HellToupee
Member-
Content Count
1264 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Medals
Everything posted by HellToupee
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Akira @ Jan. 21 2003,17:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (HellToupee @ Jan. 21 2003,05:13)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">and y so worried about WMDs there has only been one country to use them, and they were used against a civilian population 2 times in a row against a nation that was pretty much already defeated, a nuke attack on the US would show them Nukes dont save lives like they are told.<span id='postcolor'> We've already dealt with that exstensively. Also I pointed out that Germany and England used what are refered to as WMDs in WW1, Mustard Gas in that case.<span id='postcolor'> i dont believe mustard gas was used to destroy cities, if iraq is invaded by the US and they strike the US with nukes to "save" their troops lives thats the same excuses they use for US attacking the jap cities 2 times. Fact is US is only country with a bad record with nuke weapons
-
and y so worried about WMDs there has only been one country to use them, and they were used against a civilian population 2 times in a row against a nation that was pretty much already defeated, a nuke attack on the US would show them Nukes dont save lives like they are told.
-
OMG the USA has more nukes than anybody else, quick men we gota invade, china, north korea, russia, india pakastian all have nukes, i belive 1 % of USA's stock pile is enough to kill us all. One question a country like iraq with little anti missle defence systems that if uses nukes would become nothing but a crater, were as a country like the US developing nuke defence systems is more likly to use them because thy can defend them selfs. There are far more dangrous countries than iraq, iraq isnt even the US's problem iraq has no means to attack the US.
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Lt_Damage @ Jan. 21 2003,15:14)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Since you do not play multiplayer on Gameplanet your opinion is noted, rejected, forgotten. We have plenty of admins who are on at all times of the day.<span id='postcolor'> just never when im on, and no NZ admins.
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (FSPilot @ Jan. 21 2003,15:32)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So he's not in Iraq now?<span id='postcolor'> no he inst his family didnt want him and his brothers to do miltary service, they werer there in the gulf war when the cities got bombed.
-
i have apache on my linux machine, hosted a web site with all my music, it was too much for my 128k connection on adsl and all the hoards of guys on my irc channel i gave the address to, i turned it off
-
i have an iraqi friend and lets just say he dosnt like the US, he dosnt seem them wanting to liberate them, hell their have been worse dictators that no one did anything about, he sees them wanting to take over his contry and put a puppet in charge of it for US benefit, and i agree, all this talk of helping them is Bull shit, army service is compulsary these ppl will be bombed and blown to bits by the US to help them civilians will die infrastructer destroyed, my friend if he stayed in iraq now would be doing miltary service, his mother had to fly back their recently to visit a sick relative.
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (CanVagabond @ Jan. 20 2003,16:04)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Battlezone 2 was a step down in my opinion. Too much terrain screwed up the AI pathfinding, resourcing was bland and unexciting, too easy to turtle up.....I could go on.<span id='postcolor'> yea gameplay took a major hit the graphics were nice, but scavengers system i didnt like, the AI wasnt very good and a few of my fav vechicles took a hit like the bomber, and fighting aliens wasnt as fun as russians(welli used to like being the russians )
-
we always need a voted admin dmg when im on get a few more admins that play alot more, y not make every single one of the wolf boys admins.
-
i sumtimes get these msgs and sumtimes i dont, but im not wasting my time reinstallin i have heaps of addons if usin them gives me the msgs well fuk mp, sps a load better, ai a better at team work and actually do what u say, they can be dum at times but a hell of a lot smarter than sum ppl ive seen play.
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (CanVagabond @ Jan. 20 2003,13:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RalphWiggum @ Jan. 20 2003,18:48)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">as walker said, OFP gives a variety of tools that enable wildest things. CoC is a good example. it incorporates RTS based on a FPS game. now who can claim that with such pride?<span id='postcolor'> Battlezone? Never thought about Tribes being OpFlash's competition though.<span id='postcolor'> yep battlezone would probly be one of the first games to put together the game modes, it was my very first game i played online, was great fun havin a 1v1 buildin up my base and defences and capturing reasources, i would put mine fields around his base and attack with a wave of bombers. Battlezone 2 i never had teh chance to play well before i upgraded and by then i had given it to a friend.
-
but the thing is walker these games get more attention online than ofp because they have much more scale in players, delta force would put u in big maps with big bases and 64 other ppl and little lag even for 56kers playin on the other side of the world like me, i wish i still had df2. OFP has alot of potential, but these stragety type maps offer little to nothing online because they take too long to play, to have a long game u need JIP, ppl leave the game and other people waiting cannont replace them until u end the game. The rts maps r the most fun ive had the AI make up for the lack of players but no one ever wants to play rts its too long ppl want to ither play ctf or cnh two very unorginal game modes. DF2s attack and defend is more orginal.
