Jump to content

Aaron Kane

Member
  • Content Count

    680
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Medals

Everything posted by Aaron Kane

  1. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (AKM74 @ June 29 2002,05:35)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I think BIS find easy way to balance east and west. You see... 1930 TT pistol = modern west equipment. (They don't respect you guys) T80 (downgraded to T34) = modern Abrams KA50 (no weapons, downgraded to civilian chopper) = Apache Common BIS, west guys will not like you anymore, you not respect them. BTW Very good job on resistance add-on, graphics and all this extra very welcome. Good work. The situations with weapons balance remind me US road workers. (Guys from US will understand me) "If you have not enough cars to create traffic, you must close line or two"<span id='postcolor'> I dont mean to be rude, but could you please rephrase that?
  2. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ June 29 2002,02:27)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">They use the AT-6 in my version.<span id='postcolor'> Damn.... so is the V-80 just a more manuverable Hind pretty much?
  3. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ June 29 2002,02:27)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">They use the AT-6 in my version.<span id='postcolor'> Damn.... so is the V-80 just a more manuverable Hind pretty much?
  4. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Paratrooper @ June 29 2002,02:27)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">They use the AT-6 in my version.<span id='postcolor'> Damn.... so is the V-80 just a more manuverable Hind pretty much?
  5. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    Eek! God, I hope it doesnt have the same AT-6's, that'd pretty much ruin the chopper IMO! And according to FAS, the KA-50 doesnt even carry AT-6's... I just hope they do carry a better missle ingame
  6. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    Eek! God, I hope it doesnt have the same AT-6's, that'd pretty much ruin the chopper IMO! And according to FAS, the KA-50 doesnt even carry AT-6's... I just hope they do carry a better missle ingame
  7. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    Eek! God, I hope it doesnt have the same AT-6's, that'd pretty much ruin the chopper IMO! And according to FAS, the KA-50 doesnt even carry AT-6's... I just hope they do carry a better missle ingame
  8. Aaron Kane

    Chinese and us planes again playing games

    Well I dont think any U.S. planes are flying directly over mainland China, but I might be wrong. I dont think we're on "Red Alert" or whatever, the press was just mentioning that Chinese pilots are still flying very close to American planes, though the Chinese are apparently being much more professional and careful this time. I dont know if its necessarily true to say that China is a growing threat to the world, it really depends on your perspective. I mean, just from looking on the forums, its obvious that alot of people see the U.S.A. as the biggest threat to the world.
  9. Aaron Kane

