Aculaud

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Warin @ Sep. 11 2002,19:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">The Christian Science Monitor has an interesting article on defining terrorism. You can find it here. You're either with us or against us... The Bush Doctrine Oi.<span id='postcolor'> Yeah, i was watching praise the lord yesterday, and this guy was saying something like... "Its such a hard question. If there is an omnipotent god in heaven, why would he let such a tragedy take place. Well.......................It would take several sermons to cover that, but the fact is....there is a DEVIL loose in the world doing these things. Getting in God's way". Or something to that extent. Thats what i love about christianity. No proof. Just manmade excuses for gods apperant short comings.

I did just think of something though. This trigger activating method has never been a problem for me. So what is it thats going wrong? Are you getting an error message when the second one is supposed to activate, or does it simply not go at all?

Any word you want. Like, say you want the second trigger to end the mission. You'd make the second trigger an end trigger and put a word like "over" in its condition field. Then, in the first trigger, you'd put over = TRUE in the activation field. Hope this helps

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ Sep. 11 2002,21:25)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Except for maybe India- those guys play for keeps<span id='postcolor'> LOL, Tex !! Kinda bogus though. You want a larger piece, you accept any consequences forthcoming! Kinda inevitable though. Man is superficial, therefor, man modifies his vehicle to preform better. I wouldnt go through with it, even if i WAS in need. Every girl iv spoken with on the matter says its not the size, its how good you are with it.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ Sep. 11 2002,20:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I would reccomend you do at least something every day. Also, a high protein diet is conducive to building muscle (eat the meat goddam you  )<span id='postcolor'> Lol!  Well, iv been advised by professional trainers to put AT LEAST a day between each of your workouts. As for protien, lets see here....Tofu (tons of it!! ), broccoli, beans, brown rice, rice and beans together, peanuts, peanut butter, fortified soymilk, sprouted wheat bread, Gardenburgers (which have 15 grams per burger, and i eat about 3 at a time), other assorted nuts and seeds. Trust me man, iv got the protien

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (MDRZulu @ Sep. 11 2002,20:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">wow that nuke footage was pretty cool i need to find some more.<span id='postcolor'> Yeah, i heard about this video, Trinity and Beyond, thats supposed to have all the declassified nuke test footage from the first US bomb to about a few years ago. Havent found myself a copy yet

Today is indeed the day of propaganda

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Jester983 @ Sep. 11 2002,15:47)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I know this college student at my church whos real buff and I asked him how he got so buff and he says what you need to do is set up a schedule. Dont say like "oh well im not going to work out this week. Ill just double it next." He told me thats the wrong way to go. He says work out about 2-3 times a week or just pick something that works out with you and that you like.<span id='postcolor'> Yeah, i'm usually at it every other two days if not every other day. I'm getting there

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Mister Frag @ Sep. 11 2002,14:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Don't forget to enter the Strongest Man competition when you are done bulking up! Â <span id='postcolor'> Uhhhhhh, yeah, those guys could kick about 145 of my asses, no problem.

Iv been having pretty good success with 25 rep sets on 50 lbs. On a good day i can get out about 200 reps total. Thats not including the 80-120 reps chestfly i do before that. We've got a blowflex here, so thats been coming in pretty handy. I was just wondering what would help push muscle over more towards the center.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ Sep. 11 2002,13:24)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Bench press for bulking up, pushups for toning<span id='postcolor'> Much thank yous!!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Sep. 11 2002,13:20)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (zverushka @ Sep. 11 2002,22:18)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">ewwwww... intestinal parasite !!!  <span id='postcolor'> I second that   Tell us more  <span id='postcolor'> I got it from eating things like junk food and animal products!!!   C'mon, i'd like an answer please!

Found 'em. Thanks, mate. Do you know if there are any other new ones like that for any other commands?

Howcome? New command since resistance? Iv tried a few different syntaxes and nothing works.

