Jacobss

Things which are bad for me in this movies: - Still no Ragdoll in the Game. This aspect is still not improved since ArmA. I hope only they do this. This game without Ragdoll - Still too many things from ArmA. The cites of Chernarus are still not more improved since ArmA. The Abrams too, the old design of this Tank, which we have seen in ArmA. I can only hope, when this game come out, will be not more of such things. - The animation of getting in to Abrams is still bad. It looks better, but still looks it not realistic. This must be improve. Things which are good for me in this movies: - New vehicels like T-90 or Hind. - Game physic. It looks much better since ArmA, but of course I now, you can't do much in this aspect in such games like ArmA II, but you can do it still better. Positive is that it seems like in old videos from Game 2. I can believe now that ArmA II is in this aspect "truly" Game 2. More important things I can't find in this movies. Well, still no information about version for 360

I think, DX9 will be in ArmA II, becouse the game will be too on 360 and 360 support only DX9. All seems to be good. The best thing, for me is, that you can at least destroy the house with the hole in the wall. Good work, BIS. I'll buy a version for 360.

Well, I see now that the idea to make a topic about ArmA 2 on Xbox 360, was a good idea . Now, I'm thinking about PS3, does BIS make, a version for PS3 too? Suma, can you confirm on which consoles comes ArmA 2? Maruk on GC said only that on X360 would it be for a 100% And what is with PS3?

Well it's not a problem today to release a game with Mouse and Keyboard support. Look at Unreal Tournament III on PS3. This game would have support of the Mouse and the Keyboard. Well, I didin't think about OFP Elite, becouse this game was bad, only becouse was released to late and for old console. 360 comes in November 2005 and OFP Elite too in November on old Xbox 1. This was a bad choice to released this game so late and for such old console at this time like Xbox1. ArmA II would be interesting on X360 becouse such games can you not find on this platform. Mix with FPP, RTS and RPG sound's really as good game. And I now one good game, that have been made on two platforms at the same time, Bioshock. On PC is too so good how in X360. It is possible to make such game. I can now say that in the next year, you would see the big success of ArmA II on X360. Only of course when BIS would find very quick the publisher and the publisher would make a good marketing campaign. I see that even without the mods and addons ArmA II would be success on X360, it's my opinion.

On arma-zone.pl is the new report from GC. New screenshots from Arma II and video from Queens Gambit. The text is in polish, but I think someone would translate it into English. I can't, becouse my english is very bad . In the text are the answers from Maruk and new information about ArmA 2. http://www.arma-zone.pl/modules....pid=120

Well its really hard to venture a guess at how much diffrent the game will be. If the graphics stay the same as they are now, which is on the level of Arma's... then its likely the game won't differ too much. Simply becuase ArmA's graphics, while good given the scale of the environment, aren't really anything special. However I would expect the amount of units on the map at any given time will be lower, and the view distance will probly be considerably lower then the max PC view distance. Other then that any graphical diffrances will likely be minor. Now... personally I think its a terrible idea to make a 360 version. Its at least somewhat possible the PC version might suffer at the hands of a consol version. If the devs wish to just port the game, and not spend a long development time on the 360 version... they might just cut things from the overall game... things like dynamic destruction perhaps. This happened to The Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion as anyone who really followed that games development will know... the devs ended up makeing the game with the 360 version in mind more then the PC version, and cut several features and scaled back the graphics in areas to make it smooth on the 360... problem was they made the same changes to the PC version, which on a good PC would have worked fine. Lets face it... the 360 is 2 years old. It was compared to a high end PC at the time of release. Two years is a long time in PC technology... and a current high end PC is far more advanced then the 360. On the bright side... play ArmA2 while Im away from my PC? Sure thing. Lol. I think you are a PC Fanboy. I see you have no Idea (I mean yet not you, but the other people they writing in this forum about such things like "Arma 2 will be horrible on Xbox 360 or something such things") what BIS would have from Xbox 360 version. Today, from PC games, developers like BIS would not have many money becouse the sellings of this games on PC is horrible. Why? Don't ask me. It is so. The best way to have many money is make a game for consoles. I think the BIS with ArmA 2 would have a very great future on X360. On X360 such games are very very expected. Well, PC with Geforce 8800 GTS 320mb, 2 GB and Dual Core e6600 is only a little better than Xbox 360. I mean with games not specifications. And what I found very bad in this forum is the fact, that when comes ArmA only on PC the people says "yeah this game would rox, and so..." and in the pc magazines and rankings this game I must say "sux"Sorry, I like ArmA but is it only a fact. Now the people are saying like you "this game would be not good on X360" and I think it would be complett different. On PC the Hype would be not so good how on the X360. When BIS found the publisher than with a great marketing campaign the people would see this ArmA 2 and they would buy it. It's my opinion. Ah and Oblivion, was so bad sometimes on X360 becouse they have a little time the devkits. Today, Oblivion on PS3 is so good how in the PC. Well, it is possible to do this, I mean make a game so good how on PC or allmost so good . You would see in the next year that ArmA 2 on X360 would be success.

