Jump to content
Bohemia Interactive Forums

MrMilli

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Medals

Posts posted by MrMilli

  1. Posted

    I recieved this error and followed this advice

    Quote[/b] ]I think this error occurs when you change which version of ArmA.exe you are using, but do not update your p:\ drive with the relevant support files for the updated ArmA.exe.

    Specifically, the bin folder, the product.bin in the dta folder and possibly the core folder.

    The bin folder holds the shaders I believe, as well as other files needed.

    Planck

    and reinstalled O2 and this error went away (another one appeared, but nevermind - its explicitly stated o2 is unsupported software)

  2. Posted

    Graphics are poooor

    look at the demo- they don't get any better in the full game!

    'Dynamic campaign' is nothing more than a bunch of randomly generated missions for poor reward

    (IE lose a tank/whirlybird rescuing a hostage get ONE... WHOLE... RIFLE)

    Customised textures are a good idea, but make for poor quality texturing on models

    No interior views on any vehicles, no first person on vehicles, camera not fixed making driving... interesting

    AI is hideously bad.

    Footsoldiers

    "Run towards player firing"

    "Stand still firing at player out in open"

    "Run towards tank praying"

    Tank AI

    "Drive full speed towards player tank."

    Thats it.

  4. Posted

    Quote[/b] ]two soldiers. The UK does slightly better: 415 British troops currently wear blue helmets.

    Considering the British sent about 200,000 people to fight the gulf war 2 (As far as i know from what the BBC said), 415 troops is not bad. Also, as is being seen in Iraq now, the British are more experienced at Peacekeeping, with theatres such as ireland behind them. The US military is not really built for that kind of operation, it would seem. This just doesn't look like something they are good at.

    That your expert well researched opinion?

    The entire regular force of the British Army is around the 100,000 mark.

    Ireland is spelt with an capital I and if you want to be technical, British forces never conducted operations in Ireland.

  5. Posted

    Yeah, they do seem to come out directly out of a dodgy movie, and those missiles (if they are that) seem phony as hell, reminds me an action-man vehicle, and i wouldnt want to be near that car when those missiles are shot.

    on a side note:5.8x42mm...now that is a weird caliber.

    5.8 is a new caliber, or though it seems weird, but from what i have got, it seems that they are more powerful then a 5.56, but as for the stopping power, it still unknow

    (and dont forget, they are still in developement)

    "new" "still in development"

    It finished development in 1987.

    It would of been on issue in 1987 but the system it was designed for was rejected.

  8. Posted

    Scorpian is none better, I believe it's got a 76mm or a 30mm

    it is not a tank

    Combat Vehicle Reconaissance (Tracked)

    quick look for pictures shows this

    scorpion-ie.jpg

    I think if they were procured in 96/98 they would have the 30mm used in Warrior.

    They would be blown away by any MBT in the time it takes to say "Look at that daft cu...."

  14. Posted

    Come on, so you really think that the attitude of  'oh the snipers could do it easier' is really a good alternative?

    If they couldn't do it without placing an enourmous risk on innocents, they shouldn't have attempted it at all.

    I'm not saying firing off missiles is the answer but please, a little more thought into comments. Which is easier and risks the fewest Israeli lives?

    So your implying that an Israeli soldier's life is more valuable than an innocent Palestinian's?

    Sending in a group of soldiers who have to infiltrate the area, set themselves up, kill the guy and then sneak out without getting into a contact requiring weeks of planning and risking some of the best soldiers they have to offer?

    or firing off a missile from a few miles away and a few thousand feet up?

    Of course. It's what special forces from all over the world do.

    I'll be honest and say it pisses me off when people say things like that, how many people just went 'Oh they could of just got a few snipers and killed Saddam' a few months ago?

    I sure never said that about Hussein. There is a difference between Saddam Hussein and the leader of Hamas - the Isrealis knew where the leader of Hamas was.

    1) Two killed.

    Bad, but hardly enormous civilian casualties.