Thanks, but found out why it wasnt working. I guess you cant put any switchmove syntax that starts with "FX" in a soldiers init field. It has to be done with a trigger or in a script. Thanks though.

9--></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Col. Kurtz @ Sep. 11 2002,009)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Tex [uSMC] @ Sep. 11 2002,16:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Remember, you are talking to a Texan- I just took your entire last post as a compliment.<span id='postcolor'> You took ALL of it as a complement? Even when I slagged off the OICW?<span id='postcolor'> Look at it this way. NONE of the equipment you listed has ever failed to get the job done. Except the last one cause its still being developed.

I personally think the AAI corp. model was more practical and compact looking. If it had gone through the amount of beta testing and revision that the current model had, they probably would have gotten something more maneuverable. This design is at least a little shorter:

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (denoir @ Sep. 10 2002,13:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">We have a new car for OFP! <span id='postcolor'> LMFAO!!!! That is classic! Where do i get this?

I wouldnt. The idea of it is super cool to write about and make computer games out of, but thats as far as i'd take it. I like the idea of being able to try again instead of only get one shot at the whole thing It'd be far too stressful in real life.

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Oligo @ Sep. 10 2002,02:13)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">For a nice demonstration of combat wounds, see movies like Blackhawk Down or (yuck) Saving Private Ryan. They should seriously overhaul the damage systems of first person shooters.<span id='postcolor'> Or "We Were Soldiers" with Mel Gibson. Christ, that was intense! And i agree. Even in Ghost Recon, you can peg someone in the upper body up to three times before they die with a 7.62mm round. Iv even nailed someone in the Head\Neck area with one and they didnt die.

Could a sniper in real life heal his/her own wounds, or at least field bandage them so they could still maintain a degree of functionality?

I just think things like its unmatched versitility in being able to re-create it however you want will keep it alive far longer than any other game. The only reason i'm not really into it right now is because my computer's in really sad shape and i'm getting a new one in not too long. When that happens, i'll be cranking out missions left and right!

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Demagor @ Sep. 10 2002,11:11)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">... this REALLY looks uncomfortable. Â Is anyone truly considering manufacturing this, and/or is any nation's army really THAT interested in permanently displacing their infantrymen's shoulders by forcing them to wedge this weapon (which is roughly the size of Bermuda) in a firing position?<span id='postcolor'> Well, if you think about it, no army in their right mind would field a weapon that would compromise the health of the soldier reducing his effectiveness. So i'm pretty sure it wouldnt be THAT tough to handle. I know Heckler and Koch and Alliant Techsystems have been working on this a lot, but last i heard it was definitely still in the development stages. Check it out in more depth at HK Pro. I think they're down right now, but keep that site in mind. Lots of good stuff.

Funny. I dont see bond losing any steam at all. I think the new ones add more life to the classic ones. I see them keeping the old style alive perfectly. Take the begining of The World Is Not Enough. Him in the bank getting frisked, and the manager on the other side of the desk turns slowly with a cigar in one hand and an evil, condescending look on his face ".....So good of you to come see me, Mr Bond..." And you are right, they're not making them how they used to. Goldeneye did a TON of new things, added a whole bunch of new elements, but it was still Bond in all his glory. They stick to a style for sure, but not a formula, which is good. Sticking to something specific just makes you predictible. You have to reinvent sometime. The only thing i dont like about the up and comers is the lack of Desmond Llewelyn, but that one was kind of out of our hands

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Jester983 @ Sep. 09 2002,1900)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">YES I KNOW! I ask for it last page too. Curse! I wish i had mod powers! Denoir/warin/SOMEONE plz close this thread!!!! THINK OF THE CHILDREN! Â <span id='postcolor'> </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Col. Kurtz @ Sep. 09 2002,18:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Yet another thread that has gone way off topic. Started on predetor, question was answered on page 2, talking about Aliens now. Denoir, I call you to do the mighty duty of closing this thread! <span id='postcolor'> Oh, pipe down! Aliens, predetor, its all the same thing