Banderas

I urgently request an USMC reskin for this beauty http://forums.bistudio.com/showthread.php?t=100778

Nice NZX. Just a poetical question, will that FBCB2 be partially or fully functional ? :)

Man, I wish you good luck with this, it needs a helluvalotof ambitions to make it. Hope to have some full-scale war in the area in time :)

No question is stupid from a beginner :) You can find the profile file in your C:\Documents&settings\"yourprofile"\Documents\Arma 2 directory (*.Arma2profile), editing can be done with notepad (or press "F4" in wincmd/tc)

For default it's the "task" button between the right "Alt" and "Ctrl" buttons.

Thank you guys, I just didn't ever get to use this "self-interaction menu", until now I didn't know this exists, thus I didn't know what was changed...:j: now I figured out what is that, thanks again.

Until now, I wasn't. Look at me as a stupid, but what does that mean? How do I put them on, with assigned keys? No, it doesn't work for me since last update, guess above thing is the solution.

So anyone else having the same case that nevertheless of this is set, one can't put in earplugs, put on glasses, balaclavas, ect...? Or any conflicting addon?

Due to the close release of OA, I think we can request some reskins for the upcoming vehicles, I was thinking about these: reskin for CDF: -BTR-60; -T-55; -M113; -UH-1H; -An-2; -Humvee Reskin for ChDKZ: -BTR-40; -BTR-60; -T-55; -9P117 SCUD; -An-2 (?) Reskin for NAPA: -BTR-40; -T-55 Reskin for Russia: -BTR-60; -T-55; -9P117 SCUD Civilian: -An-2 airliner, agricultural "worm-bomber" -UH-1H

Can some people give me some ideas or feedbacks, how do they set up the different wounding & surrender/fleeing/capturing systems for AI in SP/coop missions? And how do the different systems (vanilla, ACE, GL4, SLX) responding to each other? Currently I've set up vanilla and ACE modules, not too much problems so far, except when I give first aid for an AI teammate, then our AI medic just forgets to heal him up.

I'm one that not a maniac for the hyper-über-superlative tier 1.007 special-beret-green-operative-operator-seal-ranger-forces-boiler-makers-and-gynaecologists, but how does it come that nobody of them delta-fanboys requested their awesome-dragon-slayer waterride, the Special Operations Craft-Riverine? And an Mk46 for those underequipped poor fellows

At last! Great, going to check out right now :)

Sorry but I don't get this, you want Spetsnaz in Multicam camo?:confused:

I think it's from SLX mod buddy.

Well it wasn't a suggestion, merely a question. And no offense, but I'd like to know what the mod's developers have to say about it. As AxF Fox pointed out, in RL you can hardly look through an iron sight, aimpoint or scope with a helmet (head) mounted NVG, that's why modern armies use infrared laser-aiming devices. Or an NV sight. Although I agree that they would be good only if helmet NVGs were to shut off when aiming down the sight

With the coming of OA, thermal weapon sights will be available on small arms. Although they probably will be nice additions, I have a feeling that "normal" night vision optics are more common to encounter. I'd like to ask if there is a future intention to make night vision sights like AN/PVS-17, AN/PVS-14 or AN/PVS-10 SNS available? Like Vilas done some working NV sights for his east weapon pack already.

@Myke What a fast notification. Thanks for the very quick work. you're The MAN :)

I request the porting of the UH-60 wreck from ArmA 1

Agree with that, I just hope in time there will be maps big enough so these ranges can be used properly (unluckily a few years of advancement in PC technology is required).

Well considering that right now we hardly have any map bigger than 10x10 km, I think for gameplay purposes its better we're not having the full range of that weapon (also not the 28km for AGM-65, 8km for AGM-114 - you could supress a whole map with a single Apache :))

Problem is that the sounds are a bit distant as the vid is shooted from inside a Humvee.

I know very well he doesn't do that, but the area that is now available for the airport is still too small for two runways. Either they'd be too close to each other or there won't be too much space for the other airport installations - aprons, taxiways, hangars, terminal, control tower, freight warehouses, you name it. Either the area needs to be enlarged or the airport will be very much overcrowded.

Hey Mardigan! I've conducted some test landings, takeoffs and taxiing on the area of "Everon Intl. Airport", and I don't think there is enough place for two runways, either they would be too narrow or there won't be enough space between them. If you and others agree, I think to have a not too confined airport, there should be one runway on the place of the eastern runway-taxiway, and one taxiway and the aprons, ramps, terminal, hangars, ect. to the west of it. Also to the North the airport, the hill is a little dangerous for the landings, forcing the pilot to make a high angled approach from that direction. Is it possible to flatten that hill a bit for safer landings?

Not necessarily, depends on the area, for example in Africa you can see Asian countries (India, Pakistan) with own made and local countries with mostly French/Belgian/British equipment. In Haiti, I believe there are mostly Brazilian smurfs. Also there are a lot of Western European Blue Helmet units out there, there's a lot of variety, but I agree that USMC is not the best basic for them UN peacekeepers.

Here you go ;) http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=8890