Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

KorpeN

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    319

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by KorpeN

  4. Posted

    I doubt that either BIS nor CM do design theyr game to fit in any league.

    Believe it or not, there are players out there that plays "just for fun". So if a game (any game) is ESL-compatible (whatever that means) is no argument at all.

    Maybe i'm just too old (read: above 16) for any sort of "i have better skillz than you, boon" style gameplay.

    When playing, i don't mind to end a game with zero kills but instead helpe the team as chopper pilot, moving them to theyr hot spots, do evacs, insertions and recon/spotter jobs.

    Non game designed for ESL.Is its community that makes it so.

    I play for fun too but I like also to compete against other people.

    It is a personal taste.

    @Red Kite

    Well said.

  5. Posted

    What the heck is ESL? :confused::confused::confused:
    Spanish sign language.

    Oh my god what a community:D

    ESL is the Electronic Sports League

    The good days ArmA was in there but the patch policy of BIS made many teams to disagree with which patch we have to play and the ArmA Ladder cancelled.

    I hope ArmA2 or OFP2 make it better.

  6. Posted

    So what is so great about OFP DR that has you trolling in a constant basis?

    Your post doesnt make any sense.

    He asked me why and I said I dont know why.

    What this have to do with how great is the game?:j:

    Ptolemaios

    Stop abusing the report to moderator button each time someone replies with something you don't like.

    LOL

  8. Posted · Edited by KorpeN

    So you're DremDC who was posting crap and trolling on those Dome PC youtube vids!!

    It all makes sense!

    Yep also I am a CM employee. :hang:

    Stick on topic at least.

    Hi all

    In reply to Ptolemaios

    Why has DR said they will not let the Pres have a demo then?

    If CM want to grab the kudos of the name of BIS's OFP1 simulation and claim they are making a sequel why is it missing so many key OFP features:

    Why will DR be Missing Jets you can fly?

    Why will DR be the Missing Civilians that add so much to richness of game play?

    Why will DR be Missing the Editor for consoles when OFP Elite had one?

    Why will DR be Missing a variety of Factions?

    Why will DR be Missing Wildlife that adds to the richness of game-play, as others have pointed out, the startled flock of birds, mistaking a beast for the enemy and giving away you position?

    Why does DR keep Missing release dates?

    And now we are hearing very low numbers for MP as few as 20! WHY?!

    What is it about the DR engine that is forcing CM to keep reducing specs?

    As I said "All in all DF looks like it is Missing in Inaction"

    Regards walker

    Honestly? I dont know.

    Why you dont go ask the CM devs?

    Those features you said are unimportant for a game to be in ESL.

  9. Posted

    Hi all

    So DR will not have a demo then?

    Add this to the:

    Missing Jets

    Missing Civilians

    Missing Factions

    Missing Wildlife

    Missing release dates

    All in all DF looks like it is Missing in Inaction

    Regards walker

    The demo has been confirmed a long time ago. :391:

    Missing Jets = Confirmed

    Missing Civilians = Pending

    Missing Factions = DO you speak about US,Russia and China?To me these are factions, no?

    Missing Wildlife = Oh,what a miss

    @Walker

    Go ahead and add:

    Missing support from the original OFP community.

    As there are no other modders or modding communities.

  11. Posted

    If people wants to talk to Ptolemaios, just PM him, ou could mods rename this topic as "What Ptolemaios thinks about everything" ? :threadjacked:

    Are you a moderator?If not plz stop pointing what to do and post on-topic.

    Thnx

    Guys you have to understand something.I dont support any of the games.

    I ll try the demos and what I like better I ll buy.

    90% I ll buy both.

    But even ArmA looks better until now than ArmA2 and the most important is playable and more "accesible" for the average gamer.

  12. Posted

    Maybe it's because most military rifles only have one level of zoom in real life? ArmA did have one rifle with variable zoom - the SPR, and that's because it was the only rifle that should have more than one level of zoom.

    OK I am owned on this.

