Eviscerator

The Wessex is a version with turbine engines instead of piston engines, i know there used to be a few flying out of the army base in Dhekelia, Cyprus, mainly because i saw them although i left in the middle of 2000 and they were still flying, no idea if they are still active

That is not the BAS CH-53E, Col Klink is making ours, the one in that screenshot is scorpios, there are no shots of ours yet, there wont be till its nearly finished, its looking very good though also that pic is 178kb, you might want to change it to a url before you get told off...

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ZLOY @ Jan. 27 2003,14:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Jan. 27 2003,14:54)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Unatomber @ Jan. 27 2003,15:48)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Jan. 27 2003,14:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Sorry if I missed it, DKM folks, but will you be developing a counterweight helicopter for the Soviets, like the MI-28 Havoc and the KA-50/52 Hokum?<span id='postcolor'> Excuse me, but the V-80 ingame is KA-50. V-80 was the project-name of the KA-50 chopper. The Havoc would be nice though.<span id='postcolor'> That's why I mentioned the KA-52. <span id='postcolor'> Isnt it a KA50-2? Â <span id='postcolor'> no, the KA-50-2 Erdogan is an Israeli/Russian bid for Turkeys new helicopters

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ZLOY @ Jan. 27 2003,13:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">ey Evis, is there gonna be an M240b/g in your  Delta addon ??  <span id='postcolor'> no, deltas are cqb/bodyguard/assasination troops no need for a 7.62 mg, the rangers use it, not sure it will make it to release though, if not it will be added with future versions, the deltas use the M249 (which will most likely be switched to the M249 SPW)

it still loaded all the ofp/res/addons, although i suppose it could have been because it was using a shortcut of resistance (copied my dynamic range stuff and used it as a template, changed names/overwrote the addons folder etc), i dont have the time to do it again, but if you want an ofp with no ofp/addons folder you would need to install 1.00 then 1.75 then 1.91

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Jan. 27 2003,11:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Eviscerator @ Jan. 27 2003,12:21)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">hmmm didnt work, nevermind i used the cheat from your faq to go on to the next one <span id='postcolor'> What didn't work? Suggestion 1? 2? Both? No matter what, it crashed? Did you try suggestion 2 and manually define an Addons folder? Did OFP at least know to load addons in there?<span id='postcolor'> yep tried both

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ZLOY @ Jan. 27 2003,12:03)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (USMC Sniper @ Jan. 27 2003,04:50 )</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yes and I'll be making the M16A4 (That's what they use now, right?) and the M60E3, as well as compiling some stuff.<span id='postcolor'> Dont make an M60E3, cause neither Army nor Marines are using it........Better retexture that FN Mag that Crielaard've made to look like an M240 Â <span id='postcolor'> well....the M240B looks a lot different to the FN MAG, mainly due to the handguard: If you're doing the marines then its the M240G, which looks a little more like the FN MAG cam0flage: me too, it was tigersharks on the bas internal forums, theres another one too:

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Jan. 27 2003,10:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">6--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Eviscerator @ Jan. 27 2003,116)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">its in res/addons, i dont have an ofp/addons<span id='postcolor'> Naughty! Naughty! Search The FAQ for "unofficial addons". Suggestions: 1. Move everything you need for Vietnam missions to a Vietnam -mod addons folder and create a desktop shortcut that references the mod folders. 2. Test this out and tell us if it works: Manually define an Addons folder and see if OFP recognizes addons that are in it. Keep us posted. I can't do this because my install includes the old Addons folder.<span id='postcolor'> hmmm didnt work, nevermind i used the cheat from your faq to go on to the next one

its in res/addons, i dont have an ofp/addons

the mission 'Ethics' crashes me to desktop when i finish the mission before it and it tries to load it, not sure if this is only with the new version or not

actually, from talking to a source inside the US Army i believe they dont/wont be using the M16A3/4, which only difference from the M16A2 is that it has a flat top receiver for mounting optics, and one of them has full auto instead of burst, near enough the whole us army is switching to the M4 series, its just as accurate as the M16A2 and can have varius optics mounted on it easily and its good for FIBUA/CQB, so the M16A2 and M4 would probably be better than an M16A3/4

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ExtracTioN @ Jan. 25 2003,02:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">BAS team is making Seals and the weapons of the seals has a NV scope and geus what it works <span id='postcolor'> no it doesnt

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Guttersnipe @ Jan. 27 2003,02:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So many, even us lippy Brit's need a BIGGER ship plse..<span id='postcolor'> will this do? A couple of concept pictures of the Royal Navy's new aircraft carriers, the CVF

cant be, gerbils have tails: hamsters have a tiny stubby thing:

why did you only use tiny pics?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">While we're on the subject, do you have a *rough* eta as to when BAS' RAH-66 might be released?<span id='postcolor'> erm, no, i actually dont really know much about the project, Bishop doesnt show much of his progress, i suppose either he or deadmeat would be best to answer this and yes, its a different one to brsseb

