ManDay

I did a clean of install of ArmA lately and now my view is constantly zoomed out. I can zoom in by pressing RMB for example but as I'm already zoomed out zooming out further doesnt work. After releasing RMB the view returns to the wide-angle view. As there is some new Control-Item for zooming out permanently I tried to bind a key to it and press it so the view returns to normal but this failed. Any idea? Edit: This is what it looks like by default when I change to optics:

Can someone eventually get rid of these two (three) guys? Seriously, what are they here for but annoying the crap out of everyone? Make the forum a better place to discuss and give them a ticket, please!

Wow, more than 40 new pages in just one day, that must be a new record :D (for being taken a tour by trolls, too)

Laying low somewhere on the Maldives :D

Source? Quote? I remember having heard something similar, though, iirc, it has only been something like "there will no modding tools be released with the game". Any-how, that's how rumours emerge - one reads "No modding tools are shipped on release" in an interview, the next only remembers "no modding tools" and then comes along Leopardi, claiming that OFP/DR will not support mods at all...

I think you got stuck in the wrong place here. Full-heartedly fairly some would agree (provided that you could put a little more structure into your thoughts) and take it even far beyond, but guess what, this is the public just who you are speaking to through these forums - please remain proportionately shallow for we like shooting people up on a 24" :bounce3:

Master Of Orion II, anyone? Best game I've ever played (besides OFP and Deus Ex) - I've tried G/C once (was it I or II?) but I think once you fell in love with MOO there is no other besides her :D

Thanks Hat.

cjsoques, point taken. But I want to remind you that it's probably not just me who takes statements such as "this is pathetic" and "this is a step backwards/reduces quality" as claiming objectivity. But it's clear now. Well, I too naturally don't want to wait one hour to join a game, lol :D I rather expect to join the next and most filled server which is currently lobbying.

No need to feel offended, mate. I'm following this thread successively and may not always have the latest pages in mind thus clearly. Yes, it has been confirmed on the official forums, too. But it's again one of these "what ArmA-boy is not aquainted with from ArmA, ArmA-boy hates"-like phenomena (I'm thereby not calling you an "ArmA-boy", just in case...) that you call it pathetic and a "step backwards". Some people - and yes, this time I'm including you - still appear not to have understood the concept of opinions. You know, those things that everybody seems to have. You should refrain from calling out "pathetic", "reduce quality", "watered down" or alike all because you personally dislike it, dearest fellow member. Realize that it's matter of taste what one likes or dislikes. To provide you the most obvious instance, the people who have decided to put that in don't deem it "pathetic" and a "loss of quality" and so do others. You dissent - feel free to do so, but respect other people's opinions for what they are. I, for my part, am fine with both - no JiP and JiP. Where latters allows for more dynamics on a server as for joins and parts, the former is well suited to prevent a clutter of players and join/parts. It also repels the kind of gamer who quickly joins a session to cause a mess and leave when getting bored - yes, that's what I've experienced over and over again on ArmA's public servers. I'm not going to argue on the benefits of this decision because I think if you put a little thought into the whole situation, you will see them yourself. I've always been happy with how America's Army did it and although OFP/DR is a different type of game, both is possible, for any game. Edit: I'm aware of the major disadvantages, too.

Yes, see the new wesbite, it gives info there. I misunderstood the meaning of JiP. I think no JiP in terms of Americas Army is fine and don't know why this would be considered a limitation. It's just different from ArmA.

Where have you got this from? To my knowledge this applies to COOP-Mode not to generic MP. Please validate your source.

Still, I might be mistaken but I think a CPU takes disproportionately more ressources for the simplest pixel-related operations than a GPU would. So, flame me if I'm wrong, but I still think there will be a more than noticeable amount of stress on the CPU. Well, let's see what doakwolf reports :)

Well you know how intensively graphical operations load on a CPU - I very much doubt that the CPU takes over the job alone. But you are right, it must go "through" the CPU at least, because there is no way the GPU could directly interface the USBC.

