BaronVonRed

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Sh@d0w_Killer @ Nov. 26 2002,16:19)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I use the 3509.1.00 driver's and it's been working great.Will try to post a link for you for these..<span id='postcolor'> Thank you for that. I will try turning off acceleration in Direct X first, then will resort to driver hunt (I may have them on a "master CD". Of course, it is still possible that A) SB will respond to my trouble request, and B) they will actually fix it ........ and it is also possible for pigs to fly if only they had wings

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (joltan @ Nov. 26 2002,16:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">If you buy it out of the box then it may be ok if you only get one cd with all the drivers - but if you let them custom build it for you they should give you all that came with the hardware. You pay for the parts!<span id='postcolor'> I don't think they were there, but then again, I was so excited when it came in, I may have left them in the bottom of the box (in which case they are in the landfill) Wait....I do have a "Master CD" and a separate O/S CD. I wonder if they could be on the "Master CD"? I will look when I get home.

"2: Target Soundblaster Card: 3 5" "1 (BaronVonRed): Sabot" ~pause "1 (BaronVonRed): FIRE" ...loud explosion... "2: Soundblaster Card is history" "1 (BaronVonRed): Negative" "1 (BaronVonRed): Driver, goto 3 5" .......CRUNCH...... ...three hours later..... "1 (BaronVonRed): FORWARD - STOP" "1 (BaronVonRed): REVERSE - STOP" "1(BaronVonRed): FORWARD - STOP" .............

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Sh@d0w_Killer @ Nov. 26 2002,15:59)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I also have a Soundblaster Live 5.1 mp3/gammer and had the same problem. What worked for me was to roll back the driver's to some older one's, but the real fix was to go into the DirectX trouble shooting section in you system info on your pc and turn down the directX sound acceleration to off! Since doing that all the horrible sound when in vehicles went away! <span id='postcolor'> I did not see this solution posted in this way in any of the other (previous) threads about this. I saw where some said to turn the acceleration off within OFP that seemed to work for some and not for others. I DID see where some said to roll back the drivers to older ones, and this seemed to work for some until either they upgraded to XP or Resistance or both. I wonder if the older drivers are available on the website? I don't have my originals, and since THE COMPUTER was a custom job, I don't have the SB CD. I will try what you said and if it works, I will press your name into a bronzed plaque and hang it on the wall above my computer! ( Still, though, even if it DOES work, we need to hound SB to fix this so that we can have our sound acceleration ON )

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Kegetys @ Nov. 26 2002,15:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (BaronVonRed @ Nov. 26 2002,16:35)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I wish it was that easy - it's an Area-51 Alienware box, custom built.<span id='postcolor'> Your soundcard is custom built? <span id='postcolor'> Uh yeah, Alienware custom built me my own soundcard OF COURSE it isn't custom built. The computer is custom built by them, thus I do not have a receipt for just the soundcard. How do I negotiate the refund with Alienware? And besides (and please include this with your NEXT sarcastic remark) : HOW DOES GETTING ANOTHER CARD HELP FUTURE USERS AVOID THIS PROBLEM? And perhaps it would help if you told me exactly which card I need to buy? Yes, if I cannot resolve it with CL, then I will have little choice but to buy some other card and hope that works.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Kegetys @ Nov. 26 2002,15:29)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (BaronVonRed @ Nov. 26 2002,16:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">if we all contact Creative Labs, then maybe we will get their attention - what other choice do we have?<span id='postcolor'> Get some other soundcard? If your card still has warranty, take it back to where you bought it and get some other one.<span id='postcolor'> I wish it was that easy - it's an Area-51 Alienware box, custom built. What's worse is that after reading all the other posts about this, it isn't exactly clear which soundcard would actually do it for Win-XP - some say this one, others say that one doesn't work. Besides, having CL fix it helps future users of the game, whereas buying another card helps them not unless they check this forum before buying the game and/or a new computer, which I doubt most will do.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (theavonlady @ Nov. 26 2002,15:27)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (BaronVonRed @ Nov. 26 2002,16:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">if we all contact Creative Labs, then maybe we will get their attention - what other choice do we have?<span id='postcolor'> Class action lawsuit. I'm not kidding.<span id='postcolor'> Man I wish I could - do you have any idea what this does to the "immersion factor"? GEEZE - and this is the only game I play! Heh, heh, we should be able to sue them because the device is not doing what it SAYS it will do but nobody seems to be able to help us! I just wish and hope that others will fall-in and rally against Creative Labs so maybe they will fix it!!!!!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Kegetys @ Feb. 11 2002,11:28)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Or you can just do triggers for all the soldiers with "not alive unitname" in the condition, and "removeallweapons unitname;unitname addmagazine "steyrmag";unitname addweapon "steyr";" and set the countdown time to the respawn time. Where you of course replace all "unitname"´s with actual names of the units. Also set it to repeating so it will work more than once.<span id='postcolor'> That's how I do mine, but I never made one with more than 10 players. Point is, it's fast and reliable. I usually put the activation of the trigger to a weapons script.

