Cobra84

We have 3 games with M16s, M1s, and AH-64s. It's time to do something else.

I only have any trouble hitting moving targets, so the lock on works or me. I can hit a inactive or stationary target with near 100% accuracy the a MK-82. All A-10As will be upgraded to A-10Cs by the end of this year. OA takes place in 2012, so there will not be any A-10As left.

I do find the GBU-12s to be too much work for little payoff. MK-82s can be extremely accurate with a bit of practice and even guided with a lock-on (why?). Why rely on someone else when I do it myself just as easily? The GBU-12s aren't very loadout friendly either. The AV-8 loses 2 AIM-9s and 2 rocket pods just to carry the same weight in GBU-12s as MK-82s. The A-10 could really use an 8 Mk-82 loadout option instead of the 4 GBU-12s.

One line fixes are always the hardest to get fixed in any game. I'd be a millionaire if I got a dollar for every simple one line fix not fixed in patches. I think there are still one line fixes not fixed in the IL-2 game series nearly ten years after the initial release.

What's wrong with an E8600? Its faster than what 90% of us probably have and probably not too far from a low end quad core, unless the game in very efficient when using 4 cores (most aren't).

Roles need filled, the Hind fills the Attack and Transport roles for the other side. A Challenger 2 is pointless as its role is completely filled by the M1A2. There are minimal differences between the two tanks, with the advantages going to the M1A2.