Well, Maruk at GC said the version on Xbox 360 would be on 100% And as you now, BIS would have from X360 version much more money than from PC Version. It's quite easy to understand that PC version today, would't make much money. But, it's only your opinion but Bis have made in my opinon a very good thing with this annoucing on Xbox 360.

Don't you thing that BIS should at least us say anythings new about Game 2? Are they still working on this game or not? I don't have more patience to still waiting of new information about game 2. Why Maruk doesn't say us, of they still working on this game? Is't very hard to say us some new about it, Maruk (or Suma)?

Yes and no But is possible thath would it be Game 2. ArmA on Xbox 360 would be it definitely not, becouse is it "brand new project from Bohemia" and not a port from ArmA on PC or something other. But, if it is Game 2 than I would see, as if BIS have make all so perfectly how is it in this text: http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Game_2 And I would see how looks the grafics now, how much is better than in 2005 on screenshots in PC games magazine.

I'm from Germany, and I would go in this year to GC. I've ticket to GC and I would try to see Game 2 (or play it) if it would be possible of course. If all this about Game 2 is true, http://community.bistudio.com/wiki/Game_2 than BIS is great and I love the whole BIS

Yeah! Finally we will get info about Game 2 I'm waiting for this game so much long. BIS, If it is Game 2, I love you

So you're saying that 1) BIS has no news 2) BIS should tell us news Am I the only one to see the contradiction there? "Please tell us about the news you don't have". I seem to recall BIS is still busy with ArmA making patches, you're suggesting that they abandon ArmA as-is and go on to something else? Just wondering, that's kinda not making sense... You have don't me understand. I mean, thath BIS have nothings new to tell, but they can us say, WHAT is with this game. I don't expected much infos, screens and so... I would only hear a little of infos, but such things as: They still are working on this game, They say us when we get new info. Such things. BIS hase nothings new ABOUT the game to tell, but about, if they still working and so they can us tell... do you have understand now me?

W0lle sure, I can understood thath BIS have us nothings new to tell, but I thing it's time us somethings new to tell. ArmA is now overall in the World and why BIS don't make a news about game 2 (like, the game is still in development)? It will be better for Community, becouse some people (I to) would heard something new. And about my topic title, you have right. I have to hard it's written. Sorry.

I would like see to new screenshots. On E3 it will be perfect. I hope that BIS can say us more about Game 2 when ArmA is release in USA. I thing that BIS is still working on Game 2. I would like see new physics system, I hope it be better that physics in Crysis.

Neither of those CPUs are good enough to handle a Geforce 8800. They will bottleneck it. I know, but I don't have many money, and I can for 699 Euro PC buying with Athlon Dual Core 2,2 GHZ, 1 GB ram and Geforce 8800 GTS. So, It's better have not good CPU and good graphic card than bad graphic card but good CPU right? Hm, the best solution is have more money? What do you things?

Which PC is better for ArmA? Athlon Dual Core X2 2,2 GHZ with 1 GB ram and Geforce 8800 GTS or Pentium IV 3,2 GHZ with 1 GB and 8800 GTS? How ArmA is running on Geforce 8800 GTS? Or better is buying PC with Directx 9 card also Geforce 7950 GT? I thinging of course only about ArmA. Sorry, for my english becouse I'm a German.