N.o.R.S.u

Maybe you should use Mi-17 cockpit textures. Of course edit them a bit at first to make them fit better .

Maybe you should use Mi-17 cockpit textures. Of course edit them a bit at first to make them fit better .

0--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Nyles @ Oct. 08 2002,160)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Oh, and if you would release such a patch, it would be really great to have three more east units added to the game: Ural without cover, UAZ with PK and a Mi-17 without rockets but a PK instead. Creating these units would really not be that hard, as most is based on existing models. The added variety would be ten times worth the effort of creating these units. Furthermore East and West would be a tad more balanced in terms of choice. Even though a bike will be a funny unit, guaranteed, the three East units would have been REALLY useful at least. Let me add a "very urgent" to this in the hopes to get noticed. <span id='postcolor'> Something I've been waiting from the start. But some small things like missing equipment pictures/info (MineE, Strela, SmokeShells red&green) would be nice also (though it's very easy to fix these things by user himself).

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">In my opinion, this guy is a citizen of the US, and he might have some motive, like anti-war, anti-Israeli, anti-govt in general, anti-American!... something like that.<span id='postcolor'> Well this guy shot 13 year old school boy to critical condition , so I don't think there's any motives left...

Visit http://ofp.gamezone.cz for more pics. Looks good and it's for Russians . I wonder how many polys would that be... .

Doh stupid me, I never look at the Breathe forums . Mods please lock/delete this one.

Maybe we should make new models with O2 and use UCE's textures (with his permission of course) to make highly accurate modern SpetzNaz units?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (N.o.R.S.u @ Oct. 06 2002,17:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Chechnya pictures: http://www.pbase.com/igor01/chechnya (Pictures have been rated M for some violence.)<span id='postcolor'> Oh, and while visiting the gallery please write a reply to that site .

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Then why won't Kegetys release his winter Nogova?<span id='postcolor'> Because Nogova and its foliage is big part of Resistance... (I think Kegetys has explained this plenty of times already ) </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">did you put the res models into the dta/data3d.pbo, or the res/dta/data3d.pbo? Cos if it was the first one then that will be what caused the CTD. If it was the second one then there could be a problem there - probably mission design related? i wouldn't know without testing.<span id='postcolor'> Yes I put the new Data3D.pbo to res\dta\hwtl\ and to res\dta\ still a CTD . But! New Data.pbo works well in MP and SP, I have replaced BIS' AK-47, AK-74 and AK-47CZ textures with UCE's photorealistic AK-textures and I have also replaced BIS' XM-textures with Fliper's(?) ones.

Comparing the RL picture and yours, I must say nice work again. Also that RL Mi-26 looks nice with the darker painting, maybe you should make a bit darker camo for your Mi-26?

Comparing the RL picture and yours, I must say nice work again. Also that RL Mi-26 looks nice with the darker painting, maybe you should make a bit darker camo for your Mi-26?

Every new "IRL feature" is good for OFP. Besides pistols are good for cutscenes, they are fun (yesterday we were having competition with Kegetys' revelvors in MP, Western style I mean ), pistols are good if you want to simulate high ranking officers on the field etc... Next weapon class that would be included some day should be artillery/infantry mortar.

I don't know I just quoted that warning from OFPEC forum (yes I'm lazy). M would be correct I think .

Chechnya pictures: http://www.pbase.com/igor01/chechnya (Pictures have been rated M for some violence.) *edit* R-rating changed to M-rating .

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (xmurderx @ Oct. 05 2002,21:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (blackdog~ @ Oct. 05 2002,20:14)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I don't like when you get in as cargo, you go to the cabin. If someone made a 747 like that (4 crewmen in cabin) it would just ruin the whole point of a passenger jet considering most pilots don't let people into the cabin...<span id='postcolor'> thats why you fill up those cabin seats with crew, then when you get in as cargo you sit in a seat. ive never seen a 747 fly with just a pilot, its ruining the whole point of a realistic aircraft.<span id='postcolor'> Exactly, xmurderx is right. I suggest that you make seats for pilot and gunner, make the three extra crew seats as normal seats. Rest is up to mission maker if he want's to fill up those three extra seats with pilots as cargo to make his mission more realistic . And like Evis said, commander won't work right in chopper.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (xmurderx @ Oct. 05 2002,21:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (blackdog~ @ Oct. 05 2002,20:14)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I don't like when you get in as cargo, you go to the cabin. If someone made a 747 like that (4 crewmen in cabin) it would just ruin the whole point of a passenger jet considering most pilots don't let people into the cabin...<span id='postcolor'> thats why you fill up those cabin seats with crew, then when you get in as cargo you sit in a seat. ive never seen a 747 fly with just a pilot, its ruining the whole point of a realistic aircraft.<span id='postcolor'> Exactly, xmurderx is right. I suggest that you make seats for pilot and gunner, make the three extra crew seats as normal seats. Rest is up to mission maker if he want's to fill up those three extra seats with pilots as cargo to make his mission more realistic . And like Evis said, commander won't work right in chopper.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">and then repacked into the "data3d.pbo" so that mp does not consider it as cheating (only the model will be changed), and the game feels/looks more realistic.<span id='postcolor'> If you want use edited models in MP, then all other players (and server) must have the "improvement pack" installed. Like I said before, I tried to raise the athmosphere by putting Resistance tree models into data3d.pbo. It worked well in SP but in MP I got CTD . So I assume that it's not possible to use modified data3d.pbo in MP. But it will work perfectly in SP (increases replayability of OFP campaigns).

If you edit the soldier models and try to use them in multiplayer for better athmosphere the game just crashes. I replaced the old tree models with high quality ones from Resistance, but when I tried them in MP I got CTD . So I assume that same happens if you use edited soldier models . But the replaced tree models worked well in single player, so edited soldiers should also work well in SP . Releasing addons that are made from edited original models shouldn't be a problem. After all there are hundreds of addons made from original OFP models by retexturing them...

Look great. I raise my thumbs up for this one. Could you show us a pic where a soldier stands next to it ,or compared to another chopper. Just wanting to see the size of this monster .

Look great. I raise my thumbs up for this one. Could you show us a pic where a soldier stands next to it ,or compared to another chopper. Just wanting to see the size of this monster .

All tanks in OFP except Shilka, Vulcan and M113 have windows big enough in front that you can drive easily with them, if you are using 1st person mode. But in the three tanks I mentioned you can't see a thing because driver proxys are a bit out of place. Shilka has the worst view.

Use "desertEagle" and "desertEagleMag" .

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Antichrist @ Oct. 03 2002,04:54)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Instead of making 20 shit quality cars he cou;d've made 5 good quality<span id='postcolor'> I think his Lada is the best user made car addon. And we can always edit Mehanics configs to make his cars more realistic and giving him the full credit. IMO Mehanic made good job on his addons, specially his last cars; Lada, Golfs, Volvo and Boxer were high quality (except sounds and realism in car behaviour, but those two are very easy to fix). And one thing most peole are forgotting is that he released his addons. I don't see many new O2 made addons bigger than weapons released these days. Like Fubar said IYDLIDDI .

Resistance side jeep is Willy's Jeep. It's the same that was in first OFP demo (BIS only added FIA markings to it). West jeep is Mutt just like [TU]$33ker said.

Colours? How about making them in same colours as BIS' civ cars are (white, red/orange, yellow, light blue, light green), would fit very well. And also the textures could be a bit rusty with some dirt on them. Make them look like cheap farmer cars just like Skodas are now in OFP .