Urban warefare, bleh! (Remember Samalia, aka Blackhawk Down)....better make sure you're prepared!

So if I had just said that I'd won points #1 and #5, that would have been sufficient?

Well, at least I seem to have backing now for numbers 1 and 5 of my origianl post that got everyone's panties all wadded (not posting, keeping score)... Women do not make good COMBAT soldiers for several reasons: 1) They are physically inferior, 2) They have monthly hormone impacting cycles that affect their readiness, 3) They (in general) do not posses the natural instinct to kill as a male does, 4) They can be physically impregnated by the enemy, 5) They can cause inter-personal issues within a group (not really their fault), 6) It is the male instinct to protect them, which could cause judgement issues.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (E6Hotel @ Nov. 22 2002,20:35)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">It's not punishment, it's putting the needs of the unit ahead of the needs of the individual. About equal standards, there are two options here: (A) Hold all to male standards -- Many highly competent females currently serving would be forced out. (B) Hold all to female standards -- You will end up with a lot of dead grunts. Semper Fi<span id='postcolor'> FINALLY, some backup! Note: not a "post" really, just pointing something out.

I keep trying to stop reading this thread because I am obviously outnumbered and defending a position that I just cannot hold against these odds, but I can't STOP Ok, I'm stopping now, but only after this comment and this is all, I'm not reading this thread anymore My last and I really mean it this time, my last comment on this thread: I sincerely hope that all enemies of the U.S. subscribe to allowing women on the battlefield and in the bush; it will just make our job all the easier when/if (but probably when) the time comes. So yes, fill up your troops with women, and make sure to have plenty of them on sentry duty when the Deadly Recon comes a knockin'.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ Nov. 22 2002,18:36)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">9--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (E6Hotel @ Nov. 22 2002,189)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">WM's (Women Marines) can serve in any MOS except infantry, armor, or artillery. They fly Hornets and Super Cobras, and can serve as helo crew chiefs (where they would also serve as door gunners). So why don't we let 'em in combat arms fields? After all, some women are physically fit enough. It's because the USMC doesn't NEED them in combat arms. Women in combat units is the solution to a non-existent problem. From a personal perspective: Since laterally moving from the infantry I have met, lived with (barracks), worked with, and even worked for many WM's. (Dated one too -- but enough about that. ) Not one ever expressed a desire to be a grunt. We have a similar situation with our aviators. Some of the services allow pilots to have corrected vision. We don't. Is it discriminatory? Heck no. It's just that we have an ample supply of officers with 20/20, so we don't have to relax standards. Semper Fi<span id='postcolor'> Excellent reply E6! I have to admit that I wasnt aware that the Marines employed women in aviation roles that might lead to combat. I think that sort of casts Barons assertion that there arent any women in the US Marines into doubt. Sounds like BaronVonRed is a closet misogynist.<span id='postcolor'> I expected better from a MODERATOR, but I'll just add that name to the growing stack. A REAL mature move. What are you, twelve? Besides, I said a LONG time ago that I LOVE women, just not in combat. Oh, and by the way: In spring 1991, in the wake of Desert Storm, Colorado Rep. Pat Schroeder introduced a bill to repeal the prohibition against women flying combat missions. While that bill was pending, sexual misbehavior at the annual Tailhook gathering of naval aviators developed into a scandal. The bill passed, allowing women to fly combat missions, and the navy soon began allowing women on combatant ships. In another controversial move, "co-ed" basic training began in 1994. Opponents argue that in basic training and throughout the military, female recruits are held to lower physical standards than men -- or that standards for both have been weakened to allow women to pass. "The services are always looking at physical fitness standards. The standards between men and women are different," says Lt. Col. Susan Kolb, spokesperson for the Defense Advisory Committee On Women In The Services (DACOWITS).