I think it's a waste of money. No bullshit, but I think if you can spare money for a separate screen to display harware specs, you must have too much of it. But I'm curious how the thing performs, so let us know. USB 2.0 provides maximum 2.5 Watt as by the specs - I wonder how an LCD can possibly feed on that. And by the way I wonder what will be the additional load on your GPU. It must require your GPU to render the screen too, which I think chips are far from being optimized for. Please let us know how much your framerate drops (if it does) when you use the screen.

":D" Firstly, your observation is not totally off but certainly not correct either. There is a lot of speculation on the Codemasters forums the main cause of which are threads like "Will ... be in the game?" by newcommers, admitted. However, that's just one aspect of the whole and again, you, by your comment which just accounts for a specific part of an issue, very much portray the overall unobjective attitude of this thread and its posters. Codemasters' OFP/DR forums, despite all the speculation which is inevitable on a forum of a not-yet-released game, serve as a place for feedback to the team developing the game, for suggestions and stating wishes, trading information about the game and, of course, small talk. Now, if this was a normal discussion with normally thinking people, I'd stop argueing here, but judging from the past 270+ pages, I reckon I wont be left alone, my post teared to flakes, rather, unless I literally quote some of the threads (mind, all from the first page of the GD section), which are "more than sheer speculation" (in contrary to the greater part of this thread): Second, I havn't visited the ArmA 2 Section - neither up to now, nor before ArmA 2 was released - but you may have. So I'm asking you: What are forums for an unreleased videogame usually like? I'm not much into videogames and online communities, but I've experienced two for the time being, and the Codemasters OFP/DR are, compared to the other, very much productive, active and community-driven.

I wonder what will happen to this thread once the game is released... :D The past 272 pages, really, are the product of sheer speculation. Where will you direct all your anger at once there is no more "academic speculation" on "will it be more or less realistic than ArmA2", "will the textures in the final version live up to the expectations" and "Feature ... is not in the game - or is it?!"? A thread on OFP3, may be? :D Come, join us at the Codemasters forums, we are one step ahead of you over there - having already started on a thread about Arrowhead and bashing the crap out of it! It's real fun, the genuine Operation Flashpoint Community is way better at that - 512 pages - we have successfully spread rumours that BIS employees are being sacrified for the triumph of Arrowhead already! :D of course I'm just kidding

The grenade ignited a stack of ammunition (true).

A month :bounce3: Haha, ok I think it looks quite nice and modest, almost a little simplistic. However, I'd remove the shadow drop on the arrows and the beven on them - they appear just not to fit in. You may want to add a gradient-like, slightly diagonal glossy shine to the arrows (?!) ! :)

The stereotype is that nerds are nerdy, which is an overspecific kind of knowledge. Nerds are the little intelligent and certainly among the least intellectual people of our society. A nerd is uncapable of expressing himself, even if he's given all time in the world to phrase his thoughts in written language. A nerd has nothing of globally relevant knowledge and thinks he knows it all. A nerd is the class of least conducive element a developed society can bear. He's the kind overcivilized entity, who has lost even the last relation to reality. A nerd makes up a wrong word in nescience and so do a thousand other nerds. Since the internet is filled with nerds, you'll find a thousand instances of the word on google. Congratulations. You think if a word is used often enough it becomes eligible? Well then, consider "moddable" an official word of nerd-vocabulary, but not of the vocabulary of normal people.

Wikipedia is the hive of all nerds, I wouldn't trust it with any of my words!

No it's "modifiable". Freakin' nerds trying to make up new words...

Honestly I don't think it's that hard to do that, given that you can hold the thing and its massive weight like that in your two hands. The recoil goes - as momentum - mainly back into the body of the weapon and is thus not that hard for the "holder" to handle. Might be wrong tho - I've never fired such a thing. I agree it looks insane, tho :D

Exactly :p That's why I was wondering. Couldn't pinpoint it, though.

Are 209 pages to much for the software to take, I'm somewhat getting the feeling... ? Edit: Okay, nevermind...