    2) To an Israeli Commander?

    Any day of the sodding week.

    3) So, your saying you'd rather an infantry force get into a fight in a crowded street?

    How many do you think would die then? Bullets flying about, adrenaline filled soldiers and militants whose leader they just killed firing away at each other?

    4) didn't say you did, doesn't mean it doesn't piss me off.

  15. Posted

    Come on, so you really think that the attitude of  'oh the snipers could do it easier' is really a good alternative?

    If they couldn't do it without placing an enourmous risk on innocents, they shouldn't have attempted it at all.

    I'm not saying firing off missiles is the answer but please, a little more thought into comments. Which is easier and risks the fewest Israeli lives?

    So your implying that an Israeli soldier's life is more valuable than an innocent Palestinian's?

    Sending in a group of soldiers who have to infiltrate the area, set themselves up, kill the guy and then sneak out without getting into a contact requiring weeks of planning and risking some of the best soldiers they have to offer?

    or firing off a missile from a few miles away and a few thousand feet up?

    Of course. It's what special forces from all over the world do.

    I'll be honest and say it pisses me off when people say things like that, how many people just went 'Oh they could of just got a few snipers and killed Saddam' a few months ago?

    I sure never said that about Hussein. There is a difference between Saddam Hussein and the leader of Hamas - the Isrealis knew where the leader of Hamas was.

    1) Two killed.

    Bad, but hardly enormous civilian casualties.

    2) To an Israeli Commander?

    Any day of the sodding week.

    3) So, your saying you'd rather an infantry force get into a fight in a crowded street?

    How many do you think would die then? Bullets flying about, adrenaline filled soldiers and militants whose leader they just killed firing away at each other?

    4) didn't say you did, doesn't mean it doesn't piss me off.

  16. Posted

    Come on, so you really think that the attitude of  'oh the snipers could do it easier' is really a good alternative?

    I'm not saying firing off missiles is the answer but please, a little more thought into comments. Which is easier and risks the fewest Israeli lives?

    Sending in a group of soldiers who have to infiltrate the area, set themselves up, kill the guy and then sneak out without getting into a contact requiring weeks of planning and risking some of the best soldiers they have to offer?

    or firing off a missile from a few miles away and a few thousand feet up?

    I'll be honest and say it pisses me off when people say things like that, how many people just went 'Oh they could of just got a few snipers and killed Saddam' a few months ago?

  17. Posted

    Come on, so you really think that the attitude of  'oh the snipers could do it easier' is really a good alternative?

    I'm not saying firing off missiles is the answer but please, a little more thought into comments. Which is easier and risks the fewest Israeli lives?

    Sending in a group of soldiers who have to infiltrate the area, set themselves up, kill the guy and then sneak out without getting into a contact requiring weeks of planning and risking some of the best soldiers they have to offer?

    or firing off a missile from a few miles away and a few thousand feet up?

    I'll be honest and say it pisses me off when people say things like that, how many people just went 'Oh they could of just got a few snipers and killed Saddam' a few months ago?

  19. Posted

    My questions is...why lob seven missiles when they could try and disable the car they were in somehow and use a few well placed snipers. This would prevent all of these tragic incidents of "collateral damage", which has to be a large factor in keeping the war going.

    Both sides are wrong.

    Damn!

    You've just made a breakthough in military tactics!

    I demand you send this to the IDF Immediately.

    Oh wait

    actually how about because of the fact the 'well placed snipers' would be subject to the same ambushes going in and out that has caused a few of these assasinations, as well as the risk of detection while in the hides effectively surronded by people not too friendly to the fact you're trying to kill their political leaders.

  20. Posted

    My questions is...why lob seven missiles when they could try and disable the car they were in somehow and use a few well placed snipers. This would prevent all of these tragic incidents of "collateral damage", which has to be a large factor in keeping the war going.

    Both sides are wrong.

    Damn!

    You've just made a breakthough in military tactics!

    I demand you send this to the IDF Immediately.

