FSPilot

How so? Finesse and George W. Bush don't go well together.

I understand that we simply have a difference of opinion, but I think they'd be rushing into war too if their balls were on the wire like this.

So tell them you're hunting the targets next time The biggest piece of artillery we have would be a .50 cal muzzleloader. Â It packs a punch but you'd better hit what you're aiming at, it takes a while to reload. I love shooting our .30-06 springfield. Â It's vintage world war two and I'm hoping to get a scope on it so we can hunt with it better. ... ok, and so I can pretend to be the religious guy from saving private ryan. Â

I guess you didn't see when he banned someone for racist remarks against Americans.

This is getting stupid now. Â Bush didn't do anything, yet you're saying he won't stop. Â Get off his case, he's just trying to protect his country.

My Dad and I are going to the rifle range soon to scope in our rifles for the hunting season. Probably wont take any pics though. I will have a pic posted soon of me posing with that AK-47 Beta I used for airsoft a while back. That is, if the mods don't mind me ressurecting an old thread.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Better yet why don't you research it...<span id='postcolor'> Nope, that's your job. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I told you I have not looked into it, and I am not saying it is absolutely true, I give my info usually without sources, which is funny, because the U.S. claims it can not reveal it's info because it's sources will be revealed...<span id='postcolor'> Don't tell me I have to explain what the term "top secret" means to someone with Albert Einstein for their avatar. The U.S. isn't revealing their sources because if they do, their undercover </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">(actually now I remember, I saw that on an interview with some high ranking Iraqi official, not long ago. research it)<span id='postcolor'> Again, your job. *high fives denoir* Thank you.

Airsoft? lol j/k

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bn880 @ Dec. 12 2002,07:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Okay, I have not looked into this, but Iraqi officials once stated that they handed out guns to "all" their citizens. Â If they did, surely they can't be opressing everyone like that. EDIT: I was talking about a civilian uprising once the pressure on Iraqi forces is overwhelming... Â so if so many were opressed, then the war should resolve itself within 3-6 weeks as that is when Iraqi forces should be heavily strained...<span id='postcolor'> Well, first off, Iraqi officials are usually not to be trusted. That being said I'd like to see your source on that. The officials probably got confused with Saddam's recruitment efforts (forcing everyone into their army). I'm talking about an Iraqi uprising before we got involved, or after if we don't remove Saddam from power. Maybe we're arguing with each other about different things, lol.

It will definately compete with OFP. Especially if it has the first person view. Even more so if they advertise a lot, even if they don't have the first person view.

... and? You're going to give us an example right? lol kinda left us hanging there.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bn880 @ Dec. 12 2002,05:55)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"><span id='postcolor'> </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Like I said, if they are opressed like that then they will attempt to fight back. There would be a civil war if they were holding their breath for this long.<span id='postcolor'> Or they would sit on their hands waiting for us to do something because they're afraid of being slaughtered again. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">If they do not, then I guess the US should stay away from there because the Iraqis don't want their help.<span id='postcolor'> The U.S. might take Saddam out for more than one reason. This isn't all about the Iraqi people. Even if they don't want us to liberate them we'd still do it if he posed a threat. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">It will be nearly impossible to find out the truth from the media once things start rolling though....<span id='postcolor'> For once I agree with you. </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">If you call such an uprising for a civil war then clearly you have no clue what you are talking about.<span id='postcolor'> Quit nitpicking my choice of words. What difference does it make if it were a rebellion or a civil war or an uprising? None. They tried to overthrow Saddam, they got slaughtered.

I'll probably pick it up if Col.Kurtz is on target.

Right at the end of desert storm the U.S. told the Iraqis to rise up against Saddam. They thought they would have U.S. support against Saddam's armys, so they did. But the civilians ended up getting slaughtered by the army. We couldn't do anything because we had just signed the cease fire, but they wanted Saddam out of power and tried.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (bn880 @ Dec. 11 2002,09:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">If the majority of Iraqis are being opressed like that, and would like to have Hussein removed, then the fight will resolve itself within 3-6 weeks with a civil war. Â <span id='postcolor'> Do I have to remind you what kind of a civil war they had back in the 90's without the U.S. support? I highly doubt they'd attempt that again.

Interesting survey, but I'm always weary of these things. I don't know how they were done so it might not be very reliable.

Balschoiw, you've been at this forum for almost a year now.  You should know not to start these blatantly anti-U.S. threads.  The trick is to start one about something the U.S. has done in the past, and then watch as it develops into an anti-U.S. thread in a few pages. This should be closed. edit - if the U.S. were attacked by any form of a WMD, I would be behind a similar response.  Why?  Because we have the right to defend ourselves like anybody else.

no first person view = crappy game at least IMO if i want to play an arcade game I'd go to the arcade -_-

Oh PLEASE. Give me a MiG-29 and I'll wipe the floor with you.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Hovmand @ Dec. 11 2002,08:10)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Nicolas Cage is going to be starring as Superman <span id='postcolor'> *vomits* Nicholas Cage!?!?!?!?!

I'll definately see that. Indiana Jones is great. So it James Bond.

I've got a pentium now, works great.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Akira @ Dec. 11 2002,04:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Dec. 10 2002,23:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">More probably Ceausescu (Romania). He wasn't dragged in the streeets, but he was executed in a hurry by a firing squad.<span id='postcolor'> Hmmm...maybe that was him... *scratching head*<span id='postcolor'> Mussolini?

Good enough.

Is it me or is this way too offtopic for offtopic?