Shabadu

So we could be raped in the arse by the rest of europe, why else?

The medics self-heal? I've never seen them do that before! Mine just go off and die in a corner.

Why not simply scrap the EU? No shitty flags and we won't have to put up with the French telling us our products are crap.

What does LAW stand for anyway?

Hopefully this will end the matter.

I know you can assign your squad's members with colours. Do you mean larger teams i.e multiple squads?

Didn't some estate agent sell most of the land on the moon over the net?

Personally I have no problem with communism. There's nothing wrong with the ideas and all that it's a very noble cause. But unfortunately at the moment it is not a viable way of running a country. Idealism has no place in a world where morals and ethics are so low in many people. Capitalism is proof of this. I can't continue this without basically insulting the US.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (WKK Gimbal @ Jan. 31 2002,04:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">To have battle ships in OFP, the maps would have to be much bigger. And there's not only the one-weapon-fire problem. You'd also need engine-support for walking about the deck of a moving ship properly. While not doable in OFP1, this has certainly been seen in games before, so it could be done for OFP2. What I'd think would kick ass, is small gunboats, with a small cannon - equal to tank cannons in size and power. Then life rafts, ability to swim and use scooba gear! Yeah!<span id='postcolor'> check ofp editing center, I got some cool boats. Get the one called ach assault ship. Enjoy.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (placebo @ Jan. 30 2002,16:48)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So why was a thread (I forget which one) allowed to go on while some yanks were cussing Brits to begin with? It got quite long.<span id='postcolor'> What was the topic of the thread? And how long ago?<span id='postcolor'> My mistake TheHamster started it. But it went on for a while. The thread was in A&M and was called 'NATO more like USA USA!!!' or something.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (_Assulter_ @ Jan. 30 2002,17:03)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So u want your british weapons ? Then gimme my AK-5 AND then its just fair <span id='postcolor'> I agree. Bring in AK5.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (placebo @ Jan. 29 2002,17:55)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So are the yanks a bunch of terrorists then? They're certainly stupid enough.<span id='postcolor'> Feel free to have a discussion by all means, but please refrain from posting inflammatory, immature comments like that one, thanx <span id='postcolor'> So why was a thread (I forget which one) allowed to go on while some yanks were cussing Brits to begin with? It got quite long.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Wobble @ Jan. 25 2002,04:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The only people that would be stupid enuff to use nuclear weapons are Terrorists<span id='postcolor'> So are the yanks a bunch of terrorists then? They're certainly stupid enough.

It say's better engine, not specifically better graphics model. You eejit.

I know there are fat-off levels but the clipping is disgusting and the bouncing tanks is just plain dodgy.

I'm not complaining but the g36 is probably the most acurate rifle.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (sgtdwetzel @ Jan. 28 2002,18:10)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">It's virtually useless against tanks because thats what it is in real life....pretty much useless against tanks. Â A 66mm HEAT round is not going to do much against a tank, unless it is a rear or track hit....and in either case you are NOT going to get a crew compartment penetration, so all you did was piss off the crew...and told them where you are. If you want realism....the LAW is a disposable, one-shot-done weapon...it is not reloadable. Use the LAW the way it is really used....against lightly aromored vehicles (Gaz, Ural, BMP rear shot) and defended positions (sniper in tower, sand bag fortification, etc)<span id='postcolor'> Didn't say I was using against tanks.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Blink Dog @ Jan. 27 2002,02:52)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Who cares about the graph engine it's good enough. More mods!!!<span id='postcolor'> no it's not

Why the hell hasn't there benn a star-trek vs. star-wars game? I can even think up a plot and everything. It's not like crossovers are that hard.

Light Anti-tank weapon? So why is it virtually useless against tanks? The only upside to the weapon is the fact that you can carry more LAW rockets than you can AT rockets. Even so sometimes it takes more than one AT so three LAWs is pretty lame. Then again I guess we're keeping up with 1980's technology not making it up as we go along.

I'd like to see big naval battles. Well mabye not too big but it'd be worth it to have a coupl of ships of LST size and mabye a bit bigger. A carrier would be excellent.

People always talk about adding western units. Some people complain that this is all people ever ask for. What can BIS add in to give the russians? I'm not very well clued up on russian weponry of 1985 so I can't really make any suggestions.

WTF! What kind of beasts are you guys playing on? I got 1GHz 256Mb (unfortunately onboard grafics) and my game seriously suffers if there is more than a small scuffle in the street, and that's at 800x600x16(or it may be 32bit I forgot).

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (zyros @ Jan. 23 2002,16:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I always wondered, do you carry an mg that way. I mean in ofp the soldiers all carry the mg's the same way they carry a lighter gun.<span id='postcolor'> Typically not, Well, I assume ya could if walking real slow, and for short time, or standing still But typically machine gun is a base of fire weapon in a prone position. meaning it is moved up in sections/sectors to support and or defend. It can be taken in squad operation but again as base of fire Machine guns are notoriously heavy than other hand held weapons.<span id='postcolor'> That's what I thought. I really have lost the whole pretence that this game is realistic. The only realistic thing in it is the fact that you die easily. I mean since when does a barrel bounce?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Jan. 23 2002,11:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I found a addon called EditorUpgrade102 does everyone has this?<span id='postcolor'> This is the latest version of Gunslinger's Editor Upgrade. It is a very popular addon and for the most part is trouble free. One possible common side effect is the loss of information in tank's HUD - Heads Up Display. Just try a mission riding in a tank and see. Otherwise, go ahead and use it.<span id='postcolor'> So that's what happened to the HUD! I pressed every button on the keyboard cause I thought I'd donne something to it.