    The undecided air-superiority debate

    Damn, that Harrier one is nice!
  10. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    So... how about that V-80? I dont have Resistance yet, but I was wondering what kind of weapons does it have? I hope it doesnt share those crappy missiles the Hind uses
  11. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    So... how about that V-80? I dont have Resistance yet, but I was wondering what kind of weapons does it have? I hope it doesnt share those crappy missiles the Hind uses
  12. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    So... how about that V-80? I dont have Resistance yet, but I was wondering what kind of weapons does it have? I hope it doesnt share those crappy missiles the Hind uses
  13. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    Yes, but many modern Western tanks, such as the M1A1, have stabilized guns which increase accuracy greatly while moving. It doesnt matter how fast you're firing when the enemy can hit you with fewer, more accurate shots.
  14. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    Yes, but many modern Western tanks, such as the M1A1, have stabilized guns which increase accuracy greatly while moving. It doesnt matter how fast you're firing when the enemy can hit you with fewer, more accurate shots.
  15. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    Yes, but many modern Western tanks, such as the M1A1, have stabilized guns which increase accuracy greatly while moving. It doesnt matter how fast you're firing when the enemy can hit you with fewer, more accurate shots.
  16. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Cyanide @ June 28 2002,05:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Aaron Kane @ June 27 2002,23:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Ummm... I'm not talking about ingame Cyanide. Â S.F.F.R. and I were talking about real-life loading speeds. Â <span id='postcolor'> OK, even if so: a human reloader would only be able to keep a high reloading rate for a couple of gunshots. If you've ever seen how big and heavy a modern tank's shell is you would understand this. No matter how strong a person is, a reloading mechanism is better in combat.<span id='postcolor'> But arent most of the current generation of auto-loaders still vulnerable and to an extent unreliable in combat conditions? I'm not saying that a loader isnt vulnerable, since he is another crew man that can be injured in combat, but still... I realize that the rounds are heavy. If I remember correctly, they are like 60 pounds (I am like 90% sure that number is wrong, but I'm 10% sure its right ) But a single round is all it will take to disable or in some cases destroy an enemy tank. The gunner wouldnt have to keep shoving rounds into the cannon because of this. And with the accuracy of modern tanks, both Eastern and Western, neither an autoloader or a manual loader would be under enormous stress, other than combat stress and fatigue of course
  17. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Cyanide @ June 28 2002,05:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Aaron Kane @ June 27 2002,23:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Ummm... I'm not talking about ingame Cyanide. Â S.F.F.R. and I were talking about real-life loading speeds. Â <span id='postcolor'> OK, even if so: a human reloader would only be able to keep a high reloading rate for a couple of gunshots. If you've ever seen how big and heavy a modern tank's shell is you would understand this. No matter how strong a person is, a reloading mechanism is better in combat.<span id='postcolor'> But arent most of the current generation of auto-loaders still vulnerable and to an extent unreliable in combat conditions? I'm not saying that a loader isnt vulnerable, since he is another crew man that can be injured in combat, but still... I realize that the rounds are heavy. If I remember correctly, they are like 60 pounds (I am like 90% sure that number is wrong, but I'm 10% sure its right ) But a single round is all it will take to disable or in some cases destroy an enemy tank. The gunner wouldnt have to keep shoving rounds into the cannon because of this. And with the accuracy of modern tanks, both Eastern and Western, neither an autoloader or a manual loader would be under enormous stress, other than combat stress and fatigue of course
  18. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Cyanide @ June 28 2002,05:56)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Aaron Kane @ June 27 2002,23:53)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Ummm... I'm not talking about ingame Cyanide. Â S.F.F.R. and I were talking about real-life loading speeds. Â <span id='postcolor'> OK, even if so: a human reloader would only be able to keep a high reloading rate for a couple of gunshots. If you've ever seen how big and heavy a modern tank's shell is you would understand this. No matter how strong a person is, a reloading mechanism is better in combat.<span id='postcolor'> But arent most of the current generation of auto-loaders still vulnerable and to an extent unreliable in combat conditions? I'm not saying that a loader isnt vulnerable, since he is another crew man that can be injured in combat, but still... I realize that the rounds are heavy. If I remember correctly, they are like 60 pounds (I am like 90% sure that number is wrong, but I'm 10% sure its right ) But a single round is all it will take to disable or in some cases destroy an enemy tank. The gunner wouldnt have to keep shoving rounds into the cannon because of this. And with the accuracy of modern tanks, both Eastern and Western, neither an autoloader or a manual loader would be under enormous stress, other than combat stress and fatigue of course
  19. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Cyanide @ June 28 2002,05:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Aaron Kane @ June 27 2002,22:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I'm not talking about when the tank is rolling along, firing at targets. Â I'm talking about when its sitting perfectly still, without a care in the world, and the loader has to load the cannon as fast as possible. Â Are you saying its impossible for him to do it in approximatley 3 seconds? Â If so, maybe 4? Â I'm sure they can load in 5 seconds.<span id='postcolor'> Rubbish. Utter rubbish. Try it yourself - put 2 tank crews @ Intro island and you'll see that the T80 would always get destroyed first, soth crews having the same level of skill of course, simply because the M1A1 would fire more shells. As simple as that. 2 Space Alex And you definitely were not thinking when saying that </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Humans are faster than machines. <span id='postcolor'> It would've been funny if it weren't SO ridiculous. My first thought was to try imagine a soldier with a WW1 rifle firing with a better rate than his mate with a morern assault rifle. It's absolutely the same in case of MBTs.<span id='postcolor'> Ummm... I'm not talking about ingame Cyanide. S.F.F.R. and I were talking about real-life loading speeds.
  20. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Cyanide @ June 28 2002,05:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Aaron Kane @ June 27 2002,22:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I'm not talking about when the tank is rolling along, firing at targets. Â I'm talking about when its sitting perfectly still, without a care in the world, and the loader has to load the cannon as fast as possible. Â Are you saying its impossible for him to do it in approximatley 3 seconds? Â If so, maybe 4? Â I'm sure they can load in 5 seconds.<span id='postcolor'> Rubbish. Utter rubbish. Try it yourself - put 2 tank crews @ Intro island and you'll see that the T80 would always get destroyed first, soth crews having the same level of skill of course, simply because the M1A1 would fire more shells. As simple as that. 2 Space Alex And you definitely were not thinking when saying that </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Humans are faster than machines. <span id='postcolor'> It would've been funny if it weren't SO ridiculous. My first thought was to try imagine a soldier with a WW1 rifle firing with a better rate than his mate with a morern assault rifle. It's absolutely the same in case of MBTs.<span id='postcolor'> Ummm... I'm not talking about ingame Cyanide. S.F.F.R. and I were talking about real-life loading speeds.
  21. Aaron Kane