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (ExtracTioN @ Jan. 26 2003,01:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I only pay for IL or OFP2 MOD's are good but MOD's are not ment to be sold if you look at other games mod's all are free <span id='postcolor'> cs?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (joltan @ Jan. 26 2003,00:33)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (FSPilot @ Jan. 25 2003,21:31)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Took 8 RPG-2s to destroy both the SEB T-54 and Ash's T-55G. I used RPG-2s so the results would be more accurate. Â It took 2 laws to destroy them both. my conclusion: they're both equally tough<span id='postcolor'> Ok, I did a 4-on-4 with the SEB tanks - the T54 won 10 of 10 (all highest skill flat terrain on desert island). The Us tanks always fired first - and missed. They are extremely bad shots! Thats why they get killed so easily - the fight and may be armoured as their opponents, but they miss too often. I'd rather call that a bug in the SEB 2.0 pack than a problem with the SEB T-54.<span id='postcolor'> i did the same a few days ago and got: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> just did a quick test on flat land with the M48A3's vs T-54's, the outcome was 3 T-54's destroyed, one badly damaged, 2 M48A3's destroyed, one badly damaged<span id='postcolor'> and: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">just tried 4 BIS M60's versus 4 T-54's and all M60's were destroyed for one T-54 loss <span id='postcolor'>

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Miles Teg @ Jan. 25 2003,16:33)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (FerretFangs @ Jan. 25 2003,05:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Thanks for that clip. For the record I was wrong, the XM301 cannon only fires at a maximum rate of 1500SPM. It starts at 750SPM and rev's up to 1500SPM, in several seconds. This should sound more like a loud ripping sound, rather than a solid buzz, anyway. I have heard some fantastic sound effects for aircraft gun's like G8's Tornados, and just feel that DKM could have done slightly better in this regard. And for the record, I'm not being rude or harsh, here. Just offering some constructive criticism, for the benefit of all. And for those people that think the gun is too powerful, here's a site that should help: http://www.aircav.com/cobra/ammo20.html.<span id='postcolor'> The correct URL is: Â http://www.aircav.com/cobra/ammo20.html You left a period in the URL (at the end) which takes it to some web hosting page. Chris G. aka-Miles Teg<GD><span id='postcolor'> not too sure how that proved the gun is powerful FerretFangs, unless you are trying to prove its weak... its saying it can only destroy a few very lightly armoured vehicles, it definately shouldnt be able to destroy a T80 in a few seconds when the T80 will probably have 15x-25x the armour of say the bmp(i dont actually know the real figure)

i have seen it happen once, but i was playing mp so i put it down to lag, ST is going through all the nam pack models and making sure they dont have anything different from the stock BIS models (and there are over 100 custom models in the pack...), there should be a bug fix once hes finished

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (CuteQA @ Jan. 25 2003,19:43)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (blackdog~ @ Jan. 24 2003,10:41)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"><span id='postcolor'> hmm...........A must have mouse picture! <span id='postcolor'> isnt that a hamster? it has no tail, or a very small stubby one

i think skids should be able to do just that, skid, it is possible to do running take offs with skids, in the vietnam war the UH-1C had so little engine power and weighed so much (6 tonnes, compared to 3 for a slick) that they had to taxi and bounce the helo up and down to get enough height to stay in the air, i guess wheels are there to A: make it aerodynamic when they are raised and B: protect with landings as obviously a skid cant have much suspension and probably just snaps, although i dont think taxiing is possible in ofp in helos, as i believe real helicopters use the collective to get forward/reverse speed (as well as tilting forwards), but we have no such control in ofp, it would be good if they could be used to land though, also if they made it so that helos dont explode with every crash it would be better, so if you came in a little hot it would say break the wheels (like on planes) and maybe smash the windows a bit

i know what you mean, its hard to find a place where the HE/exploding tanks cant get you, but im passed it now so not too worried about it anymore

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Miles Teg @ Jan. 25 2003,04:06)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">What kind of flares were you using? Â The flares that fire from the grenade launchers or actual working flares? Â What Evi is talking about (Evi correct me if I'm mistaken) is the flare system created by Colorchanger for his Tornado fighter-bomber addon (part of the G8 mod). Â This flare system actually works against missiles. Â Putting regular flares that dropped from a helicopter would just be eye candy and not do anything...plus they'd only visible at night. Â Colorchanger's flares in contrast are visible during the daytime and they actually stop missiles most of the time. Â If you created independently such a system you should have released it with some kind of addon and taken credit for it. Â At any rate, if you haven't seen colorchanger's flare system in action, you should check out the G8 Tornado. Â The way it works isn't all that realistic, but it works well (too well sometimes) so I'm not complaining. Â I just hope that future aircraft will slow down the rate of fire for the flares so that way it gives AA missiles a greater chance of destroying the aircraft. Chris G. aka-Miles Teg<GD><span id='postcolor'> nope your not mistaken, ours work a lot like that, but it is more automatic, you dont have to fire them off for it to work, they are automatic so you can fire the M134 while flares drop

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Miles Teg @ Jan. 24 2003,14:49)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (~Too Tall~ @ Jan. 23 2003,18:33)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">flares? Â Â weeee someone actualy took my suggestion. . .no offense BAS im not tryin to be a smart ass. .its jstu ur the first addon makers to take my suggestion (not counting hudson) <span id='postcolor'> Actually a lot of us have been asking for flares since the MH-47E first was released. Chris G. aka-Miles Teg<GD><span id='postcolor'> and the team was discussing them before that, we just didnt have a chance to implement them, i cant actually remember you suggesting them to us ~Too Tall~, and such a popular thing as flares would be hard to stake a claim to the idea of them