something along the line of god being a metophor for creation and not actually being an existing thing more like an idea of a thing. Like time. Ask a physicist what time is and they'll tell you it's something measured by a clock. We know time has significance but we can't explain it so we invent an idea of it in an effort to explain it. Acient philosophers like christ were a little like early scientists. They attempted to explain existence, the problem is they had nothing to go on so they told everyone what they imagined it to be like, without explaining that this is what they think, not neccesarily what is truth. So to this day people who think this person or that person got it right hang on to these beliefs because they are so mentally frail they need an explanation of their existence. Damn I'm not very good at this.

We'd pick on Muslims but it's a bit taboo right now. Oh come on!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (residuum @ July 08 2002,16:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Christians contradicting one another!! WHO WOULD HAVE GUESSED<span id='postcolor'> Not me! Can you feel the sarcasm?

It seems to me that they're in denial. They want a religion that they can pretend they're all peace loving hippies but such a thing doesn't exist. Oh and watch you don't get too carried away paratrooper. This thread might get closed down. Or is that what your'e trying to do?

So they abhore violence but do it anyway? This is getting confusing

Oh I see. So they claim it's a peaceful religion but in truth they actually have no idea. LOL! I bet the people that protest it's so peaceful are those that never read the bible. Those that have read it and still proclaim that christians are good and peaceful people must be mad then. I think I have a totally different view on this now. Cheers residuum.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ July 08 2002,16:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (residuum @ July 08 2002,16:10)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">They have said without budging that Christianity is a peaceful religion, I have posted exerpts that disprove that. Â An argument is about proving and disproving. Â It's not about saying "I'm right, you're wrong, I don't need proof, I believe I'm right. Â You're going to hell!"<span id='postcolor'> Christianity is a religion of peace, if Christians do violent things this doesn't change their religion. Man is violent, Christ is not.<span id='postcolor'> How can you(general) claim to be christian and yet do violent things? There are very few people that follow the fullest extent of their religion, which in my opinion is hypocritical( if that's a word), I think the only people that truly take the full extent of their belief seriously are the likes of tibetan monks.

I think ale's statement is both true and obvious. If you beleive in god you have to appreciate that those who do not, don't wish to be convinced that S/he/it does. The only reason most of these religions involve convincing others to beleive is so that they are easier to control. This was the simplest way of taking over a population. I mean just look at that famous pagan festival held around the winter solstice, what's it called again, oh yeah Christmas.

Hmm, I don't think I'm getting the right message across. I appreciate that most medium intellectual europeans hold no grudges with us. Indeed the same goes for medium intellectual British. But in what country is the rational medium intellctual actually in control. I mean look at the US, most average Americans are probably very nice people, but then you have a lunatic like Bush in charge. Same goes for Britain, we have Blair and legions of middle-class arseholes. We need sensible people in charge doing sensible things like running countries. Rather than going around looking at how we can merge into a power to rival the US we should instead look to creating a solid, balanced country. This won't happen if you jump feet first into a united europe. Britain is in terrible shape because since blair got in he's done quite literally nothing. The NHS got a cash injection which seems to have been forgotten about, but nothing was done to see that it was administrated properly. Due to Blairs lack of ability to anything at home we have slowly been falling apart, unless we get our act together we'll end up like Russia ( I really feel sorry for those guys). So to disguise the fact that he's done nothing he goes around the world trying to look busy and saving the world from international terrorism etc...YAWN. If we had a country which we could say had no issues to be dealt with then it would most likely make sense to join a united europe, with the strength and safety to pull out if it all goes pear shaped. Preferably without losing the pound. I'm going to Spain soon and it won't be the same without the pesetas.

People seem to think that we're afraid of a united europe. Far from it, I HATE the idea of a united europe, as do most people I know, not fear it. The main problem is that most european countries, shit most countrys full stop, don't like Britain. Going right back through history no-one liked us, mostly because we went around taking over and imposing our will on everyone, the Americans have filled this void. This probably isn't the only reason but is most likely a huge part of it. The french still refuse to buy our beef, which is against european law by the way. The trouble with a united europe is that Britain would lose it's identity as we will all become 'European'. Not something an of us want to see. Except perhaps for those middle-class New Labour types. They don't care what country they live in so long as they can live their middle-class lifestyles. We've already seen a huge proportion of our population lose their sense of pride for their country, why should we then see our entire way of life destroyed to please a bunch of up-their-arse middle-class types?

What's all this RIP therapy thread business. I just got back. I would be the guy that no-one replies to. No wait I already am.

So is anyone making an update for the editor addon that enables the addition of te new buildings? They are so cool, most of them you can enter and probably all of them look like they have space inside rather than those flat boxes.