    Ka-50 hokum history..

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Cyanide @ June 28 2002,05:51)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Aaron Kane @ June 27 2002,22:15)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I'm not talking about when the tank is rolling along, firing at targets. Â I'm talking about when its sitting perfectly still, without a care in the world, and the loader has to load the cannon as fast as possible. Â Are you saying its impossible for him to do it in approximatley 3 seconds? Â If so, maybe 4? Â I'm sure they can load in 5 seconds.<span id='postcolor'> Rubbish. Utter rubbish. Try it yourself - put 2 tank crews @ Intro island and you'll see that the T80 would always get destroyed first, soth crews having the same level of skill of course, simply because the M1A1 would fire more shells. As simple as that. 2 Space Alex And you definitely were not thinking when saying that </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Humans are faster than machines. <span id='postcolor'> It would've been funny if it weren't SO ridiculous. My first thought was to try imagine a soldier with a WW1 rifle firing with a better rate than his mate with a morern assault rifle. It's absolutely the same in case of MBTs.<span id='postcolor'> Ummm... I'm not talking about ingame Cyanide. S.F.F.R. and I were talking about real-life loading speeds.
  22. Aaron Kane

    The undecided air-superiority debate

    Yeah, the Tornado can. But SO CAN I!!!!
  23. Aaron Kane

    Next next next generation battle@@

    Everyone always ignores those cool little soldiers in Japanese Anime cartoons. I mean look at those guys! You cant see their face, their assault rifles look cool as Hell, and they have walkie talkies! WALKIE TALKIES!!! Now hide and go seek will be more fun than ever!
  24. Aaron Kane

    New pics! screen shots of the bike in action!

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Harnu @ June 28 2002,04:14)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote (placebo @ June 28 2002,01:20) Warcraft 3 is crap too  So inanely generic, but hey if that's what makes ya moist more power to ya, but really you should buy Opf:R first  THATS IT!!! What the Hell does "More power to ya?" mean!?!? I have a hunch its along the lines of "whatever floats your boat", and if so, I'm gonna go beat the *poo* out of a lot of people.      <span id='postcolor'> If that's how you feel, more power to ya.  I may not agree with you when you say ur gonna beat the *poo* outa of a lot of people, but hey, whatever floats your boat man. <span id='postcolor'> Oh your lucky you arent in my time zone, or else it'd be CLOBBERIN TIME! ... give or take a few minutes
  25. Aaron Kane

    New pics! screen shots of the bike in action!

    </span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Harnu @ June 28 2002,04:14)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote (placebo @ June 28 2002,01:20) Warcraft 3 is crap too  So inanely generic, but hey if that's what makes ya moist more power to ya, but really you should buy Opf:R first  THATS IT!!! What the Hell does "More power to ya?" mean!?!? I have a hunch its along the lines of "whatever floats your boat", and if so, I'm gonna go beat the *poo* out of a lot of people.      <span id='postcolor'> If that's how you feel, more power to ya.  I may not agree with you when you say ur gonna beat the *poo* outa of a lot of people, but hey, whatever floats your boat man. <span id='postcolor'> Oh your lucky you arent in my time zone, or else it'd be CLOBBERIN TIME! ... give or take a few minutes
×