* 1996: Twelve soldiers at Maryland's Aberdeen Proving Ground were accused of abusing female recruits; Staff Sgt. Delmar Simpson, a drill instructor, was convicted of six counts of rape. * 1997: Lt. Kelly Flinn, the first woman to pilot a B-52 bomber, was discharged from the Air Force after having an affair with a married civilian and continuing the affair after being ordered to end it. * 1997: Gene McKinney, the most senior enlisted man in the Army, was court-martialed for sexual harassment and obstruction of justice. Acquitted of the harassment charges but convicted of obstruction, he was dropped in rank and reprimanded. * 1999: Command Sgt. Major Riley Miller, the Army's most senior enlisted man in Europe, was accused of sexually assaulting a female subordinate. * 2000: Maj. Gen. Larry G. Smith was accused of sexual harassment by the highest-ranking woman in Army history, Lt. Gen. Claudia Kennedy. Smith was being considered to head the inspector-general's office; in that post, he would have been responsible for investigating harassment claims.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Balschoiw @ Nov. 22 2002,16:01)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">So ? I really DID explain why women and man are equally used in military nowadays. I have military experience in that and I guess many others were able to follow my posts here. Why do you take part in a discussion if you feel to ignore others ? Better talk to your TV set then. I am really sorry, but the only one that is a bit off here is you. Totally. If you cant separate facts from personal meanings it´s not my problem. But even the blindest reader should see that you stand pretty alone with your chauvinistic, sexist, teenage thinking. Answer the question you have been asked many times now: Have you been to army and have you coworked with the women you tend to discriminate here ? Have you ? It´s you that insults people not me. And whining seems to be your favour, not mine. I am grown up.<span id='postcolor'> Call me all the names you want cause I could care less what YOUR opinion of me is and no matter how many names you come up with for me, it still ain't gonna change the facts, and the big fact that remains is that women don't make good combat soldiers. And why are you so concerned with my military background? Is it because you SAY you have one? Does that make it a FACT? And saying that makes you feel special? Like only YOU now have a say? I can talk all about my 10 years as a U.S. Marine and my 9+ years as a Navy SEAL, where I was wounded and unable to return to combat, and my current post, which I CAN'T tell you about (I'm 40 years old - you do the math), but what would be the point? Saying it doesn't make it so. I can SAY anything I want just like you can SAY anything YOU want, but why bother, you're just going to revert to more name-calling anyway no matter what I say.... Question for YOU Mr. Military man: Have YOU ever seen a U.S. Marine up close and personal? This is my last post on this issue. Too many people with bleedin' hearts and no grasp of reality.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Shadow @ Nov. 22 2002,15:58)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (BaronVonRed @ Nov. 22 2002,15:43)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">My military background is not only classified, it's irrelevant to the topic. It only takes common sense to know that A) women are physically inferior to men, and B) Because of 'A', they are not the best choice for combat soldiers. Personally, I don't really care, because women are not allowed to serve in combat position in the U.S. Marines, THANK GOD, and since that's the most powerful army on the planet, that's really all you need to know.<span id='postcolor'> <span id='postcolor'> Heh, heh, that is actually funny! Thanks!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Balschoiw @ Nov. 22 2002,15:37)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Cry about it, argue about it, then deal with it. <span id='postcolor'> Better revert that for yourself Baron as your opinions and thoughts on that issue seem to be really nonsense.<span id='postcolor'> I'm sorry, what? I've been ignoring you through most of this as all you do point fingers and call names and make accusations, but actually contribute nothing of any value. Why do you have such a hard time with the fact that men and women are NOT created equal? Keep on whining......

