acidcrash

yea i like that idea. It seems im the only one who ever guards the towns while everyone is off building tanks and helo's with me stuck still on infantry. does the amount of people in the town matter or do you need just the one for the extra cash? Us over at SWAF love it, been playing it constantly (several hour game in some cases ) however we've not detirmined what it is yet, but twice atleast while playing we have had nearly everyone (usually just one person and the admin survive) crash to desktop other than that, great! think we'll be keeping that map upto date on server

hmm, gotta be metal (heavy, black, death, doom not nu), some rock and inustrial. some examples would be classics like Metallica and slayer to bands like Morbid angel Cradle of filth, ministry and ramstein. i myself cant stand rap etc, it makes me wanna kill myself its really not my cup of tea (i reckon a mods gonna close this pretty soon)

well for a start there is also deffinatly a M2 bradly version (or whatever its designation is with the ADATS system), and besides, it wouldnt be a matter of "placing a new chasis under the turret" it would require them to remake it from scratch, i know im more than happy with the adats as it is

that kinda looks like a cross between a Blackhawk, Sprite and Dauphin...

i would hardly call gamesnet and quakenet small networks, gamesnet and quakenet are two of the larger networks, see for yourself: Quakenet Gamesnet

theres also #ofpec on quakenet thats the Operation Fashpoint Editing Center's IRC chan

i give this a life expectancy of about 5 minutes

theres several places for addons of one kind or another to go: weapons, units, islands etc go in the addons directory singe player missions go in the missions directory and, multiplayer missions go in the mpmissions directory. i hope this answers your question

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Ex-RoNiN @ Oct. 11 2002,11:09)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">1--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Uziyahu @ Oct. 11 2002,031)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Who is the chick in your signature graphic, Placebo?<span id='postcolor'> You are seeing ghosts mate, Placebo hasn't posted in this thread <span id='postcolor'> lol i think he means you

that looks very similar to the one i use, blends in pretty well with the OFP bushes. You can find quite a few here

yeh, it would ruin it to have the moped sounds, but i think we can all sit back and relax, Selectthis has made quite alot of good quality addons (take the Vietnam addons for example, all class addons) besides, if hes taken as long on sounds as it looks like he has on the model, then id say it has good job!

lmao, then he goes and arrests you for "badgering a cop" or somthing daft like that

rofl! i can see theres gonna be alot of them hanging around sandwhich shops now!

When you say delta force, i presume its Delta force 3?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (RaptorAce @ Oct. 07 2002,22:11)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAH.... Anyways, back to the aircraft... the EFT is a multirole aircraft, whereas the F-22 is made solely for dogfighting (even though it has the ability to carry bombs, as that position will probably be filled by the JSF) My thinking is... that the F-22 is stronger, and possibly the strongest air superiority fighter to date, I believe that because it was designed with manueverability in mind, unlike the EFT which is made to be a Jack-of-all-Trades aircraft and I think this gives the F-22 an automatic air to air advantage in it's original design. Â Then again, I could be wrong since there's very little information about this aircraft.<span id='postcolor'> you obviously didnt read the announcement i posted, its been redesignated F/A-22 meaning its equal at attack not just figher

i think he said it was down to it using the BIS config.cpp or somthing, and that he would have to write his own dont quote me on that though, im not entirely sure

that looks closer to german than american

that looks closer to german than american

I think Falcon 4.0 can appear complicated: all those switches and buttons, especially in SuperPak3. but it just takes time to get used it and it becomes second nature almost. Â i have no problem picking up flight sims though, but ive been playing them since the early days on amigas

i agree, Falcon 4 with SP3 is very good, its just a shame that it has bugs (and very annoying bugs) such as CTD every time you "crash" or get shot down, then theres the sound bug, the sound is all stuttery from inside the cockpit and the other aircraft having the flight profile of the F16 too...take a B52 for example, flying around pulling Split-S's just shouldnt be possible...ahh well. but besides little niggly things like that its a vast improvement