    Sniper scopes were a bad example.

    What about the tank scopes and targeting system?

  13. Posted

    As far as your ban from from Armaholic.com goes, if I remember correctly, you were banned for badmouthing an admin and excessive flaming. Later using proxies to bypass the ban. So no, voicing your opinion will not get you banned from anywhere. General smacktarding will.

    Proxies?lol

    I just made another account with my real life name.And get banned again for what?

    And I didnt refer to Armaholic when I said banned.I refer to BIS forums.

    And remember when I said my opinion about ArmA2 everyone was like "If I knew were you live..." or "When did you visit a doctor last time?" very mature posts eh?And it was me that flaming..come on...

    And you think the same person that makes cows makes the scopes?

    Its almost as if some people think there are only 1 or 2 people working on ArmA...:rolleyes:

    So why we see cows and we dont see realistic scopes?Its ridiculous that the sniper in a war simulator has one level of zoom.Think about it.

  16. Posted

    Ptolemaios: it was just a joke/irony playing on the useless fanboi wars in this thread.

    For the record, I dont exactly see you posting much constructive either:)

    Maybe I am not constructive too.But there is a difference.

    My "non-constructive" "negative" criticism about ArmA2 gets me ban but your non constructive negative criticism about OFPDR or the "constructive" positive "ArmA2 will kick ass","The cows are awesome" posts (how these posts areconstructive) of other members are welcome.Can you see what I mean?And now maybe a moderator will come and warn me that this post is off-topic and flaming.

  17. Posted

    Because CM promised so much, they promised it could live up to the original, but instead gave us a load of droppings.

    It sounds like you have seen too much things so you made your opinion.Can you give me some links so I can see too?Or you just judge by the pre-alpha ingame videos?And what points exactly are that they drooped you down?

  19. Posted · Edited by KorpeN

    OFP:DR is a laugh, look, not even the forum software can take it seriously :p

    Honestly though, Its too bad they refuse journalist to record the gameplay footage they make.

    I would love to seen more details, especially in regards of weaponsystems.

    very constructive post.

    Can you tell us why OFP2 is a laugh?

    Codemasters seem to be lazy and they are just making excuses not to have certain features in the game.

    "But, its a relatively uninhabited island, and they were all evacuated, so no civilians."

    "Uhm...you have a nice scripted airstrike to use on your command, so no flyable jets."

    These are two examples where so many mission possibilities or simply possibilities in general, have been removed.

    So BIS is lazy too cause they promised many features before we knew the name of the "next gen game" and nothing is added in ArmA2 (damage system,destructible buildings,enterable buildings,smart AI and many more).

  20. Posted

    There's one aspect of ARMA2 that should ease the worries of most people:

    MULTI-CORE SUPPORT!!!!! :yay:

    Those AI worries? Think again:

    MULTI-CORE SUPPORT!!!!! :yay:

    There's much more room to maneuver and improve the AI (if BIS or community) with this compared to OFP/R and ARMA.

    I'm only starting to take a look at all the previews, but it seems BIS says that you should have 'at least' a dual-core. The scaleability will be fantastic.

    How the multi-core suppport means better AI?Can you explain me?

  25. Posted · Edited by KorpeN

    You're a very pessimistic person, aren't you?

    It's obvious those videos don't showcase ArmA II how it's supposed to be. There definitely should not be that much slowdown if they're playing it on a decent rig, hence why all other trailers look fine in terms of framerate. Plus, that website gave it a score of 81%, which is fairly higher than what big magazines like PC Gamer US (72%, if I recall correctly) gave ArmA. So obviously, BIS must be doing something right.

    Pessimistic?

    Do you believe that your pc will run ArmA2 with max settings?

    The Pcs of the reviewers are mid-high systems.All the previews shows the same bad graphics.What can I suppose except of bad optimization?

    ArmA looks way better than ArmA2.

    WOW 91%.Thats something.Maybe I must not believe what I see in the screens and the vids.I will believe just a number.

    91% very good job BIS.

×