We should obliterate Iraq and turn it into a U.S. vacation resort

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Nov. 22 2002,15:26)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (BaronVonRed @ Nov. 22 2002,14:52)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Real life isn't like QII/QIII or Unreal Tournament -in real life, women in combat are a liability.<span id='postcolor'> Run out of arguments, ey? If you havn't noticed the people here that are defending the womens rights to be in the military have a military background. Can you say the same?<span id='postcolor'> No, I haven't run out of arguments, in fact, I'm not evne arguing. I am just presenting the facts: women, in general, do not measure up in combat to men, in general. The people that think otherwise have played too many games that depict women as equivalent on the battlefield. Just because you can't see that logic doesn't mean it's not a valid argument. My military background is not only classified, it's irrelevant to the topic. It only takes common sense to know that A) women are physically inferior to men, and B) Because of 'A', they are not the best choice for combat soldiers. Personally, I don't really care, because women are not allowed to serve in combat position in the U.S. Marines, THANK GOD, and since that's the most powerful army on the planet, that's really all you need to know.

Yeah, our world's a mess. Somebody needs to hit the "clear" button and start over.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Bart.Jan @ Nov. 22 2002,13:32)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (BaronVonRed @ Nov. 22 2002,12:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Women are women, and men are men. They are NOT equal in physical or mental abilities, they are DIFFERENT. They both have their strengths and weaknesses as humans. No man can do EVERYTHING better than a woman can do, and no woman can do EVERYTHING better than a man can do. That's the way it is throughout nature, and that's the way it was intended. Cry about it, argue about it, then deal with it.<span id='postcolor'> No man/woman can do EVERYTHING better then another man/woman can do - generally. But it's all about individual persons, not about men and women generally. You can not deny something for someone only because he/she is part of group that has some generally unacceptable attributes. (racism, nazism, sexism) Woman are generally physically weaker that men are, but you think it shoud be reason to do not let that woman (from picture above) to be machinegunner ? (if she mets other needed criteria)<span id='postcolor'> Real life isn't like QII/QIII or Unreal Tournament -in real life, women in combat are a liability.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"> 1.87 - Fixed: Too many dead bodies were kept on server in 1.85. <span id='postcolor'> WHOHOOOOOOO! Are these guys awesome OR WHAT!!!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Suma @ Nov. 21 2002,15:17)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">All of them work during the game as well, but the syntax is different. While in description.ext you should use showMap = true (you are setting a variable) in the game correct usage is showMap true (you are calling a function)<span id='postcolor'> Wow - I tested all this last night, including showgps, etc, and they all worked flawlessly! Heh, heh, the possibilities are endless: if(daylight or (player distance fire1 < 2)) then {showmap true} else {showmap false} Heh, heh, can't see the map at night unless you get up by the fire!

Women are women, and men are men. They are NOT equal in physical or mental abilities, they are DIFFERENT. They both have their strengths and weaknesses as humans. No man can do EVERYTHING better than a woman can do, and no woman can do EVERYTHING better than a man can do. That's the way it is throughout nature, and that's the way it was intended. Cry about it, argue about it, then deal with it.