FSPilot

Don't worry guys. If the president is correct Saddam will get us with his WMDs before any of this happens.

So far they've come up with one mistake that someone made. Not 850, 1. Just because they haven't found the WMDs yet doesn't mean they don't exist. Again, we haven't found Saddam either but nobody's saying he didn't exist.

Or, maybe, they didn't lie and they made an honest mistake.

NurEinMensch You said this A rebel general or terrorist operative does not represent the USA. And no, fallenpaladin, I won't use any sources that I find to be biased. I don't want to listen to the left side, or the right side, I want to hear the truth.

Wow, a whole page directed at me. RalphWiggum Which brings up another one of my points. Why would the white house poke a hole in it's own claims if it were trying to mislead everyone? Anyway most of the sources you've provided don't tell me that the US was spying on UNSCOM or UNMOVIC, they were using them to spy on Iraq. If I understand it correctly. I think the US uses foreign intel all the time. And if the US is blaming their intel sources they are, in effect, blaming themselves. Akira Maybe you should start reading my posts. I never said the US was in shining armor and I never said that I had to be there to witness everything. All I want is a nonbiased source who knows what it's talking about telling me the truth. Not BBC peddling their politics, not Fox news boosting their ratings. tex cha-ching! NurEinMensch Probably because the news isn't interested in anything but Al-Quaeda, especially back then. Either way, show me where my president gave that anthrax to whoever it was using it. Don't show me some renegade general or Al-Queda operative in the army. FallenPaladin Isn't there some kind of rule against flaming? I like to think I have rough skin. But his entire post was about me, not the topic, me. Besides, my rightwing teletubbies are less biased than the world socialism website. Crazysheep Fox news doesn't have any formal accusations of skewing any of it's reports, editing any of it's photos or video tapes, or even only showing one side of the story. Yet you still think it's biased compared to the other news stations that do all that? And you think I'm unreasonable?

If I remember right from watching a documentary, the problem had something to do with the horizontal stabilizer (the flat part of the T on the tail).

Finally we're getting somewhere Akira None of those prove that it was a US military attack ordered by the president, which is what we were talking about. And did you really think I would accept the "World Socialist Website" as unbiased? I thought this was interesting from link 3 Why would the white house poke a hole in the British case on WMDs if they wanted to mislead everyone about it? Anyway, the links you gave suggest things, but don't prove things. I like the way when the US accuses someone of having WMDs you throw a fit over a lack of evidence, but when someone accuses the US of using bad evidence you accept it without any evidence. Why is everyone thinking the US was lying when it's investigating it's own allies?

Well yeah but it's going to gradually get closer. It's not like it'll be huge one day then normal the next. And is it the cosmos or is your avatar changing?

You call that unbiased!? This is a very biased site and the fact that you're trying to pass it off as reliable makes me wonder if I should even be listening to you.

All I've got is a wrinkled and stained wheel-chart from a few years ago. Â This is what I call budget cuts. "Dad, this chart still has the hale-bopp comet on it" "Just ignore it son"

Crazysheep Link? edit - hold on, 2 people somehow managed to post in the 4 seconds it took me to type "Link?" Â Akira Link? (to those who haven't caught on yet, I'm not just going to take your word for it, provide a link) As for the rest of your post, I've seen news on one shred out of the pile of evidence being questioned, that's all. until you provide a link to a non-biased source i'm done talking with you about this. tex I wish I had a dollar every time you made some useless and off-topic post.

you can see mars with your naked eye, so binoculars would do

Yeah, the F-14 was AI. Just saw this at the LOMAC forums http://www.home.no/amraam/ Someone's making movies compiled of release movies, just with really nice music. Kinda makes you cry. Â Â

how do you find out how old a planet is? count it's rings

AHHHH!!! RUN!! My Dad and I will probably dust off the telescope and check it out. This is quite an event.

I'm going to resist the urge pulsating through every fiber of my body to make fun of the French military and their... stellar history. *twitch* I love parades.

NurEinMensch Let me know when you get back from planet tangent. I was nitpicking denoir, trying to make a joke. Uh, no. We know he had them (hell, we gave them to him), we just didn't know where he was keeping them. What? That happened almost a year before this war started. And we still don't know where that stuff came from.

I could probably stay awake for that long. Marching all that distance? Well, I'm not a marine.

RalphWiggum That's heresay too. One shred of the piles of evidence the US put forth has been brought into question. All of it was not false. Source? If I remember right it was Iraq that bugged the inspector's rooms and generally got in their way a lot. Give them 12 years. Tamme I think he was referring to Iraq.

turms I didn't say it was a smoking gun. denoir As far as we knew he was a clear and present danger. If he did destroy them I don't think he would of done it in secret. I doubt the US would use chemical or nuclear weapons on our own soil. Personal opinion, I hope it'll never come up. I disagree. It was never a threat that Saddam would use them in a force on force war with the US. Everyone knows we would shoot back with chemicals and he would lose. The threat was that they would be handed to a terrorist, which could easilly be the explanation.

Yeah but... uh, it's hot out and there's that west nile disease going around. I'm a marathon car driver. I drove a car at 20mph for around 3 hours for a bike race.

They land and build airfields for the air force. *runs* I've got nothing but respect for the marine corps. They're the first in line and they worked hard to get there.

I'd have to look at the individual vehicles to determine that. I'm just saying what I saw on the news.

I'm not military/ex-military, and the only way you'd get me to walk that far is if there was some sort of candy-dispensing machine at the end of the race. Seriously though I've always wanted to do a marathon. One that doesn't involve seeing how long I can play a game I mean.

Yes, I think we should start getting rid of genocidal rulers, but no I don't think we should waste American lives doing it. I wan't to have my cake, eat it, and have it be low fat. To be fair, I don't think the BBC, LA times, or new york times count seeing what they've done. Until someone proves Fox news to be maliciously altering the content of their broadcasts they're trustworthy. FallenPaladin Denoir already posted a link to this. booradley60 denoir The UN has been looking for these weapons since the end of the last gulf war. Actually an Iraqi scientist did come forward with components of Iraq's nuclear program that he, literally, buried in his backyard. They have found some vehicles that could only be used for a WMD program. Â Didn't you see the illustrations? or that he ordered them to be moved or destroyed before he could use them I think if it was deception someone would of come forward with information about it. Â So it was probably incompetence. Â The CIA's not exactly the best intelligence agency out there anymore.