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (You_looking_at_me? @ Jan. 20 2003,03:05)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I dunno what OFP players have against BF42. It seems to me that lots of the community "hate" it simply becuase its the "done" thing. I know it isnt realistic (although I find its flight model far more realistic) But I find it tremendous fun. The firefights are more intensive and more dynamic than anything Ive yet seen in OFP and legendery moments happen in every game<span id='postcolor'> its flight model i find is less realistic, u cant lose speed in turns only by going up u can, in ofp u put ur plane in a turn it loses speed, the bf42 flight model is less realistic but alot easyer.
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RalphWiggum @ Jan. 19 2003,18:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">VIETCONG: fine but needs some change. if i can go in and get 10 kills as sniper before my first death, it has serious problem to be dealt with nice job with numerous bushes and etc., but hope some bugs(such as when crawling near some bushes make you face upwards) are fixed. nice no brainer FPS with a bit more stuff to make kiddies go nuts.<span id='postcolor'> heh u can do that as sniper in ofp aswell its that easy as sniper, with ofps larger areas endless places to hide. As for FPS being kiddie thats far wrong, many fps's have a very mature audience, my rtcw for example im second youngest at 17 in our squad/group/team clan wat ever with the oldest guy a media designer round 30
-
yea u cant beat deltaforce games online they were sum of the greatest mp games ive played, there were a few cheaters now and again but i didnt run into many, 64 player capture the hill or attack and defend was unmatched.
-
i was in a 15 vs 15 an ahour long game, when it started tthe first 5mins were good i got 3 ppl with my shilta, then it sorta slowed down, still too many objectives for 15 v 15 ofps maps a massive and after 30mins the number of players is almost halfed. Needs to be a smaller verson much much closer together, the rts and cti maps make up for this with ai squads but in them u dont have areas to hold usually.
-
one thing i dont like about it tho is its a little too big, even with a full game it can get pretty slow, usually u find 1 guy defending each base 2 guys attacking and the rest at the airfield or pissin around.
-
u also cant join the game while its being played u mite have to wait a considerable time, most games r short tho ususally 30mins, games longer than that r rare.
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (joltan @ Jan. 14 2003,14:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Harnu @ Jan. 14 2003,01:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yes, I agree there are some dumb people, but still, sometimes they are accidents. If someone TK's you, and you TK them back. Then you're both in trouble. This is just the fancy way of performing a revenge TK.<span id='postcolor'> There should be an option that will just cause a text message like "Bad <name of the TKer>! Baaaaaaad <name of the TKer>!!!"... Something no fatal, for those cases where it was obviously not intentional (like you ran straight into his line of fire).<span id='postcolor'> wat this dose is give ppl punshment for tkin to put them off, i get pissed when ppl tk me, sum ppl r so dum they deserve it, this sounds good because when ever sum one tks in in ofp ild get to deside their fate.
-
there r many just dumb tks tho where they deserve it, i was plyin a map i was on foot was under fire soi run up to one of my tanks a t80, the t80 puts a sabot in my brain after lookin at me for a good while, he said i looked like nme, i was onyl 20m away with a rpg and not shootin him. There rmany dum ppl around, one guy killed me after i stood beside him for about 10 seconds he said i looked like nme.
-
stil tho we lack the computers to run it well, letalone fill it with ai to even take up a small area, and bigger islands for multiplayer r a no no already any map that takes up quater of the island spreads ppl to thin.
-
dang i wish i was there, but currenty my windoze has gone nuts and all sound no longer works i it no matter wat i do tothe drivers or settings, so im stuck in linux where sound works. Just imagine tho with a few good server JIP and stuff sumthing like that could be a regular constant thing, MMORGS have many servers for different ares on a map, biggest game ive been in has been about 30ppl.
-
well i mean we got 1 server total for use really, every other server in the world i ping over 500 to and im on adsl, Australians and NZers just have the one server to share theres about 2-3 squads one of em with a few nzers but they just dont do anything. Also im not into joinin a squad for ofp ild rather lan or just play with my mates i see a sqad in this game as a waste of time ild rather play on pubs, games like rtcw i saw the point of a squad and we even have our own tournmanent ofp needs that sorta popularty.
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Jan. 11 2003,02:06)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The moral of the story is join a squad or team that gets together regularly for practice, in-team coops and cross team matches.<span id='postcolor'> ezer said than done Avon, got about 0 squads in my country 1 server and well just not enough ppl.
-
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Terox @ Jan. 11 2003,23:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">1) Ability to hold more players<span id='postcolor'> already got that, i think if yr servers fast enuff and u have a map capable of it u could probly get as many players as the engine can allow in a map, jus very much doubt anyone has the server or the abilty to get that many ppl on a server.