    Oh wait

    actually how about because of the fact the 'well placed snipers' would be subject to the same ambushes going in and out that has caused a few of these assasinations, as well as the risk of detection while in the hides effectively surronded by people not too friendly to the fact you're trying to kill their political leaders.

  24. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (PitViper @ 13 May 2003,20:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">found this caption on one of those pages:

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Afterwards. After being made to lie down, each person was shot in the neck at the base of the head. Notice adults shielding their children. During roundups, any Jew unable for any reason not to show up in the market place or designated assembly area was shot onsite. Any Jew found after a roundup action was immediately shot In the beginning, graves were not even dug, natural pits and depressions in the earth were used and the burial detail was left for the locals to handle. Most non-Jewish locals were anti-Semitic to the point that they helped the Germans. Anti-semitism had reached a boiling-point in Europe, and no where was it worse than in Germany, Poland, the Ukraine & Lithuania.<span id='postcolor'>

    Denoir,  I thought you said that anti-semitism was limited to just nazi officials in a few European countries and not in the general population of Europe?<span id='postcolor'>

    I've been trying to think of a resonable reply to this, but they all end up sounding more than a little insulting.

    So, I'll simply say, I disagree strongly.

  25. Posted

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ 13 May 2003,19:23)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Bernadotte @ 13 May 2003,20wow.gif)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (SATAN666 @ 13 May 2003,18:35)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I SWORE I would sit this one out and just continue to lurk as a guest, but I can't help it anymore! I've NOW become a member to throw in my two cents.<span id='postcolor'>

    Let me guess.  You lost a buddy in the war too, huh?

    The only thing I might believe out of you is that you are the former Iraqi information minister.  <!--emo&tounge.gif<span id='postcolor'>

    Although I think that what is said is PMs should remain private, I'll make an exception this time because

    1) syco has been now perm banned and therefor lost all rights on this board

    2) It's just too good not to post

    3) Gives you a picture of how we moderators must deal with troubled teenagers full of hormones and on a crusade against authority

    PM to me from syco/satan666:

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">

    You know what Denoir, you are THE BIGGEST FAKE HERE! I NEVER ONCE insulted ANYONE using SATAN666. You're just mad because I have a point! Thats ok dude...I have SEVEN MORE computers (HERE at home and MANY MORE at work)...so you know what...TRY AND BAN ME FOR LIFE!!! I WILL FIND YOU AND I WILL FUCKING KILL YOU YOU PATHEITC PIECE OF SHIT!!!  I've had it up to HERE with YOU ever since I joined a LONG time ago!!! You've had a PATHEITIC GOD-LIKE atitude and I will ENJOY looking down on you as I smash your face WIDE open! I AM making a trip to Europe and it DOESN'T take me long to find people with my job!!!

    BE WARNED...WATCH YOURSELF...I HAVE MANY SCREENNAMES, and MANY DIFFERENT COMPUTERS! I WILL come from any and ALL DIRECTIONS! Watch WHO you give information too old boy....GodDAMN I'm going to ENJOY THIS!!!

    PS-Just remember, YOU'VE BROUGHT THIS UPON YOURSELF!!! YOU STUPID FUCK!!!!!!! I WILL be the last person you'll ever fuck with!!!To that I SWEAR ON MY ENTIRE FAMILY!! May god have mercy on your pathetic, cowardly, pussy soul, because I WON'T HAVE ANY!!!

    And don't bother responding...I won't read A FUCKINBG THING FROM YOU ANYMORE! CONSIDER ME HAVING THE LAST WORD!!!!! FUCK YOU VERY MUCH PUSSY!

    <span id='postcolor'>

    My God Bernadotte! You are right! It *is* the Iraqi information minister biggrin.gif<span id='postcolor'>

    biggrin.gif

    thats made my day, especially "I'm going on a trip to europe"

    its like, you have paris, walk round the corner and your in berlin, take a bus and you've got stockholm and then over the train tracks and hey presto, your in Pristina smile.gif

×