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Acidcrash @ Oct. 03 2002,16:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">for the record, the F22 has been redesignated F/A-22 since it has A-G capabilities, this from a congress announcement last week<span id='postcolor'> going back to what i said here, i dug out the announcement about the F22s redesignation: </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">> F-22 redesignation reflects combat role > > by Staff Sgt. A.J. Bosker > Air Force Print News > > WASHINGTON -- Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. John P. Jumper announced a > change in the designation of the F-22 Raptor at the 2002 Air Force > Association National Convention here Sept. 17. The change is meant to more > accurately reflect the aircraft's multimission roles and capabilities in > contemporary strategic environments. > > "Secretary (of the Air Force Dr. James G.) Roche and I have decided to adopt > the name F/A-22, using the A (or attack) prefix to emphasize the multiple > roles and many dimensions of the Raptor," Jumper explained. "The Raptor > will feed on prey both from the sky and from the (ground)." > > Advances in technology and emerging Air Force doctrine make today's Raptor > very different from the fighter envisioned when the program was first > planned. Technological advancements in the fire control radar and > integrated avionics, combined with the advent of smaller, very precise > munitions, create a far more powerful air-to-ground strike system, Jumper > said in a written statement. > > "Indeed, the Raptor's most significant contributions over the next 30 years > will be (in) its attack role, particularly against the most lethal next two > generations of (enemy) surface-to-air missiles," Jumper said. > > The F/A-22 will enable the Air Force's other stealth assets to operate 24 > hours a day and will "sanitize the fly corridors" for airlift aircraft to > resupply ground forces deployed in enemy territory, the general said. > > Roche said in a written statement that the Raptor has been transformed, in > line with Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld's priorities, to a > multimission, joint system that will change the way the United States and > its allies conduct war. > > "Therefore, a redesignation will increase the focus on this transformation > and allow people to better grasp this overall evolution," Roche said. > > The F/A-22 has evolved into an air dominance aircraft capable of "kicking > down the door" in anti-access situations, and the redesignation simply > better reflects the inherent air-to-ground and air-to-air capabilities of > the Raptor, Roche said. > > "Transformation is changing our thinking, but not necessarily throwing > everything old away," Jumper said. "It's building on what we have but using > it in very new ways." > > The F/A-22 is a prime example of the Air Force's approach to transforming by > combining air dominance, precision attack, networked intelligence, > surveillance and reconnaissance, and joint close air support into an > unprecedented single platform, he said. > > "Its sensors will provide valuable information regarding precise target > location and characteristics into a common network for all to use -- both > air, land and sea," Jumper said. "In short, it will be its own > intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platform." > > The F/A-22 will be the only system able to reliably engage cruise missiles > and will be delivered to replace fighters that have been in active service > longer than any fighter the Air Force has ever had in its inventory, Jumper > said. He added that the F/A-22 will be able to deploy with a fraction of > the logistics footprint and manpower required to sustain the service's > current 25-year old platforms. > > "(Secretary Roche and I) believe that the combination of these capabilities > is transformational and that this transformational weapon should be called > the F/A-22," Jumper said. <span id='postcolor'> might be veerring a little off the topic, but its related

I know Walker, the person who made the wetsuit addon is updating it at the moment, or so he says here

try playing on a squad server, you usually get a good game on there, admitidly though, the ingame browser doesnt bring many resukts up psst...try 80.78.226.24:3200 SWAF European 2 Server

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Oct. 03 2002,17:12)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Bah, the EF is shite anyway. JAS 39 Gripen all the way <span id='postcolor'> pfft even the rafeale is better than the Gripen *waits for Ran to appear*

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Badgerboy @ Oct. 03 2002,01:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">1 on 1, with EQUALLY skilled pilots, a F22 would have no problem taking down a Typhoon BVR, or close up. Its sad to say, but it can outmaneouver a Typhoon from the data I've seen, and get into the furball with ease. However......! Thats what it is... a dedicated A-A aircraft. Oh ok, future models with be able to drop JDAMS, but thats a tacked on, half hearted capability. The Typhoon, can haul a massive amount of fire power to the target and nail it, and it that regard its more of a jack of all trades. Which makes sense when you realise how much the F-22 costs. The RAF couldn't possibly afford the F-22 (Although it was considered as a FOAS option), but we got a multirole A/C, unlike the F-22, which can do one role brilliantly, but is limited to that. 1 F-22 = 3 1/2 Typhoons. A-A, I would like a F-22 For multirole missions (Which the RAF specialises in), I would prefer a Typhoon.<span id='postcolor'> for the record, the F22 has been redesignated F/A-22 since it has A-G capabilities, this from a congress announcement last week and to end this, shall we just say each aircraft has its weakness's and strengths? Â